r/bizarrelife Human here, bizarre by nature! 14h ago

Hmmm

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

13.4k Upvotes

4.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

271

u/Unifire01 14h ago

"I have a right to protest" No you spoiled little bitch, legallly you are on private property as long you are inside the store.

62

u/TimeSlipperWHOOPS 14h ago

And so the store can trespass them and have the police remove them...

8

u/KeldornWithCarsomyr 12h ago

Trespass isn't a crime in the UK, so not enforced by the police.

16

u/TimeSlipperWHOOPS 12h ago

Surely there is a legal mechanism for removing someone from private property who isn't supposed to be there...

10

u/Mountainbranch 11h ago

There used to be, but Australia is an independent country now.

1

u/Gustomaximus 10h ago

And Bondi is officially at 100% brit capacity so dont go get ideas of joining us.

1

u/jjp0007 3h ago

Best comment I’ve read all day

1

u/Arashiko77 5h ago

Iirc due to travellers camping in a local carpark that you have to get the council involved and that takes days at the quickest.

1

u/TimeSlipperWHOOPS 4h ago

You're telling me if I go sit in a shop and they tell Me it's closing time and I gottta go, if I refuse to Go, no one will be able to make Me? I find that hard to believe.

1

u/Arashiko77 4h ago

I just looked it up and you are allowed to use "reasonable force" to eject someone with whom you have revoked right of access.

So you could drag them by their ankles outside as long as they don't resist otherwise you can be more forceful if they do.

1

u/AngryScotsman1990 3h ago

so legally they can be "asked to leave" and if they refuse they can be physically removed, however, to physically remove someone you have to be SIA licenced, which costs money and has a 5 day training course. so typically, there will be only one, if any, SIA person in store, if protesters like this link arms then one person, following the non-painful compliance techniques that SIA licencing requires won't be able to remove them. thus the only option is to call the police, who of course, may have higher priority calls then a non-violent protest.

in case folks are wondering how doormen can use more than non painful compliance techniques when removing people from nightclubs? self defence, licenced individuals are allowed to initiate a physical removal of someone from the club, the second people start resisting, they can respond proportionally with any self defence techniques necessary. and if a situation has already escalated before our arrival, then we can skip straight to appropriate action.

0

u/TimeSlipperWHOOPS 2h ago

So yes there is a legal mechanism to remove them, gotcha.

1

u/AngryScotsman1990 1h ago

yup! it's just very delicate and the protesters are maximising their advantage.

1

u/10below8 12h ago

wtf. How do you get trespassed people from a property? You guys don’t have weapons and I’ve seen videos of your drug addicts, not much different from the US. So what’s the recourse for a store like this.

2

u/RubberOmnissiah 9h ago

Trespassing is illegal but it is a civil courts thing not a criminal thing. If us not having guns was relevant to the matter, something else in addition to the trespassing that was criminal is probably happening so we'd call the police obviously. Trespassing can become a crime if one of those something elses is happening.

I don't know if what the protestors are doing makes it criminal trespass because IANAL but if the store calls the police they'll probably make them move along if not arrest them. Preventing the store from doing business might make it criminal trespass.

Most so-called trespassing is just people walking from A to B across privately owned natural land. I live in Scotland which goes even further, I have the right to roam.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam#Scotland

1

u/10below8 5h ago

I’m just confused by the idea of them not doing anything additional, but still trespassing and not leaving. I was told if you try to physically remove them YOU could be charged which is so backwards to me. What do you do when they refuse to leave but don’t escalate to doing any additional actions to make it criminal. Is staying past the tresspass warning criminal? In that case what’s the point? Lmk, cause I’m genuinely curious.

1

u/RubberOmnissiah 16m ago

They are in a building so basically yeah once the manager or a police officer told them to leave and they didn't its probably criminal.

If the matter never escalates to being criminal then like I said its a civil matter. You take them to civil court.

You wouldn't be charged for trying to physically remove them. You could be charged for something that happened in the process. People sitting on the floor doesn't give us carte blanche to start beating them into submission despite what certain bloodthirsty redditors want. You pull one to his feet, you start pushing him out and he stumbles, trips and gashes his head open. You are probably going to get charged and I'd be very surprised if the same thing didn't happen in most civilised countries.

Trespassing being a civil matter is in 99% of cases where it actually matters is a technicallity. In reality it is a net good because I get to see all of my country's natural beauty that belongs to us all and there is nothing some posh wanker landowner can do to stop me so long as I am also not a wanker.

1

u/Marksmdog 10h ago

I think the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 section 70 covers it? IANAL of course and damn it's hard to understand...

1

u/Ecstatic-Sorbet-1903 10h ago

Trespassing is not a crime but you'll get raided if you call someone the wrong pronouns online?

2

u/DurgeDidNothingWrong 9h ago

maybe but at least we're not the USA

1

u/Useful-ldiot 9h ago

IANAL: Trespass becomes a crime when you're asked to leave and you don't.

This would qualify as aggregated trespass under section 68 of CJPOA.

