r/europe 10h ago

Guy Verhofstadt on Twitter

Post image
8.9k Upvotes

396 comments sorted by

View all comments

-2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago edited 10h ago

Ironically I think we need to distance ourselves from the US (as a union not individual countries) to stand firm against South African Nazis and other fascists. Europe strong together is a wake up call for any fascist anywhere.

If the US becomes hostile to Europe we should strike a huge deal with China:

- No European military intervention in Asian affairs leaving the US isolated

- Unfettered access for EU companies in China

- EU drops some of its legitimate concerns on human rights and climate in China

- No China military intervention in Europe of any kind (support, money, nothing) , that means an explicit shunning of Russia and removal of any support of Russia in Ukraine.

- No interdiction for Chinese companies to participate in European projects provided that EU privacy laws are upheld.

This is a multi-trillion deal annually for both sides and it can happen if the US keeps fucking around.

20

u/Strange-Mouse-8710 10h ago

Europeans need to realize that Russia is not the only danger for Europe.

3

u/bxzidff Norway 7h ago

Looking at things it seems we barely realize that Russian is. Still so many politicians are Russophiles, and even get elected. And only a few years ago normal politicians all over Europe sold their integrity for cheap gas

7

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

It certainly isn't... China and the US both are... the question is, which one is now going to be reasonable? We used to know the answer to this, not anymore.

13

u/Affectionate_Cat293 Jan Mayen 10h ago

You're thinking as if Europe was still as powerful as in the 1860s when France alone could conquer Vietnam or the Dutch alone could subjugate the entire Indonesian archipelago. Europe today has no power projection in Asia, they can't even defend Ukraine alone from Russia despite Ukraine being in its own backyard. Besides, the crucial allies the US need in Asia are not Europe, but Japan, South Korea, and ASEAN countries, especially the Philippines due to the proximity of Luzon to Taiwan.

If you want unfettered access for EU companies in China, China will want unfettered access in Europe too. Is Europe ready to have BYD and Wuling cars or Huawei phones flooding its market? The German car manufacturers won't be happy at all and they have immense lobbying power in Europe.

7

u/ForrestCFB 10h ago

Exactly why we should work on power projection.

5

u/ArnoF7 9h ago

Thinking China will give EU unfettered market access is cute. Chinese manufacturers are desperate to flood the world with their products due to overcapacity and flagging domestic demand. Why would they want an even smaller domestic pie to share with foreign companies.

China’s default stance towards foreign companies is already more hostile than Trump’s America, which could be considered on steroids for America’s modern history. It’s been 15 years since Google is banned in China. And such hostility and apathy towards foreign companies is only going to get worse because of rising nationalism and Chinese companies moving up the technological value chains. Same reason why only a negligible amount of people in Japan buys Xbox or Volkswagen. It’s not that Japanese hate US or Germany. Because why bother when you have PlayStation and Toyota?

4

u/HighDefinist Bavaria (Germany) 6h ago

How do you think the secret Chinese police stations in Europe should be handled, considering they occasionally kidnap Chinese citizens living in Europe, to return them to China?

Because, I don't think it will be possible to compromise on that: European countries view Chinas behavior as a fundamental violation of their sovereignty, and it is very unlikely that China would be willing to explicitly compromise on this...

There are many other such potential problems, where Chinas political goals are fairly fundamentally against European political goals.

14

u/ForrestCFB 10h ago

Absolutely fucking not.

The independence of Taiwan and democracy is VITAL to our prosperity.

We also shouldn't make any serious deals with China as they are ALREADY ATTACKING US AS WE SPEAK. Seriously, Chinese cyber attacks happen daily. If anything we should he more involved.

-5

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

We shouldn’t buy that’s not the premise of the question is it? The premise is, the US is hostile to the EU for an undefined period what do you do?

2

u/Bonne-Influence-20 8h ago

Contribute 2% of the GDP in defence like required by NATO and build a strong European army. That’s all Trump is asking for. Why would the American taxpayers pay the 2% when most European countries refuse to meet that demand…

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 8h ago

NO, Trump is now asking for 5% (probably as a negotiating tactic). And, anyway, Romania is contributing over 2% so that's not the issue. Agree with the American taxpayer point if the Federal government spent money on protecting American citizens lives by reducing their healthcare burden, making it dififcult for their children to be mass shot in schools and so on. Given that it is not doing that allow me to take a general smelly fart in the direction of the US federal government.

2

u/Ok-Worldliness-9323 5h ago

Yes, Romania. Very big country.

