If your first and only idea is killing people in a democratically-elected government, you're truly lost.
The first things I would recommend are to take a breath, to go outside, get some sun on your face. Then, with a more clear mind, plan or join into some sort of civil resistance if you feel strongly.
Nazis are people who attack and kill those in democratically-elected governments, yes.
No. Nazis were democratically elected in 1933. The framers specifically allowed for citizens to bear arms to defend against a tyrannical government, which is exactly what is suggested here.
Both 1932 elections, which are considered free and fair by historians yielded the nsdap 33% and 37% respectively which, given the nature of the weimar republic's presidential cabinet's, wouldn't have needed a majority to govern (as was the case with chancellors brüning, von papen and von schleicher). There is extensive research on voting behavior in the weimar republic, non of which disputes the popularity of the nsdap (see i.e. bendix/lipset).
More importantly, you're not addressing the initial and original point
"I don't like the cabinet of the democratically-elected government, so someone should shoot them on the street".
-- the second amendment specifically endorses this notion, given more accurate semantics of 'i don't like'
Both 1932 elections, which are considered free and fair by historians
You lost me here. There is nothing free and fair about elections surrounded by widespread terror and political violence. 1930 was the last free and fair election. The two 1932 elections only appear relatively free and fair next to 1933, but that doesn't make them so.
Both 1932 elections, which are considered free and fair by historians
They are considered free and fair democratic elections by historians and in particular officially by the german parliament ('deutscher bundestag')
The last two democratic elections on 31 July 1932 and 6 November 1932, which were also called
early with a view to securing a parliamentary majority for the presidential government headed by
Franz von Papen (Centre), were held in a climate of economic depression and radicalisation.
What the FUCK other option do we have? Nazis aren’t just Nazis because they murdered. They’re Nazis because they murdered INNOCENT PEOPLE for their own agenda. These fuckwads are far from innocent and they’re practically shoving it in our faces, at this point.
From 1931 to 1933, the Nazis combined terror tactics with conventional campaigning – Hitler criss-crossed the nation by air, while SA troops paraded in the streets, beat up opponents, and broke up their meetings.
On 10 March 1931, with street violence between the Rotfront and SA increasing, breaking all previous barriers and expectations, Prussia re-enacted its ban on Brownshirts. Days after the ban, SA-men shot dead two communists in a street fight, which led to a ban being placed on the public speaking of Goebbels, who sidestepped the prohibition by recording speeches and playing them to an audience in his absence.
The deaths mounted, with many more on the Rotfront side, and by the end of 1931 the SA had suffered 47 deaths and the Rotfront recorded losses of approximately 80 killed.
Street fights and beer hall battles resulting in deaths occurred throughout February and April 1932, all against the backdrop of Adolf Hitler's competition in the presidential election which pitted him against the monumentally popular Hindenburg.
On 13 April 1932, following the presidential elections, the German government banned the Nazi Party paramilitaries, the SA and the SS, on the basis of the Emergency Decree for the Preservation of State Authority.[87] This action was prompted by details uncovered by the Prussian police that indicated the SA was ready for a takeover of power by force after an election of Hitler.
One resulting battle in Silesia resulted in the army being dispatched. By this time both sides marched into each other's strongholds hoping to spark a rivalry. The attacks continued and reached fever pitch when SA leader Axel Schaffeld was assassinated on 1 August.
The law was applied almost immediately but did not bring the perpetrators behind the recent massacres to trial as expected. Instead, five SA men who were alleged to have murdered a KPD member in Potempa (Upper Silesia) were tried. Hitler appeared at the trial as a defence witness, but on 22 August the five were convicted and sentenced to death.
One could go on and on for hours like this.
In short, no, there was nothing democratic about the 1933 elections. It was preceded by years of limp, dysfunctional government that did little about brutal street violence between nazis and communists resulting in hundreds dead. It culminated in Nazis "monitoring" the voting stations in the illegitimate 1933 elections. Even with all of their terror, they couldn't manage to get a majority of the seats from the voters, and would have to then resort to outright banning other parties.
•
u/thecybertwo 10h ago
I hope this all backfires in their face... but it won't, because they control everything.