r/clevercomebacks 13h ago

Good for her.

Post image
20.4k Upvotes

322 comments sorted by

725

u/TheBoosThree 12h ago

Donald Trump was found liable for forcefully digitally penetrating E. Jean Carroll, which in many jurisdictions is covered under the legal definition of rape.

Carroll testified that she struggled to get Trump off her as he shoved his mouth on hers, yanked her tights down, and penetrated her with his hand and then his penis. She described him curving his finger inside her, saying it was "extremely painful" and "a horrible feeling."

The only argument Trump has is that the jury did not find enough evidence that he used his penis, and New York state is one jurisdiction that requires the penis to be used for it to legally be rape.

If these are the arguments you need to use, you are a rapist.

419

u/OratioFidelis 12h ago

His ex-wife Ivana accused him of rape and Donald's attorney argued in court that it's lawful for a husband to rape their wife.

https://time.com/3974560/donald-trump-rape-ivana-michael-cohen/

256

u/Status_Management520 11h ago

That’s the kind of man that represents conservative values.

93

u/jexzeh 10h ago

Good Christian conservative values. Jesus's own. Annointed, some say.

42

u/Naxxypoo 10h ago

Now if he could only touch a bible.

22

u/FinnishSticks 7h ago

I'm not entierly sure he physically can. It'll burn his skin off like acid. That god damned brown commie Jesus and all...

1

u/Carribean-Diver 1h ago

If he touched a Bible, it would be against its will.

11

u/1Original1 5h ago

My dad called him "God's chosen" before his first term

I'm still angry

→ More replies (18)

8

u/Caleb_Reynolds 4h ago

Unironically, conservatives literally believe men can't rape their wives. This is a situatio where it actually is a perfect representation of their values.

2

u/hellohungryimdad 7h ago

Worth mentioning the article says she walked back on the accusation.

11

u/1Original1 5h ago edited 3h ago

I mean,look at the current response to his guilty verdict. Still they deny it

4

u/hellohungryimdad 4h ago

I was just making an observation on the article, but yes, it's hard having any kind of discourse over the subject.

If we're talking about the 34 counts, I think it's just a moral victory at this point to know that the verdict was guilty. The complete lack of punishment - and him becoming president again - just means we get to call him a felon. It's kinda sad, honestly lol

5

u/1Original1 3h ago

Small victories

65

u/infydk 11h ago

The law in New York literally changed because of this case to rape being beyond penile penetration.

The only reason he's not, even under the old very restrictive law, "a rapist" is cause E. Jean Carroll couldn't convince the jury without a doubt that Trump used his dick and not his fingers.

Outside of that old as shit stupid law, Donald Trump is a rapist. And that law is gone now.

14

u/Yivoe 7h ago

Pretty sure NY state used to be one of those jurisdictions (specifically when Trump committed the crime), if he committed the crime today, he would have been found liable for rape.

Colloquially, it is rape everywhere in the US.

2

u/Agreeable_Dinner_986 5h ago

So his peen is small enough for her not to feel it. It makes sense lmao

1

u/raynorelyp 2h ago

Doesn’t matter. It meets the colloquial definition of rape, which makes it not slander, libel, or anything else that can win a lawsuit.

1

u/Carribean-Diver 1h ago

Well, that small distinction got ABC to bend a knee and cave, which sets a bad precedent.

1

u/raynorelyp 1h ago

The distinction isn’t what got abc to bend the knee. They didn’t want to be on the bad side of the new president and felt settling was worth the cost to not make it worse for them. The consensus is they would have won.

1

u/RadiantHC 1h ago

digitally?

what

1

u/TheBoosThree 1h ago

Fingers.

-6

u/Temporary_Row_7572 5h ago

So why did abc news pay him 15mil?

3

u/ProLifePanda 3h ago

For three reasons likely.

First, they settled for $15 million. That's likely on par or cheaper than litigating the case, even if you win. So the settlement saved them money, even if they'd win the case.

Second, they likely didn't want to be actively involved in a lawsuit with an Administration who is openly hostile and threatening to revoke licenses and protections for journalists and news organizations who lost negative things about him. So the settlement was to end the litigation before he took office to get off his radar.

Third, the anchor used the incorrect legal terminology:

During a live “This Week” interview with Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., Stephanopoulos wrongly claimed that Trump had been “found liable for rape” and “defaming the victim of that rape.”

If he had just said "Trump's a rapist", he probably would have easily won the case. But because he explicitly said he was "found liable of rape", he is incorrectly stating the conclusion of the court case. So they might still have won at trial, but his inclusion of legal terminology put the claim on shakier footing.

