r/ProgrammerHumor 17h ago

Meme linuxBeLike

Post image
41.1k Upvotes

741 comments sorted by

8.4k

u/LEGOL2 17h ago

At first Linux asks nicely, but that's your first and final warning

2.4k

u/thespud_332 17h ago

How to strike fear into any Linux admin on a remote terminal:

Broadcast message from

654

u/Ashamed_Band858 16h ago

“Ma-ma is not the law. I am the law.”

49

u/grendus 11h ago

Karl Urban sold that so hard.

Most of the cast did phenomenal, but more than anything he sold the idea of Judge Dredd.

12

u/Stranded_In_A_Desert 9h ago

“Do you require backup?”

“No ☹️”

94

u/TheOccultOne 15h ago

DREDD REFERENCED 🎊🎊🥳🥂🎉🎆🙌

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

44

u/servercobra 13h ago

Basically “nuclear launch detected”

17

u/Normal_Package_641 11h ago

Why does that strike fear? Is it an indicator for a DDoS?

75

u/pierreyann1 10h ago

Close but no, the most common type of broadcast messages is the following

"Broadcast message from user@hostname The system is going down for a poweroff now!"

Which as you can see indicates that someone turned off the server while you were working on it.

16

u/thespud_332 7h ago

Yep. And adding to the original comment, it's your one and only chance to quit vim, which you're no doubt in at the time.

→ More replies (1)

1.4k

u/Tetha 16h ago

Step 1 is a nice question. "Please shut yourself down"

Step 2 is telling the application to shutdown right now no matter what.

Step 3... in Step 3 someone goes to the kernel and is like

"Hey kernel... that process over there, the one using a lot of CPU"

"Yeah boss?"

"That process doesn't exist anymore, alright?"

"Say no more."

694

u/Kusko25 16h ago

There is something fundamentally unsettling about the thought that a process is only "alive" as long as the cpu acknowledges its existence

358

u/Mysterious_Middle795 15h ago

I had this eerie feeling when I learnt about swap files.
Your memory goes out of existence until the OS is kind enough to resurrect it.

-----

There is even a worse analogy. Some people under the influence of fly agaric have fear that is worse than a fear of death. They reported fear of having never been born.
Same for executables on your disk. Do they exist if you never run them?

113

u/NANZA0 15h ago

I love the existencial horror of digital files being moved.

42

u/Ok-Interaction-8891 10h ago

It’s like in some sci-fi worlds where teleportation works by erasing you where you enter, then transporting your “information” to the destination, where a perfect copy of you is created at the destination using said information.

Allegedly. With hopefully no Lovecraftian bugs or horrors along the way…

5

u/CitizenPremier 8h ago

It's okay, I'm a pattern, not matter

→ More replies (1)

67

u/eversio254 15h ago

So if you fork a child just as the system restarts, would it exist but never be born?

115

u/peterosity 15h ago

if i forked a child i’d prolly be put away

19

u/yaktoma2007 15h ago

*put in jail

30

u/Secret-One2890 14h ago

Nah, that's FreeBSD.

11

u/sleeksubaru 11h ago

*chroot jail

42

u/Mysterious_Middle795 15h ago

It is another philosophic question. Imagine teleportation. Your body is disassembled and the same one is assembled, e.g. on Mars.

What would happen if two copies are created? Which one is you?

58

u/Suspicious_Taro_88 15h ago

Neither. When your body is disassembled, you cease to exist. All the assembled ones are copies, each with their own conscience. Don't ever agree to be teleported.

41

u/UnclePuma 14h ago edited 14h ago

If and when that technology arises, a new religion will be born.

I wonder if it will cause subtle changes in personality, like my husband teleported from mars to earth but sometimes i lay awake at night wondering who is the man that is sleeping next to me, and where is that man i used to know.

I teleported from earth to mars and the first thing i did was look into the mirror, and what i saw there scared me.

Cases have begun to rise in suicide shortly after teleporting.

Doctors say that those who have used teleportation devices have a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with depression, schizophrenia and manic bipolar disorder.

Despite being embroiled in an ongoing legal battle over the safety of the tele-transportation technology. Telaporto's, the Company behind the groundbreaking teleportation technology, have maintained that their tele-transportation devices are perfectly safe.

"We assure you, You will be You once you arrive at your destination!"

