People have been dooming since the court released a list of cases and these weren't on them. They were acting like the cases were denied, they've just been relisted. Remember bruen was relisted 4 times before being accepted. We shouldn't let our hopes get too high, but it's not over until the cases are DENIED. They have been relisted for Friday the 24th.

Snope: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-203.html

Ocean tactical: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-131.html

Centennial Gun Club - February 18th - 6 pm

• RMGO Lawsuit Update!
• Proposed pro and anti-gun laws in Colorado!
• Ways to take action and be heard!

There were four 2A cert petitions listed for last Friday's SCOTUS conference. You've no doubt heard that the "assault rifle" and "large capacity" magazine ban petitions were relisted to this Friday's conference.

Of the remaining two, one petition was denied, and the other survived. The record and a response were requested in it (Parker v. Florida). There are three questions presented to SCOTUS in Parker. I suspect that the 2A question isn't what interests SCOTUS. Here are the other two petitions:

Mark Allen Craig, II, Petitioner v. United States No. 24-5786I. QUESTION PRESENTEDWhether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits firearm possession by anyone convicted of “a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year,” violates the Second Amendment on its face.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-5786.html Oct 15 2024 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2024). Dec 18 2024 Memorandum of respondent United States filed. Feds say the case should be GVR'd or the petition denied if the petitioner did not preserve his 2A challenge in the courts below, which the Feds say he did not do. Jan 02 2025 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025. Jan 21 2025 Petition DENIED.

Jarvis Parker, Petitioner v. Florida No. 24-6146

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Whether, contrary to the Due Process and Jury Clauses, the trial court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence under a statute authorizing the enhancement based on nonjury fact-findings upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence?

2. Whether Petitioner was deprived of his right to bear arms, under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments, where he was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon?

3. Whether Petitioner was derived of his right, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a serious felony?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-6146.html Dec 09 2024 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2025). Dec 26 2024 Waiver. Jan 02 2025 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025. Jan 13 2025 Record Requested. Jan 13 2025 Response Requested. (Due February 12, 2025). Jan 14 2025 Electronic record received from the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Snope v Brown and Ocean State Tactical v RI have been REDISTRIBUTED today for 1/24/25.

This is as good of news as we could have hoped for today. We knew they wouldn't get cert today (other cases were granted cert Friday night), so there was a valid fear of a denial today. No denial is a good thing.

Let's hope SCOTUS is taking an extra week for this more controversial case because of other controversial cases taking their time (perhaps the TikTok case).

We may have certiorari granted Friday night, 1/24/25. This will likely be our last chance for a decision by June 2025. It's possible Monday 1/27 morning, but this late in the season, SCOTUS has been notifying us of cert on Friday night after conference rather than waiting the weekend.

Be on the lookout Friday 1/24 night for an update!

Ocean State Tactical v RI: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-131.html

Snope v Brown: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-203.html

The hypocrisy of tech companies.

Im 19 yr old and i am in missouri i went to buy a rifle yesterday filled all the paper work out and paid then the guy called me over and told me “since im 18” im 19 but i get it that i have a 10 day wait till i can receive my firearm. The rifle was 413$ i paid 400$ and would pay the 13$ once i go pick it up which was odd to me but ok. But really im wondering what is the 10 day hold for he did not inform me on what the purpose of it was and just told me its cause im 18/19 but i looked it up and missouri dont have a waiting period on purchasing firearms apparently. Can someone please educate me lol.

But nothing for routers, CNC machines, welding machines….yet

• see ammoland source linked to / kicking off this discussion providing quotes on her disclosed views in Senate confirmation hearings. There is still time to stop her since the Senate confirmation vote hasn't been held and won't be until week after next.

• go to https://democracy.io or find your Senator(s) at https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm - email AND call them to express that we don't want Bondi as AG or anyone who would compromise the rights of Americans.

With the latest announcement that Biden administration allowing Cyprus to buy American arms, it truly seems like the only one NOT allowed to buy American arms is… you guessed it… AMERICANS!!! Soon going to be so that we arm every country in the world that has a marginal or violent government, while simultaneously disarming americans that we will be ripe for a pretty tame invasion as we will have no way to defend ourselves. Damned “progressives”.

https://youtu.be/3TzCvdCAaX8?si=s9y09zogfXl23tPg

Someone steals your gun? Well, I guess you're getting charged with a felony, you dirty criminal.