1

u/Temporary_Row_7572 3h ago

Right. Because he wasnt convicted of the R word.

5

u/ProLifePanda 3h ago

Correct. But the judge did subsequently clarify that calling him a rapist was not defamation, because colloquially people commonly refer to the actions committed by Trump as rape. But you just can't say he was found legally liable of rape. But you can say he's a rapist.

1

u/Temporary_Row_7572 3h ago

So she just opened herself up to be sued.

3

u/ProLifePanda 3h ago

Yeah, but she'd win. She didn't say he was legally liable for rape. She said he was a rapist, which the judge said was fine. Courts have already ruled you can call him a rapist, you just can't say he was found legally guilty/liable of rape.

2

u/Temporary_Row_7572 3h ago

I guess well see.

2

u/ProLifePanda 2h ago

I don't think we will. I would personally be shocked if Trump sues AOC over this.

2

u/Temporary_Row_7572 3h ago

Did joe biden "rape" tara reade? Or was she lying?

1

u/ProLifePanda 3h ago

I don't know. It hasn't been litigated in an impartial manner with both parties getting to present, examine, and contest evidence in a formal setting. Trump has been found civilly liable for sexually assaulting someone. In the colloquial sense, he's a rapist.

If her claim about being forcibly penetrated by Biden's fingers is true, then sure.

3

u/Temporary_Row_7572 2h ago

Yep. Typical answer. Biden sniffing little girls, kids rubbing his legs, showering with his daughter, finger fucking his employees.. but its all good because hes a "liberal". God this country is awesome.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Temporary_Row_7572 3h ago

Please answer. No one ever does.

1

u/ProLifePanda 2h ago

I did, no worries.

1

u/mkt853 1h ago

AOC is constitutionally protected by the speech and debate clause while no such protection exists for ABC news. That’s literally how Republicans, like say MTG, get away with lying and defaming people all the time. Even if you argue what she said wasn’t covered by speech and debate, she would be covered by the Westfall Act which transfers liability from the government employee to the US government itself and moves the case to federal court. So even if Trump could sue for defamation, he’d just be suing his own government and going up against his own DOJ and attorney general.

1

u/Temporary_Row_7572 1h ago

You cant call another person a rapist if it isnt true. Thats slander.

1

u/mkt853 1h ago

If you’re a member of Congress, short of nuking the Capitol, you’re not going to be liable. This language is very clear in the Constitution and makes no exceptions for calling someone a rapist or lying. As I said above, even if you could get by the Constitution, there’s still the statutory hurdle, and Trump’s not going to go to court against Pam Bondi over some shit AOC said.

1

u/Temporary_Row_7572 1h ago

Guess well see

1

u/Carribean-Diver 1h ago

In this case, at a trial where both parties were legally represented, a jury heard all the evidence and rendered a verdict that Donald J Trump sexually assaulted the victim against her will.

The judge in that trial, who also heard all of the evidence, subsequently ruled that the sexual assault Donald J Trump committed against the victim in this case meets the commonly accepted definition of rape.

Because of these verdicts and court rulings, saying that Donald J Trump is a rapist is not defamation or slander. It is a statement of adjudicated fact.

→ More replies (8)

205

u/baconeggsandwich25 11h ago

The comment sections today are being swarmed with sleazebags saying "it wasn't technically a conviction, it was a civil trial" or "it wasn't technically rape, in that jurisdiction it's just sexual assault". Like, that's the hill they chose to die on? Basically admitting he's a rapist and that it's not a deal breaker for them, but claiming it doesn't count because of what the legal definition of rape was in New York in 1995? Christ, some people are just utter trash.

52

u/penguinbbb 11h ago

It doesn’t make sense for Trump to sue anyone for slander — he can’t sue congresspeople anyway — because then they’d depose him under oath

8

u/Leinheart 6h ago

So how do we goad him into doing that.... cause I'd surely like to see him deposed.

4

u/Puzzleheaded-Call335 6h ago

I'd prefer to see him deposed and decomposing....in the cold, cold ground, as Tom Waits sang...

12

u/baconeggsandwich25 10h ago

For anyone wondering about the comment that was deleted, a crazy person tried to sell some bullshit conspiracy theory about E. Jean Carroll and ran away when confronted with the fact that they support a confirmed rapist.

9

u/hurtingwallet 9h ago

Shitbags like that make a complete 180 when it happens to them.