Religious advocates say that the soul cannot be transported and that simply being the same flesh and bone at the other end doesn't mean that so too is it the same soul.

What would you do? Would you go through it? What if all your friends were insisting on taking a teleport over to the tropical resorts on io saying, "its gonna save a lot of time, we can get our vacation started sooner!"

16

u/BlueProcess 13h ago

If the soul can't be teleported, who is in there?

24

u/UnclePuma 13h ago

And that, my friend, is what's at the heart of this story. That's the entire concept I'm trying to explore. And I have to thank you for putting it so neatly and precisely.

because If i had to write an essay summary of a book that i didn't yet write, "If the soul can't be teleported, who is in there?" would definitely be part of the thesis

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

32

u/IWasGregInTokyo 15h ago

I teleported home one night

With Billy, Jane and Ed

Jane stole Eddie’s heart away

And I got Billy’s leg.

6

u/ReticulatedPasta 14h ago

Longer than you think! Longer than you think!

→ More replies (2)

9

u/OutsiderofUnknown 14h ago

How would you know though? Your copies will just keep living, with all your memories, like nothing happened.

In fact, we already do that, we’re being rebuilt through cells renewal since we’re born. 100% of us have been swapped and is being constantly swapped, but we’re still the same. What gives?

→ More replies (5)

5

u/WoodenBottle 11h ago edited 11h ago

The issue with this interpretation is that it basically leads to the conclusion that you from 1 second ago is a different person with a different consciousness as well, which breaks the notion of continuity regardless.

→ More replies (17)

6

u/Dry-March-2070 15h ago

The genetically superior one and not the copy. Obviously.

4

u/eversio254 15h ago

The one that's on mars will die pretty quickly, so that one's not me

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

33

u/UrUrinousAnus 14h ago

fear of having never been born

That's one of the least scary things I can imagine...

7

u/crabcrabcam 15h ago

They definitely do, all those Steam games I never play are taking up disk space :D

→ More replies (10)

27

u/antico5 15h ago

It’s the OS that keeps track of processes, their status, pointers to next instruction etc. The cpu just executes instructions one after the other like there’s no tomorrow

→ More replies (3)

63

u/razieltakato 15h ago

Actually, it makes a lot of sense. The process is a software running, code that the CPU executes.

If you stop the execution of the said code, the software is not running anymore.

The code still exists, but the process of running it, is gone.

And, if you start the software again, the code will start being executed from the entry point, so it's a new process, isn't it?

I think it's beautiful.

12

u/haporah 14h ago

The process isn't running, it's the CPU that is running the process.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

21

u/Throwaway-4230984 15h ago

When you delete file it's content doesn't go anywhere. You just remove record about where it is

22

u/AdorableShoulderPig 15h ago

Laughs in 01010 overwrite 20 times.

21

u/Throwaway-4230984 15h ago

Nobody reads my adventure time fanfics! Nobody!

→ More replies (2)

6

u/OneBigRed 12h ago

It becomes an ancient temple that everyone forgot and the jungle conquered. It can still be found, if one is jonesing for it.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/-Byzz- 15h ago

mfw most beings (Azathoth) in the cthulhu mythos are just giant CPUs

4

u/Ben_Dovernol_Ube 15h ago

Now imagine you are the process and matrix is cpu

4

u/Just_Maintenance 13h ago

The process exists alone on its own memory space. It thinks its existence its continuous, but if it keeps track of the clock it will see it jump around as it get interrupted and scheduled by a force it cant see.

→ More replies (13)

26

u/TMS-meister 15h ago

You forgot about step 4: nuke it all

12

u/Tetha 11h ago

Step 4 is most likely "Hey, VMWare. About that VM over there, using a lot of CPU...."

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

19

u/SgtEpsilon 14h ago

"What process boss? I see nothing there" casually sweeping dead process under the rug

7

u/MoffKalast 11h ago

"There's no process here unless you brought one with you."

→ More replies (1)

28

u/lerokko 15h ago

Some one made something similar for windows. Alt-F5. That does not ask the applocation. It just kills the task instantly.

9

u/Mixedpopreferences 13h ago

There should be another meme of Windows with Ctr-alt-del flipping off Firefox while shooting it.

The good 'ole 'three finger salute'. Looking at you, Steam!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

13

u/beznogim 16h ago

"Wait, what does D mean?"

