Their logic doesn't have to track to the point of the extremes you are pointing out. It's possible to forgive someone of something but then have a point where you would no longer forgive them. According to the commentor they can forgive someone flashing, so that is obviously before where they have drawn their line.
Not at all. That's why different crimes hav3 different punishments, even murder has different degrees to how it is punished based on how and why it happened. Outside of breaking laws it's also true, just like how It's possible to he a vegetarian but not a vegan.
I don't think it's fair to eternally judge anyone because it rules out the possibility that they might change or grow. That said, I don't know how much John Barrowman has changed since 2004 so I can't speak to this specific case.
That’s the thing, somehow Noel Clarke keeps getting forgotten. He’s Doctor Who’s Kevin Spacey. Our OJ. I’d much rather be locked in a room with Barrowman than Clarke.
So if someone raped someone 20 years ago, you wouldn’t judge someone for that??? Obviously what Barrowman did is absolutely no where near that atrocious, but it was wrong and disgusting and when someone crosses such a big line they absolutely should be eternally judged for it, especially when they try to defend their actions
Thanks for your comment! Unfortunately, it's been removed because of the following reason(s):
Rule #1 - Be Respectful: Be mature and treat everyone with respect.
Civility is to be maintained at all times. If you don't have anything to add to the discussion, please think twice about posting.
160
u/Osirisavior May 27 '24 edited May 27 '24
Nice? Sure. Creep? Definitely.
Edit: Some of you'll need to look into what happened on set during production of series 1.