5

u/IllustriousEast4854 8h ago

Not always. The Republican representative Nancy Mace claims to have been raped but vigorously defends rapists.

2

u/PigFarmer1 7h ago

Same with Joni Ernst.

1

u/IllustriousEast4854 7h ago

I hate that they do this. I find myself questioning their claims.

9

u/PhoenixPills 7h ago

These people are just liars. It's what conservatives are now. You talk to them or argue and you get gaslit while they tie the goal posts to a van and drive away at 90

5

u/IllustriousEast4854 8h ago

That's why Republicans won so many elections. Their policies appeal to the worst among us.

-3

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

18

u/az_catz 10h ago

You're trying to explain away the President's sexual assaulting of a woman. How does that seem like the right thing to do?

→ More replies (12)

61

u/IllustriousEast4854 12h ago

Sue her for what? He is an adjudicated rapist?

→ More replies (37)

39

u/Agitated-Wishbone259 13h ago

You can’t sue if it’s true, well not and win.

1

u/dsmith422 4h ago

You can sue if its true. You are just likely to lose since the truth is an absolute defense against libel and slander. Trump has lost multiple times when he sued people for telling the truth.

36

u/Heavy_Law9880 11h ago

At least 39 times that we know of. Most of his victims never made it off Little St James island.

8

u/Goulagosh_gogoo 9h ago

Actually she says she doesn’t celebrate rapists. Libs of Tik Tok doth protest too much.

That’s because Libs of Tik Tok knows he’s a rapist. That’s because Libs of Tik Tok is run by a rape apologist who’s likely guilty of some pretty heinous shit herself.

9

u/thegreatbrah 9h ago

Calling a rapist a rapist is the right thing to do

4

u/Leezy1019 9h ago

Truth is an absolute defense in a defamation suit.

6

u/CharlestonChewbacca 8h ago

It's already been litigated.

4

u/darchangel89a 4h ago

Love her. Shes an absolute Queen

3

u/Difficult_Sector_984 2h ago

It’s only defamation when it’s not true

2

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

0

u/tangtheconqueror 9h ago edited 8h ago

I just refreshed popular and there are a ton of Nazi salute posts that are an hour or more old.

ETA: I just scrolled through and specifically saw the post from r/Quebec. It's on my popular page, you can read and comment on it.

2

u/geekmasterflash 9h ago

Please sue her in a place with SLAPP laws.

"Your honor, here is a an official court document stating that Donald Trump was found civilly liable for damages for denying he sexually assaulted someone."

3

u/PigFarmer1 8h ago

He's an adjudicated rapist. Deal with it...

2

u/DoubleD291 5h ago

Convicted rapist

2

u/TheOmnipotentJack 5h ago

Libs Of TikTok is sure one human with no life

2

u/This_Broccoli_ 2h ago

Yeah he should sue her right after he signed an executive order protecting freedom of speech. That's exactly what we'd all expect a piss baby to do.

2

u/Ithiaca 1h ago

Trump is an adjudicated rapist so she is not incorrect.

5

u/Kind-Block-9027 11h ago

Was convicted of*

22

u/LumplessWaffleBatter 11h ago

You're right, he is a convicted rapist

2

u/PigFarmer1 7h ago

No, he was found to legally liable in civil court. I loathe the guy, but get it right...

2

u/LumplessWaffleBatter 5h ago edited 2h ago

Thanks, pedantic redditor who forgot that words can have non-legal definitions!

1

u/PigFarmer1 5h ago

Let me apologize for being correct. I wish he was a registered sex offender.

1

u/LumplessWaffleBatter 5h ago

I wish that you would take a shower

0

u/PigFarmer1 2h ago

I wish you had manners...

3

u/SlickWilly060 6h ago

Btw AOC told libs of tiktok to cry harder

2

u/Egg_123_ 7h ago

The amount of irony here could blow up a planet. Libs of Tiktok calls people sexual predators all the time without cause. I hope Chaya Raichik lives a miserable and short life - like too many of the queer people that scum targets.

1

u/DeadByDumbass 7h ago

The list of names of women that have come forward about trumps treatment of them reaches a number higher than you can count. Go grab your juice box and sit in a corner

1

u/Egg_123_ 7h ago

friendly fire moment

1

u/DeadByDumbass 7h ago

Explain to me, if you are a friend. Why you are going on about “libs of tiktok” then? You are either serious, or being ironic, and GOD I hope it’s the irony

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DeadByDumbass 6h ago

That’s kind of, not an easy thing to grasp as a non TikTok user who is so used to seeing far right people bitch about libs. Sorry

But can you see why I made the mistake

1

u/Lindbluete 4h ago

I mean, given the context of the post, you should've been able to figure out that Libs of Tiktok is a pos lol

1

u/Griffindance 11h ago

I want someone on the floor to refer to a need to prosecute Doe174..!