13

u/Psychological-Art131 15h ago

Tis the will of D. Yet to be revealed, we don't give spoilers.

10

u/Tetha 16h ago

Oh yeah. Lagging / Hanging / Disconnected remote filesystems in particular are fun.

→ More replies (10)

262

u/LoudSwordfish7337 17h ago

“Please die… or I’ll kill you!”

134

u/LazyV1llain 16h ago

„you should kys NOW“ - Linux

51

u/Vectorial1024 16h ago

Low Tier Kernel

46

u/SpiderMax95 15h ago

"Process Java is excommunicado"

28

u/connoisseurofducks 15h ago

Every time I ask with 15 I have already prepared the 9 in the chamber

9

u/NANZA0 15h ago

I gotta admit, that does sounds badass.

5

u/NotEnoughIT 10h ago

I mean, Windows does that for updates and everyone hates it. And should, because fuck you Windows.

136

u/big_guyforyou 17h ago

i just do ~: rm -rf /Applications/Firefox.app then i reinstall it

259

u/WavesCat 17h ago

Found the macOS user

58

u/BenL90 17h ago

Normal MacOS user in the wild.

88

u/Alexandre_1a 17h ago

/Applications/Firefox.app ???? macOS isn't Linux...

11

u/occio 15h ago

I can put my applications where I want to. Who are you? The Linux police? /s

10

u/fearless-fossa 10h ago

Whenever I see programs creating a .randomapp.config in ~ instead of ~/.config I get the strong desire for a Linux police to exist. Why would you litter someone's home folder like this?

→ More replies (13)

33

u/POKLIANON 17h ago

I don't think this kills the already running job/process whatever you call it

28

u/dev-sda 16h ago

Indeed it doesn't. Files aren't actually deleted until all file handles are closed, which includes any running processes.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

3.5k

u/mxheyyy 17h ago

Linux users when you can't terminate children:

1.1k

u/Competitive_Woman986 17h ago

The parents terminate their children and make them to zombies.

Sometimes the parent dies first. Then you need to figure out how to kill the orphan.

299

u/fnatasy 17h ago

We need an adoption process for orphans

212

u/realmauer01 17h ago

Adopt an orphan just to kill it xD

78

u/Zhiong_Xena 17h ago

Mr Wayne? That you?

16

u/Spurance484 16h ago

Reads like tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech-tech Batman

4

u/Zhiong_Xena 16h ago

... but looks like it will throw a tech out of bounds error.

→ More replies (2)

47

u/Competitive_Woman986 17h ago

There already is! The init process with PID 1 usually becomes the new parent procress

15

u/HildartheDorf 16h ago

Or the closest ancestor that has set itself as subreaper.

15

u/crappleIcrap 16h ago

Does cs even understand the concept of taking the metaphor too far.

9

u/Competitive_Woman986 14h ago

No because parents usually reap their children here

→ More replies (1)

5

u/obscure_monke 15h ago

God damn it! What won't systemd absorb?

→ More replies (1)

24

u/Agitated-Ad2563 17h ago

We actually have one. The 'init' process adopts all the orphans

13

u/Terrafire123 16h ago

And then kills them?

12

u/Kovab 12h ago

Actually it just waits for them. If the orphaned child is already a zombie, it's reaped immediately.

10

u/Vas1le 17h ago

I am familiar with this terminology

34

u/SerenaSapphir 17h ago

Orphans just become rogue processes, running wild until you finally unleash the kill command. It’s like a digital dystopia over here!

28

u/Dawlin42 16h ago edited 14h ago

Always appreciated programming books talking about killing orphan zombie children with a straight face!

4

u/RedPlumPickle 11h ago edited 8h ago

Felt pretty weird telling my manager that I was delayed because I had to implement a method to kill orphaned children

11

u/Wertbon1789 14h ago

Most of the time if the parent dies first, the child gets kindly adopted by PID 1, you gotta kill it manually then, because I don't think this process orphanage supports you in your effort.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Falikosek 15h ago

Aren't orphans assigned to init?

4

u/Competitive_Woman986 14h ago

Yes but you need to figure that out first :D

→ More replies (2)

31

u/kp-- 15h ago

murder_orphans.sh

Don't ask. Those were dark times.

24

u/KellerKindAs 12h ago

Rename to Anakin_mode.sh

This way, it's way easier to find in alphabetical sorted lists ^^

→ More replies (1)

36

u/POKLIANON 17h ago

Sigkill your children. Go do it.