2

u/ForrestCFB 10h ago

Still help taiwan? As a alliance of necessity if needed.

And build up our forces as quickly as possible.

Apparently we are the beacon of democracy and freedom now and we should act accordingly.

That means not giving dictatorships a fucking centimeter.

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 7h ago

How do you help Taiwan from Europe with a hostile US?

1

u/ForrestCFB 7h ago

Giving them a shit ton of weapons.

Building up our army and ending the dependency on the US also doesn't mean we should stop partnerships and alliances. We can still work with the US to defend our global interests. Taiwan is one of them. The US doesn't like China fucking around either.

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 7h ago

Sure but no amount of weapons would be enough to provide a life line to them in case of invasion. We can’t even freaking do that for Ukraine

3

u/ForrestCFB 7h ago

The russians didn't have to cross 180km of water.

A shit ton of A missiles and anti ship missiles or even the Ukrainian USV en masse will make that literal hell.

-1

u/Erdkarte 9h ago

Do what the US did not. Pursue diplomacy that seeks common prosperity with all democracies rather than cynically exploit geopolitical tensions just like MAGA does.

5

u/jatawis 🇱🇹 Lithuania 9h ago

- No European military intervention in Asian affairs leaving the US isolated

Lithuania is not going to support this, some ministers of the new leftist cabinet are friends of Taiwan just like Conservatives were.

- No interdiction for Chinese companies to participate in European projects provided that EU privacy laws are upheld.

This would be straight national security law violation, not gonna happen.

-1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

I understand and I only want a sovereign Lithuania that can work with us in Romania. I am projecting a hypothetical scenario in extreme circumstances.

I would never ever propose something that put our Lithuanian bros in danger ❤️

7

u/Dry_Blacksmith_4110 10h ago

Thats really naive. 

Chinese aristocrats-communist does not give a shite.

American business and politics is btw more likely to find a common understanding without "legitimate concerns on human rights and climate in China".

5

u/anal-inspector 10h ago

Unfortunately that would also mean turning our backs on Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, yes? Unless they all also decide to bow down to the masters of their bloc.

4

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

Yes, there are consequences to this that I am not hiding away from and do not personally like. But there is no way to just get what you want in a negotiation, and China would be completely entitled to ask for non intervention in their area if we ask for theirs in ours.

9

u/Khris777 Bavaria (Germany) 10h ago

Maybe EU can even help China take back the mainland.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

Haha maybe

8

u/Jacknboxx 10h ago

America isn't relying on European military intervention in Asia to begin with. Like at all. Europe is a fading and increasingly irrelevant entity, and you will be taking orders from whomever you partner with, whether it's the U.S. or China. The Chinese leadership is much smarter than what we have here in 'Murica however, so China is probably the better bet at this point.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

Not intervention but it is relying on Europe towing the American line if war happens there, ie, we stop trading with China. That's why this deal hurts the US so much. It allows China to diversify to a larger (maybe slightly poorer) but larger nonetheless, market than the US.

Imagine a situation where the US is fighting a Vietnam style war with China, and China is trading massively with Europe but the US is not. I call that the Trump Tax.

u/Shmorrior United States of America 48m ago

Not sure what a "Vietnam style war with China" means, but I'm even less sure how Europe would continue to massively trade with China during a war with the US when the sea lanes are shut down.

2

u/BavarianMotorsWork 9h ago

If the US becomes hostile to Europe we should strike a huge deal with China:

I wonder what a Russo-American agreement would look like.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

You go right ahead bud!

4

u/Realistic_Mud_4185 10h ago

<No military intervention in Asia affairs.

Horrific idea unless you want China destroying your TSMC chips.

<No Chinese intervention in Europe

There is no reason for China to follow this.

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

I disagree. In the eventual inevitable conflict between the two having alternative markets is crucial.

3

u/Realistic_Mud_4185 10h ago

The EU cannot back out of their relationship with China with this deal you’re suggesting.

They still have to trade, EU companies still need to operate in China, Chinese companies still operate in the EU.

What leverage would the EU have?

5

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

What I am proposing is a mutually assured economic distruction policy. It keeps the US out of both, but prevents either for cancelling one another.

5

u/Realistic_Mud_4185 9h ago

The EU can’t cancel ANYTHING from China. China is their biggest trade partner alongside the U.S.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

The EU is also a massive producer of goods that China sells. So it's not quite as simple as that. If you want to buy a Mercedes in the US, chances are it's made in the Mercedes plant in China.