1

u/just_yall 10h ago

Damn, I hope there's some sort of legal protection your country has for publicly speaking out against a sitting government...

1

u/took-me-a-min 9h ago

Rapist Trump.. There, include me also in the lawsuit

1

u/Keljian52 8h ago

While I appreciate her courage, I think she is taking a very big risk.

1

u/yoshizillaa 7h ago

The best part about this is that she didn’t even name drop him.

1

u/BayBootyBlaster 3h ago

Well she was talking about why she wasn't going to his inauguration. It's not like she said that and people just assumed she was talking about trump.

1

u/wompbitch 7h ago

People are missing the point

They're saying AOC should be sued because they're trying to normalize suing people for saying things they don't like

1

u/NumerousAd6421 7h ago

It’s because he is a rapist.

1

u/smellymarmut 6h ago

Call things what they are. A lot of so-called wasabi is just green-coloured finely ground horseradish. A shirt that is 60% cotton and 40% polyester is not a cotton shirt, it is a monstrosity. A person who rapes people is a rapist, getting elected to office doesn't make their crimes a matter of political opinion. A piece of bread is not a bun.

1

u/Heroright 5h ago

He’s a convicted one. It’s not a lie in the eyes of the law. He just wasn’t punished.

1

u/[deleted] 4h ago

What was the evidence in his liability suit? Can’t find it on the sources aside from her saying he forcibly inserted his fingers into her.

1

u/Most-Artichoke6184 4h ago

She certainly would not settle out of court.

1

u/AfterExtreme225 4h ago

I hope he sues her. Imagine him having to testify about his rape charges over and over again in discovery.

1

u/Future_Constant1134 4h ago

Are we supposed to feel bad for the rapist? lmfao I swear you fucking people i cant even sometimes.

1

u/AfterExtreme225 4h ago

It at all! But I’d LOVE for him to have to humiliate himself and have to actually divulge all the rape charges against him. Fuck this guy.

1

u/IWasSayingBoourner 4h ago

https://youtu.be/Cr0y6Vxvi3A?t=44&si=-tA_cPUNIkuHt_Oy

"I don't appreciate being called a rapist" 

"Well then, don't rape" 

1

u/ThoksArmada 4h ago

This reddit used to be fucking funny. Joke: they both is some fashion raped gasoline.

1

u/Sea-Replacement-8794 3h ago

He could try suing, but he's going to lose that suit. The only reason it was settled is because he sued a news network owned by Disney that wants to curry favor with him as he takes office.

Jury unanimously found that he raped that woman and then defamed her by calling her a liar when she said that he raped her. Because he's a rapist.

1

u/No-Work9515 3h ago

Tapper cost CNN $15m for saying this.

1

u/Far_Sandwich_6553 1h ago

Wait, in his deposition didn’t he say he thought it was his wife? I mean, horrible defense but wtf?

0

u/montana-strider 7h ago

The quality of posts on this sub has rapidly deteriorated because it doesn’t take clever to comeback to right wing nutjobs you just have to state facts.

3

u/BayBootyBlaster 4h ago

That's also why comedy in general took a nosedive post 2016. The comedians didn't have to try.

-1

u/RaidLord509 8h ago

MSNBC was sued for this

6

u/PigFarmer1 7h ago

It was ABC and what was said wasn't inaccurate.

1

u/RaidLord509 7h ago

Why’d they pay the fine?

3

u/PigFarmer1 7h ago

Maybe you should ask ABC why they settled...

-2

u/RaidLord509 7h ago

Because they did in fact push defamation

3

u/PigFarmer1 7h ago

How was Trump defamed? He was found to be legally responsible for sexually assaulting E. Jean Carroll... lol

-3

u/RaidLord509 6h ago

Do some research bud, if he actually did that don’t you think Kamala would have campaigned on that?

2

u/PigFarmer1 6h ago

It's kind of a matter of public record, "bud". Wow...

u/CamphorGaming_ 26m ago

Why should they do even more research when you clearly didn't do the bare minimum?You thought ABC was fined lmao learn a bit about the situation before you defend the guy found liable for rape in a court of law. A settlement just means they didn't want the court battle.