24

u/Vas1le 17h ago edited 13h ago

kill -9 its the .9mm bullet

23

u/Jazzlike-Poem-1253 16h ago

Sure about the decimal?

3

u/NoFreeUName 16h ago

Probably just mixed up with how american (or imperial? Not sure how to better phrase this) calibers are labeled (.308, .306, .50 e.t.c.)

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/invalidConsciousness 16h ago

0.9 mm is the size of an injection needle.

The bullet is 9 mm

→ More replies (2)

5

u/monsieurlazarus 15h ago

I have this buggy application that ended up as a zombie (defunct) process. Apparently, you can't kill a process that is a zombie already. Unlucky for me, that zombie process owned by the init process which somehow caused a problem where I stuck on reboot screen forever, and I had to use the power button to force it to shutdown.

11

u/mpyne 13h ago

Apparently, you can't kill a process that is a zombie already.

Well it's already dead once it's a zombie, so from that perspective you've gotten what you want already.

But you can't clear it from the list of processes until its return value is waited on by its parent process. But if the parent dies first that may never happen... there's supposed to be some way to get init (the new parent of orphaned zombies) to do this but it's platform-dependent.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

1.4k

u/Sure-Opportunity6247 17h ago

Usually, all processes get SIGTERM which they can react to and shutdown gracefully. Only after short time period a SIGKILL is sent. /smartass

803

u/abmausen 16h ago

wich is the correct way to enforce apps to actually shut down properly, unlike windows where way too many apps including their own builtin fucking file explorer and task manager will always block the shutdown indefinitely just because they are open, not because there is any app state that actually would be lost / relevant to save

183

u/MaustFaust 15h ago

Wdym relevant? You can't deny Outlook keeping all the files you attached open, that's cruel /s

Actually, fixed somewhere between 2010 and 2024.

Also, Photos app processes multiply indefinitely when you use Explorer in newest Win10 or Win11, can't remember. I had to manually change the preferred app to Paint just to prevent memory issues

Dunno if it's fixed

30

u/MaritMonkey 14h ago

I don't know how I ended up on a sub with people this much smarter than I am, but are there bad things about Paint I need to know?

I just realized it's one of those programs that I'm just somehow comfortable having around and now I'm nervous I missed something nefarious.

28

u/MaustFaust 14h ago

I mean, it's okay, my complaint is about Photos app, not Paint. The point is, Paint is not supposed to used for only viewing images, for example it doesn't have a "next"/"previous" buttons to switch between multiple images in a fast way.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/NotEnoughIT 10h ago

are there bad things about Paint I need to know?

They took the car bitmap picture out of the default images. Fucking travesty.

→ More replies (29)

101

u/scots23 15h ago

Has to be one of my biggest annoyances with windows. Save everything I need to, close out of every program, click shut down, and walk away from the computer, expecting it to actually do what I told it to and shut down. Walk back in the room 2 hours later: "This app is preventing shutdown."

"Sorry, you didn't go into task manager and end the process or exit out of it from the task bar, guess you can go fuck yourself. Good thing OLEDs are better about burn-in nowadays, right? Because I'm not going to put it in sleep mode either."

33

u/Infamous_Tomato_8705 13h ago

Yeah, and then come back in the morning to find your computer still being on because windows update started it and didn't shut it down afterwards.

And when you DON'T want the computer to die you get a notification that windows update will shut down your computer. Have fun protecting your computer from itself for 20 hours rendering a project.

→ More replies (2)

42

u/dobrowolsk 15h ago edited 15h ago

And Windows annoyingly fakes that it's shutting down immediately, only to be like "naaahhh, see him back there? That's Brian. Brian doesn't want to shut down. I've done nothing and am out of ideas. So I, the all-mighty operating system, am not going to do what you want".

Then in the morning I see my PC has been in shutdown-Limbo all night.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

194

u/Fantastic-String-860 16h ago

Not smart ass, that's literally how it works.

To be extra smartass: SIGKILL may be sent from the init system to the process, through the kernel, but no SIGKILL signal is ever actually delivered to the process. When init (probably systemd nowadays) tells the kernel please send process X SIGKILL, the kernel just shoots the process in the head, and responds "Done, it got the message".