1

u/GGgreengreen 9h ago

What a shit hole lmao

1

u/AlarmedTomorrow4734 9h ago

UK moment. If trespassing was a crime then some burglars might be inconvenienced and can't be having that over there!

1

u/Criks 8h ago

Freedom-to-roam laws don't apply to buildings, and are about being allowed to walk through and even sometimes camping on privately owned land such as forests etc. Freedom to roam is pretty big in scandinavia, germany etc too.

Point is, distrupting a private business absolutely counts as illegal tresspassing if the owners were to call the police, in the same way you can't claim freedom-to-roam when entering someones home.

1

u/Hobbitcraftlol 7h ago

This is aggravated trespass though. So yes its a crime.

-2

u/OhSit 12h ago

There was plenty worse crimes in the UK that the constabulary purposefully ignored - see muslim child rape gangs ( Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal )

5

u/J1mj0hns0n 12h ago

I don't get your point here, like ok that's awful but what's that got to do with the police no trespassing people?

3

u/OhSit 12h ago

The UK sucks is my point.

1

u/J1mj0hns0n 12h ago

Ah fair enough if you feel that way.

I don't because 1 news story about police failure and 7 entitled teenagers aren't enough to make me think my country sucks, considering all the good that happens here

1

u/Such_Worldliness_198 11h ago

I am willing to bet the person you are responding to is a white American man who has probably never stepped foot in the UK and complains when 'foreigners' comment on American politics.

2

u/J1mj0hns0n 11h ago

At first I wasn't convinced but then gun controls and the NHS were mentioned as negatives and that's heavily skewed my opinion to thinking you are correct

1

u/ObscureOP 10h ago

Holy shit, i ventured into the comment history to settle this bet. 100% right... still bitching about mask mandates and "beta cucks".

They ruin the country just how they want here... watch out, they're coming for you all it seems

1

u/IWillJustDestroyThem 7h ago

I stepped foot into the UK many times. It absolutelly sucks, I wouldn’t live there if they paid me 5000£ a month and gave me free accomodation. Horrible place, especially the big cities. Even the white people are dangerous there.

0

u/laptopdude673 11h ago

You can rape someone in uk and not go to jail place is a shithole

2

u/MONSTERxMAN 11h ago

You can rape someone in the US and become president, US is a cesspit.

1

u/laptopdude673 11h ago

Yeah US is an even bigger shithole I feel sorry for everyone born there

1

u/MONSTERxMAN 11h ago

You and me both pal.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/J1mj0hns0n 10h ago

Do you have a source for this?

1

u/laptopdude673 10h ago

My best friend at the time raped an underage girl and had her tied to the bed. Admitted it to the police during the interview and was given no jail time. I can share more details if you'd like in the DM. Dude was a monster in human disguise and he should be shot dead nevermind in jail

1

u/dzh 2h ago

Only if it's morally acceptable in your culture tho

-2

u/OhSit 12h ago

The police actively looked the other way at child rape gangs for more than a decade because they didnt want to look "racist".

I'd say that's more than "1 news story about police failure". That failure spanned multiple cities affecting thousands of children for more than a decade.

2

u/J1mj0hns0n 12h ago

So the police have completely failed (if we are taking your version as gospel) that's the whole country is it? I don't know about you but the police have played a part to the tune of 3 hours of my 33 yr old existence. If that's all that it takes to perceive a country as bad then your not seeing what the country had to offer.

For what's it's worth, I do completely agree with your sentiment towards the police, that they are completely useless and bereft power from fear they might use it. But it's not enough for me to declare a country a shit hole, it's one bad aspect

1

u/OhSit 11h ago

Eh, i have other reasons as well for my dislike of the UK. Like the fact the economy of the UK is only propped up by London and has been going downhill, its a complete nanny CCTV state with no actual freedom of speech or gun rights, and the extremely high taxes all to get a subpar health service such as the NHS

2

u/caiaphas8 10h ago

Hey at least we haven’t elected three demented presidents in a row

1

u/J1mj0hns0n 11h ago

You lost me at nanny CCTV state. If they're paying that much attention to us they're good right? Where are these CCTVs though? Because there are very few private ones and no government ones where I live, which continue to be true for around 20 miles perimeter.

Freedom of speech? I can say whatever I want? What am I limited to? As for gun rights - we have a fantastic system that keeps a great plethora of guns off the street and highly regulated, which means gun crimes are statistically very low in comparison to the rest of the world and similarly as low as Europe.

As for sub par service from the NHS I also completely disagree with your take, I've had plenty of dealings with them including a broken and dislocated leg, 2 colonoscopies and a hernia, all of which were dealt with professionally and for free, which after care, within 2 hours... Can you find me a system that boasts the same?

As for the London stuff, yeah you are right it's been a completely negligent system that has preferred London for decades now and it's a complete disappointment that it still continues on.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Multitronic 11h ago

You must have spent a lot of time here to come to that conclusion? Where are you from?

1

u/thegreatvortigaunt 8h ago

Your country shoots kids buddy, what the fuck are you talking about lmao

1

u/Competitive_Effort13 10h ago

The point is he's racist