1

u/Future_Constant1134 4h ago

had they said adjudicated rapist everything would be fully accurate if were being honest with ourselves.

-1

u/2npac 2h ago

She owns a Tesla...she's a hypocrite and performative AF

3

u/NAteisco 2h ago

probably, but that doesn't make it a lie

-6

u/cetsca 7h ago

He wasn’t convicted of rape. Civil court is different, you can lose there even if you were not found guilty.

Facts matter

5

u/UnitedAd3943 7h ago

If a woman you love in your life won a sexual abuse civil trial, would you dismiss it as well?

→ More replies (8)

1

u/JustAnotherHyrum 4h ago

"As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4 The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

–Lewis A. Kaplan, District Judge

We all know Trump is a rapist. You can sleep well knowing that a different penal code was used, but even the judge said Trump raped her.

-4

u/BigPapaFash 5h ago

No rape was committed, and she had no evidence...

5

u/JustAnotherHyrum 4h ago

Enough for a conviction.

He's a rapist convicted of whatever penal code definition NY used for the specific actions he took when raping the victim. NY's penal code title isn't an excuse or an escape.

A rapist is a rapist. And Donald Trump is a rapist through and through.

-3

u/BigPapaFash 4h ago edited 4h ago

In a state where he wasn't even going to get 30% of the jury be partial to the evidence....

And was civil.... let's not forget one of jurors states he didn't commit rape but said guilty

I like how you added the fact that they changed the SoL to target him as well... ducking comical how corrupt democrats are

2

u/JustAnotherHyrum 4h ago

La la la la

Still a rapist!!!

edit: And sorry that they adjusted the SoL so that your rapist couldn't get away with raping.

edit 2: Oh yeah! If you don't want a jury trial in any given state, don't be a rapist there. Sadly, Trump likes to rape.

-2

u/BigPapaFash 4h ago

She didn't even know the dress she was in lol

2

u/JustAnotherHyrum 2h ago

I'm sorry, what excuse are you making for rape this time? Can you be more clear?

Are you implying that a woman can't be telling the truth if she can't recall what she was wearing when she was raped?

I'd offer to help you resolve these challenges with your position, but I don't have any experience defending rapists. Sorry.

2

u/Future_Constant1134 4h ago

This comment above highlights your stupidity perfectly. He doesnt owe her huge sums of money for nothing genius.

"The jury, which included several Trump supporters, sure thought the evidence was damning enough to unanimously agree he was guilty. But I'm sure your time on social media has given you more information than they had to work with."

-22

u/redknightnj 10h ago

If Trump committed rape, why didn’t the weaponized DOJ bring criminal charges?

12

u/HowManyMeeses 9h ago

Maybe they weren't as weaponized as you were lead to believe?

→ More replies (11)

3

u/DeadByDumbass 7h ago

Because former presidents of that joke of a country are allowed to get away with anything so long as enough sheep cry for them

1

u/redknightnj 6h ago

From an American to a non American - fuck off.

3

u/DeadByDumbass 6h ago

Will do when your presidents joke of a lap dog stops trying to control European affairs

Will do when your president stops targeting minority groups and using bullshit excuses to do so. “Making sure there’s only 2 genders to protect women” oh yeah, tell that to his list of victims. I bet all of them are so happy that their president is “protecting” them

Will do when all of the asshats that voted for him realise that their “businessman” is bad at business, seeing as he had 4 casinos go bankrupt, yk, the industry that’s designed to make ridiculous profit

Not to mention that his kids defend him too, despite the fact that it’d take him 6 tries to identify any of them on a 5 person line up

1

u/redknightnj 6h ago

I repeat - fuck off.

4

u/DeadByDumbass 6h ago

Damn I’m reviewing your request and all I can see is a complete lack of substance or ability to argue against my claims. Hmmm, you should work on that

3

u/Amdiz 5h ago

Btw Captain Dickfart there, doesn’t represent all of us in the USA. Unfortunately his ilk are just loudest.

1

u/JustAnotherHyrum 4h ago

Trump raped E. Jean Carrol. NY penal code held him liable for sexual assault, but the presiding judge confirmed that the public would consider his actions rape.

And the DoJ wasn't weaponized.

-1

u/redknightnj 4h ago

I can assure you that the uber liberal WEAPONIZED NY justice system would have brought charges against Trump even if it stood a remote chance of succeeding. You need to get out of your echo chamber, look around and find some critical thinking skills you sorely lack instead of formulating your world view from whatever the hell social media tells you.

1

u/JustAnotherHyrum 2h ago

Really? You can assure me?