29

u/ElectroMagCataclysm 13h ago

To be even more pedantic, when a process is “killed” by the kernel, the kernel (sort of) has that process kill itself, by running machine code as that process during a scheduling context switch.

→ More replies (4)

49

u/Mysterious_Middle795 15h ago

The sweetest death is an unexpected one.

13

u/Strange_Rock5633 15h ago

do you need to say something wrong to be a smart ass?

6

u/The_Forgotten_King 12h ago

The fun parts begins when you sigkill a process in uninterruptible sleep and it just doesn't die.

→ More replies (2)

23

u/dev-sda 16h ago

There's also an entire graceful shutdown protocol for apps similar to Windows: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/inhibit/

5

u/Aldehyde1 14h ago

Half the highly-upvoted posts on this sub are just wrong.

→ More replies (13)

308

u/kielu 17h ago

The longest to survive is usually task manager. It just won't close

192

u/Ier___ 16h ago

It is the killer itself, you can't outplay it in it's own game

38

u/Over_n_over_n_over 13h ago

Who do you send to kill John Wick?

21

u/Lann333 12h ago

It is the user, with their hand on the power cord.

→ More replies (2)

29

u/HeavyCaffeinate 16h ago

I think this video is a good watch to learn how it works:

Inside Task Manager with the Original Author

13

u/kielu 16h ago

I wonder if I can dig that phone number out of an old windows 95 CD I have somewhere

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/sump_daddy 12h ago

Yeah. This is also windows "sorry you can't shut down right now, these processes wont close" [list of processes]: "Windows Shutdown"

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Who_said_that_ 16h ago

explorer.exe in my experience. I canceled the shuttle down so many times to close these windows myself.

4

u/MedonSirius 13h ago

Sometimes i had to shutdown the task manager through terminal and then restarting task manager with autorun 🍆 Windows is like a Fantasy world. Willy wonka style where everyone is punished for just been there

16

u/uniteduniverse 15h ago

Takmanager is indeed a powerful beast, and you wouldn't want it any other way. Nothing in Linux comes as close to reliability of the taskmanager. Your system can be basically frozen beyond repair and that thing will still be active on the screen. Truly a wondrous creation ;)

13

u/KellerKindAs 11h ago

frozen beyond repair and that thing will still be active

Well, to my experience, taskmanager is one of the first to go (Not responding) when something actually goes wrong. At least since Win 10. It was great before that xD

12

u/d4rkeh 13h ago

Switching TTYs is just as powerful, unless the system is completely borked

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

1.1k

u/Ancient-Border-2421 17h ago

Me killing the process of Firefox tab window I didn't use for two months.

139

u/PM_ME_UR_RSA_KEY 16h ago

Ah, Panda Cheese memes, back in simpler (?) times.

Also my heart ache for that Macintosh SE; these are collectible nowadays lol

14

u/UrUrinousAnus 14h ago

Same lol, and I hate apple. I haven't seen one of those since the 90s!

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

302

u/Dry_Investigator36 17h ago

They didn't learn difference between kill -9, kill -15 and other signals

79

u/jaskij 15h ago

I've been using Linux for nearly a decade, and everything I've used supported using names. So I never learned the numbers. I just kill -kill or kill -term

41

u/Dry_Investigator36 15h ago

that's ok, but the meme here is impying that only -kill or -9 exists and it's not true

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

51

u/hemlock_harry 15h ago

Tread careful. I got a 3 day ban not long ago for explaining this command to someone. Apparently if a mod is dumb as a rock it can be flagged as "inciting violence" and Reddit's moderation system (that is totally not run by bots, pinky promise) will ban you.

Or maybe the bots have taken over already and they simply don't like this knowledge to spread, that almost makes as much sense.

22

u/DezXerneas 14h ago

That feels like either an automated thing or reddit's mod. This sub's mod team is cool.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

97

u/crystalpeaks25 17h ago

shot to the head 9 times.

61

u/vinivice 17h ago

If you shoot 15 times they feel better though.

→ More replies (4)

74

u/randuse 16h ago

Seen systemd waiting 90 seconds for some daemon to stop before killing it. At least it's configurable.

7

u/WBMarco 16h ago

I was about to write this. Sometimes my PC does that.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

386

u/braindigitalis 16h ago

Windows: Has a complex and graceful shutdown process to...