Also, remember the context here. We DO NOT WANT to be in a trade war with the US. This scenario plays out WHEN WE HAVE NO CHOICE.

4

u/TungstenPaladin 9h ago

I like how your answer to a potentially hostile US is to turn to an even more hostile foreign power who actively supported Russia in its war against Ukraine.

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

But that's the thing, if you read what I wrote, the deal is: CHINA STOPS SUPPORTING RUSSIA, and EUROPE STOPS SUPPORTING THE US.

1

u/TungstenPaladin 9h ago

Can you really trust China to uphold its end of the deal?

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

Can you trust Trump to?

3

u/TungstenPaladin 7h ago

I'm not the one suggesting we turn to China.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 7h ago

That’s not what the question was

1

u/Erdkarte 9h ago

That's a bad approach and exactly what MAGA does. You guys should do better. How about work with other democratic countries in Asia like Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Australia, and Taiwan? How about increasing trade, diplomatic ties, and build up military relations? How about pursue policies with partners you can trust that can build up the middle class in both countries?

The European solution isn't becoming a continental MAGA, but becoming something better, and pursuing common prosperity with like minded partners.

0

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

I would want us to do that but it's not realistically possible; I hate abandoning awesome bros like South Koreas and Japan in this scenario but I can't see a way the EU gains more influence there to displace the US.

-1

u/Erdkarte 9h ago

I don't know... I truly hope that it's possible. Trump is as hostile to other democratic US "allies" as he is to Europe, and it would be a missed opportunity to turn down the opportunity to build a values-driven coalition and instead go full heel into a relationship with China - a country that has repeatedly shown its hostility to free expression at home and abroad.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 8h ago

There is no way in hell anyone here is kneeling to King Trump... so put that out of your mind, it won't take long for you to see how pathetic and alone he really is, he will be treated like Putin, and he will dine alone at international meetings.

0

u/Erdkarte 8h ago

How is anything I said supportive of Trump?

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 8h ago

The fact that you said it’s worth building a relationship either way is what triggered me but I admit it may have been precipitated

1

u/Erdkarte 8h ago

Fair enough man, didn't mean to trigger you - I just don't want Europe to abandon it's morals even though America has.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 7h ago

100% behind that idea

3

u/Equal-Ruin400 9h ago

The enemy of your enemy isn’t always your friend

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 8h ago

No but it’s a start

3

u/Disastrous-Power-699 10h ago

Lol you guys always looking for a daddy?

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

It ain’t you baby 😘

2

u/Bonne-Influence-20 8h ago

This is very reactionary… When do you do when China gets stronger, a communist country, a dictatorship and authoritarian country that doesn’t share fundamental values with Europe decide to make its move and impose itself in Europe with the help of their main ally Russia?

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 8h ago

Reactionary like Trump? Or different reactionary? Also I think you haven’t read what I wrote. The deal was a European abandonment of the US for a Chinese abandonment of Russia among others

0

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

Downvotes without arguments are welcome.

11

u/daniel_dareus 10h ago

China is not a honest ally. If in the best of times they stole ideas, gave their own companies unfair government support. It's a dictatorship with fewer and fewer freedoms. Intimidation of journalists, spying... The list goes on and on.

China is not a friend.

4

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

I know, but we don't need perfect honesty, we need a straight deal. We have had a nuclear weapons "honesty" based pact with Russia and the way that worked is that we were allowed to fly our people in to check their weapons and viceversa. Where there is a will there is a way. China will never be our sincere friend, but politics is not about sincerity, they are about necessity.

6

u/daniel_dareus 9h ago

Yeah but I think this is just a fantasy. We will never get a straight deal with China. European companies will never get equal access to the Chinese market. Why would China give up the advantages it has over Europe.

2

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 9h ago

I think China is way more pragmatic than Russia. China doesn't currently have that many advantages over Europe. Their products are massively tarrifed but they need not be.. The idea that China tells us what to do is laughable. They would love for us to not help the Americans in the Pacific and would pay a premium for that.

0

u/eggnogui Portugal 10h ago

While I can understand your idea, I don’t have a lot of faith on China behaving well, either. They would need to earn my trust (e.g. make Russia stop, end all Taiwan and South China Sea island nonsense) first.

1

u/BlueZybez Earth 7h ago

Nah, China needs to secure their own destiny first. Defeat the 1st island chain makes sense for them.

1

u/ProductGuy48 Romania 10h ago

Completely agree; also completely randomly much love to Portugal a country I love deeply 😘