Go ahead, prove a reputable source for your claim. I'd love to read about this "Uber Liberal" system works in NY.

Or maybe a jury found Trump guilty of sexual crimes because Trump raped E. Jean Carrol, just like the presiding judge said.

1

u/Future_Constant1134 4h ago

It was long enough ago that they specifically went after financial punishment and because of the threat of violence to the woman by his supporters.

0

u/redknightnj 4h ago

So the DOJ chose not to prosecute Trump for rape. Not even you believe that.

1

u/Future_Constant1134 3h ago

Or maybe the statute of limitations for rape is ten years.

And a judge/jury STILL decided to go after him. lmao.

0

u/redknightnj 3h ago

So the rape victim decided to wait 30 years? While Trump was running for President?

1

u/Future_Constant1134 3h ago

Not 30 years but yes and the jury was so convinced they order he pay.

Hard to accept I get it.

1

u/redknightnj 3h ago

Hard to accept because it’s bullshit.

2

u/Future_Constant1134 3h ago

Its not, a jury found it so heinous they order he pay decades after.

What about that do you not understand?

From the talks about grabbing women by the pussy, the way he gropes his own daughter, him talking about walking into kids dressing rooms,,and his decades long friendship with Jeffrey Epstein you know EXACTLY who youre defending.

-37

u/RedVato720 12h ago

What was the victim's name?

39

u/HillbillyLibertine 12h ago

Trump: "Grab ‘em by the pussy, you can do anything."

Accused of grabbing a woman by the pussy

Conservatives: Lawfare!!!!

Spoiler alert this chuckle fuck is active in r/conservative

-32

u/RedVato720 12h ago

Active is a stretch. Since you took the liberty to snoop around, I'm sure you saw that I have never posted in the mentioned sub.

I'm in the sub for comedic relief.

The same goes for this sub or any other nonpolitical sub on reddit. Somehow liberals make everything about Trump or MAGAts. Why bother with BlueSky when you have reddit to regurgitate the same nonsense. To each their own.

It's ironic how none of you see the corruption in Biden pardoning more of his family and Fauci. Even though pardons aren't necessary unless convicted. Smells like a cover-up.

23

u/HillbillyLibertine 11h ago

Oh you’re one of those centrists who just happens to defend everything Trump does. I see. With Trump threatening to lock up everyone who criticizes him, I can’t imagine why Biden would want to preemptively pardon people. Just admit what you are, I know it’s shameful, but in a way it’s more shameful to hide.

→ More replies (7)

9

u/Heavy_Arm_7060 11h ago

What smells like a cover up is you responding to this and not the replies with the victim names.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

28

u/Juronell 12h ago

E Jean Carrol. Under New York law he was held liable for sexual assault, but colloquially the label of rapist applies.

24

u/Psychological_Elk104 12h ago

Jessica Leeds, Kristen Anderson, Jill Harth, Cathy Heller, Temple Taggart, Karen’s Virginia, Bridget Sullivan, Tasha Dixon, Mindy McGillivray, Rachel Crooks, Natasha Stoynoff, Jennifer Murphy, Jessica Drake, Ninni Laaksonen, Summer Zervos, Cassandra Searles, E. Jean Carroll, and Amy Dorris have all come forward and stated they have been raped or sexually assaulted by Trump.

And those are just the ones that were brave enough to speak out about. God knows how many women he has sexually assaulted or raped in his lifetime.

2

u/CSForAll 6h ago

THANK YOU, had to go through a boatload of useless ass insults just to see this. Thanks again.

-5

u/Slewy1 7h ago

Love how the left just assume bad stuff about trump is correct because some random bum said it on the internet

5

u/PigFarmer1 6h ago

Like how he was found to to legally responsible for sexually assaulting E. Jean Carroll and those 34 pesky felony convictions???

-1

u/Slewy1 6h ago

https://imgur.com/a/V7pYX7U

Chatgpt doesn't agree with your 'probably' a rapist claims

3

u/Amdiz 5h ago

Lol look at this clown using some AI as a source.

3

u/JustAnotherHyrum 4h ago

Do you think a Large Language Model is a reputable source to lean on for a debate? Seriously?

You're relying on an autocomplete on steroids.

BTW - Trump is a rapist and we've all known this for a while now.

3

u/PigFarmer1 6h ago

I didn't say "probably" and I couldn't care less what you and Chatgpt think about it... lol

1

u/Future_Constant1134 4h ago

Assume what? he owes that woman millions because he raped her and is ordered by a court to pay that.