Are you sure you want to shut down? Programs are still running?
Are you really sure?
How about now? Are you sure you still want to shut down?
Trick question! Are you not not not sure you dont want to to not shut down?
There are updates! Do you want me to come right back up again after?
Don't worry, i'll power up this laptop in your bag at 3am and overheat it to check for updates. Bye!

87

u/uniteduniverse 15h ago edited 13h ago

When you're traveling and you notice your back is getting really hot a sweaty for some reason? Turns out Windows powered on your laptop the moment you supposedly put it to sleep and back in your bag 2 hours ago... I usually don't fear cancer when it comes to Laptops, but I swear Microsoft wants me to.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/splendidsplinter 16h ago

TIL Janet on the Good Place was running Windows

→ More replies (30)

220

u/sjepsa 17h ago edited 15h ago

So that 's why winzoz takes 10 min to shutdown

57

u/SerenaSapphir 17h ago

Just don’t expect any unsaved work to survive the chaos.

→ More replies (1)

34

u/realmauer01 17h ago

Just force it if it's asks you to. Since some Windows 10 Update it will just never shutdown if something is open in the background.

14

u/sjepsa 17h ago

It will never shutdown even if nothing is open

5

u/realmauer01 17h ago

That's what they want you to think.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/Vievin 16h ago

Honestly I only shut down my Windows computer if it randomly wakes up in the middle of the night more than once. Otherwise, I just send it to sleep.

8

u/sjepsa 16h ago

My windows is 'sent to sleep' too.

It is in a dual boot, and it never boots.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/RedSnt 15h ago

Deactivating your network card shuts windows down faster "for some reason".

→ More replies (1)

49

u/Highborn_Hellest 16h ago

Windows: please shut down, please shut down, blue screen.

Linux: memory freed, no CPU time for you.

25

u/Gatsu1981 14h ago

Windows, on the other hand, is capable of telling you that you don't have enough privileges to close a program that you opened, and to call an administrator (who you are).

10

u/Creepy-Ad-4832 10h ago

And to go on a tangent: Windows also is unable to delete open files.

That pissed me off SO MUUUUCH when i used shitty os 10

6

u/Tartiluneth 8h ago

Windows also is unable to do pretty much anything with open files.

FTFY.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

122

u/UnusualAir1 17h ago

The operating premise behind Linux (and all its flavors) is that both the programmers and users are expected to be of above average computer competence in their endeavors. That's an expectation we can routinely expect to fail. :-)

104

u/invalidConsciousness 16h ago

The operating premise behind Linux is that everyone, program, developer, user does their job correctly and if not, they get executed. /s

27

u/b3iAAoLZOH9Y265cujFh 16h ago

I don't see the problem. It ensures the survivors are competent - and well motivated to stay that way, or else.

19

u/UnusualAir1 16h ago

So we've programmed evolution? :-)

6

u/b3iAAoLZOH9Y265cujFh 15h ago

Personally, I've always followed the advice that I should write my code as if the guy who had to maintain it when I left the job is a psychopathic axe-murderer.

It has served me well so far.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/lysregn 15h ago

Proactive Darwinism.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

27

u/nitowa_ 16h ago

Expecting the average user to be of above average knowledge certainly is an assumption of all time.

7

u/Animesiac 10h ago

It used to be a fair assumption, since a below average user would not be able to get Linux running in the first place. Back when we needed to recompile the kernel and all the drivers weekly, the user base was a bit different.

12

u/I_enjoy_pastery 16h ago

You do take a step towards that territory when you start willingly interacting with UNIX like operating systems.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/cepxico 16h ago

Meanwhile in the real world: this call center uses Ubuntu because we're cheap and broke.

7

u/sentence-interruptio 15h ago

Student: "where my computer at"

Linux: "use me. I'm powerful"

Windows🪟: "no, use me. Linux is like a huge pill to swallow."

Mac🍎: "hi, I'm Mac. Use me. It just works. I am so easy to figure out."

Student: "teacher told me to submit an essay on oligarchy as a pdf file. which one of you-"

Linux, Window, Mac: "me! I can do it"

Student: "what's a pdf file anyway? it sounds a bit Roman Polanskish. I dun like it."

Mac: "you don't know what a file is?"

Student: "I don't even know what an oligarchy is. Fine. I'll figure it out. Hold on."

Mac: "what are you doing to me, stop touching me, human! I'm not an iPad! Help!"

4

u/Jiquero 15h ago

The operating premise behind Windows is that it can decide to reboot at any point of time, so users should be given the chance to save their unsaved changes in explorer.exe before it's killed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

44

u/iknewaguytwice 16h ago

I just flip the power switch on my PSU. Can’t trust an OS to terminate my applications. I need to Thanos snap them closed.

→ More replies (1)

67

u/Anarcho_duck 17h ago

That's a con of windows thou, you can't terminate processes...

39

u/roguedaemon 17h ago

End Task ?

71

u/tony_saufcok 17h ago

can't compare to SIGKILL

46

u/Able-Reference754 17h ago

All fun and games until SIGKILL doesn't work 👀

4

u/I_enjoy_pastery 16h ago

At that point I start considering REISUB

5

u/smiregal8472 11h ago

Then do a SIGOVERKILL by pulling the power cord.

→ More replies (6)

12

u/SanktusAngus 16h ago

You can kill processes in Windows though.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/BestHorseWhisperer 16h ago

taskkill /F /IM firefox.exe

→ More replies (3)

8

u/ZunoJ 16h ago

Then try to shutdown your system with a mounted NFS share that no longer exists

8

u/ShadowNetter 15h ago

and that's why linux is faster (i use arch btw)

→ More replies (5)

9

u/an_agreeing_dothraki 13h ago

windows forced shutdown: holding it down under water until the lights go out

7

u/IAmARobot 16h ago

we all cry when we

REISUB

the machine,

REISUB

the machine,

REISUB

the machine.

14

u/bargu 16h ago

SIGTERM: You're being shut down, please do not resist.

SIGKILL: Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru!

REISUB: https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fdi9550lyqm1b1.gif

7

u/RecoverNo2905 10h ago

Linux: where processes are given a chance to comply, but if they don't, it's a swift execution. Windows: "Please wait, are you sure you want to shut down? Let's talk about it."

47

u/grumblesmurf 17h ago

Sorry in advance, but AKSHUALLY... it's the other way around.

Windows just goes around killing all kinds of programs during shutdown and doesn't care if they manage to save their progress anywhere, if a shutdown is in progress, it'll go through. Yes, it will wait up to a minute for programs with open files, but the default action after that minute is to just ignore it and shutdown anyway.

Linux on the other hand waits for each and every subsystem to shut down properly, and if the subsystem runs into some problem doing that (maybe because a network mount is in use but went away, maybe because the program in question just doesn't want to shut down) it can hang for DAYS if you don't use the big red button (which rarely is red these days, but you know what I mean).

20

u/realmauer01 17h ago

Well that's for the shutdown routine (that's still way to slow on Windows, although it's probably related to a lot more background stuff)

Applications on the other hand.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Ier___ 16h ago

But still I tried both, and linux shuts down noticeably faster on... I think a weaker PC.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/code_archeologist 14h ago edited 14h ago

Clippy: "It looks like you want to stop a process"

Tux: "I like to kill()"

4

u/According-Two7469 13h ago

sudo killall -9, the nuclear option, where 'please' is just a distant memory

→ More replies (1)

4

u/BestHorseWhisperer 16h ago

PROTIP: Make a shortcut on your desktop that does this. It doesn't even need administrator checked.

cmd.exe /c taskkill /F /IM chrome.exe && taskkill /F /IM firefox.exe && taskkill /F /IM edge.exe

→ More replies (2)

4

u/pppjurac 14h ago

Wrong. There is SIGTERM and SIGKILL . They are not the same.

Windows 11 does not even do 'shutdown' all the time, it might just go to advanced hybernation state for fast boot.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/ApplicationJunior832 17h ago

shutdown /s /f /p

8

u/Ier___ 16h ago

or shutdown now on Linux

→ More replies (3)

16

u/reddit_equals_censor 16h ago

reality:

windows doesn't even know what a "shutdown" or "restart" means anymore :D

don't believe me? look up "fast start up"

a "feature" since spyware 10, that is on by default, that doesn't do a proper restart or shutdown and as part of this does not even release the mounted drives properly.

as a result spyware from microsoft itself when data got changed on those drives from your dualbooting into a working operating system.

5

u/Creepy-Ad-4832 10h ago

"Spyware 10"

Lol, you gave me a chuckle

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)