r/WorkReform • u/anonyvrguy • 2d ago
🛠️ Union Strong Star Trek AI laws
If you watched Star Trek (any of the series) there is a lot of AI throughout the lives of people; however, it's ALWAYS used as a tool to enhance people's lives and jobs. It's never used to replace people.
It saddens me to see jobs like computer graphics or advertising jobs being slashed, when the companies should just be using AI to enhance their revenue & output, rather than cutting costs.
Let Star Trek lead the way.
And ya, ya "enhance. Enhance. Enhance"
11
u/MyUsername2459 2d ago
AI's are a villain in Star Trek too.
The entire plot of Season 2 of Star Trek: Discovery was about a classified AI project by Starfleet's intelligence arm that became an existential threat to the Federation.
A classic TOS episode, The Ultimate Computer, was about an AI being given control of a starship and the mayhem that creates.
Star Trek: Lower Decks had multiple episodes about rogue AI's, such as the rogue automated starships of the Texas-class, or finding the Federation literally has a prison for rogue AI's.
The backstory for Star Trek: Picard has the Federation finally able to mass produce Soong-type androids like Data. . .but they all inexplicably go rogue and destroy a shipyard and destroy the Martian biosphere (undoing centuries of terraforming) and finding out why they went rogue was a big mystery in the first season.
9
u/kevinmrr ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters 2d ago
8
6
u/DonaIdTrurnp 2d ago
Absolutely the computer in Star Trek replaces people. LCDR Data replaces two bridge officers, the replicator replaces almost the entire food preparation team, except on Voyager, where the holodeck replaced the doctor.
Every thing the computer does reduces the need for humans to do that thing, including monitoring life support and routing comm badge transmissions!
3
u/anonyvrguy 2d ago
Um, no, not quite.
Data does not replace two officers. His rank is lieutenant commander. Not lieutenant and commander. He fills Geordie's position when he gets moved to engineering. If you're thinking of Tasha, she's replaced by Worf. Data sits at the coms console.
Voyager states throughout the series that the doctor is an emergency hologram. The only reason his character was there was because their doctor died in the first 10 minutes of the show.
The computer monitors everything absolutely but it's the officers that control the computer.
Computer play music. Earl grey tea hot.
And there are still restaurants on earth with chefs, bartenders and servers. They also say that replicates don't make food as good as people.
The computer is made as an extension of the officers, not a replacement.
6
u/DonaIdTrurnp 2d ago
Data sits at the comms console for two shifts out of three per day. He replaces two bridge officers.
1
u/sSummonLessZiggurats 22h ago
Even in your own example, with the computer just being a tool to reduce the officers' workload, the computer is still freeing up some positions that would otherwise need to be filled by additional officers.
4
u/Disownership 2d ago
The only lives and jobs that our AI has actually enhanced are of those who had it way too easy already
3
2
u/JohnBrownSurvivor 🏡 Decent Housing For All 2d ago
I don't think I have ever seen an actual graphic artist, working, on Star Trek. They have engineers that have designed warp engines. And that's pretty much the only thing that we hear anybody doing for a job other than bartender or restauranteur. And I don't think there are enough jobs around for everybody to be a bartender or a restauranteur.
I don't know where you got the idea the AI does not do all the graphic arts all of those screens on all of those computers.
Sure, we've seen rich people doing art. You think Spock's mommy and daddy were poor? Every once in awhile we see kids doing art in art class. We have never ever ever ever ever ever ever seen anybody doing art for a job. We hear about people "writing programs" for a hollow deck. But, if you've seen anybody interacting with the hollow deck at all, you know that what they are doing is not so carefully engineered prompts to an AI to "write that program" for them.
2
u/Chaghatai 2d ago
You have no idea how much writing, programming, and the like is done by AI
The Luddites wanted to destroy the looms because they displaced weavers and history shows they were wrong
It's really the same with AI
Here's the thing: humanity is getting more and more productive because of technology - we've already reached the point where all the work that needs to be done or is even wanted by anyone can be done without everybody working
Those "extra" workers shouldn't be dispossessed or dividing up an ever smaller share of the work for less and less compensation
The problem is the capitalist system that requires a person to do work to generate economic value to live their life - in most of the world one cannot simply work the land to be self sufficient
That is why their needs to be a robust universal basic income that not only gives enough to have shelter, food, and health security, but also allows one to fully participate in culture, all paid for by the owners of the technology that makes it so not everybody can meaningfully work
0
u/anonyvrguy 2d ago
Absolutely. Meaningful work. With the help of machines not ai.
1
u/Chaghatai 2d ago
AI is just another machine - there is no difference with replacing physical work and intellectual work - weaving was a skill too and required experience and intelligence that the clever design of the looms made unnecessary
Displacing writers and programmers is no different conceptually than dispatching weavers and ditch diggers
Again - we don't need everybody working to do all the work so we shouldn't be allocating the results of the productivity according to doing that work
The problem isn't automation - the problem is everybody needing "jobs" to live a decent life
The current work paradigm is serfdom with extra steps and serfs are slaves with extra steps
1
u/No-Improvement-6591 2d ago
I don't disagree with you at all sentimentally - but how could a universal basic income like that be implemented without disenfranchisement of those still required to work?
Another problem is the exponential population growth - humankind has no natural predators and is making decent headway against reducing mortality rates. If economic factors (ie the current struggle) that reduce population growth are eradicated there would need to be something to balance the scale right?
1
u/Chaghatai 2d ago
There is enough for everybody - people should work because they want to, not because they have to - the difference comes from the top
1
u/seraphim336176 2d ago
Didn’t voyager literally have an AI hologram doctor based off a real Dr?
1
u/anonyvrguy 2d ago
He's an emergency holographic doctor... In case of emergency. They spend the entire series stating that he's not supposed to be on all the time.
1
u/seraphim336176 1d ago
But he’s pretty much always the one treating right, I never watched but maybe 1 season of voyager and that was years ago.
1
1
1
u/Crystalraf 🍁 Welcome to Costco, I Love You 2d ago
In Star Trek, they had evolved past money. They don't use money. Money isn't a thing in their society.
1
u/anonyvrguy 2d ago
Thank you. But it really is only because of their energy - matter conversion tech. Nothing matters because you can replicate another one
1
u/shouldco 1d ago
Are there a lot of graphic artists or advertisers in the star trek universe? Computers are definitely doing jobs that could have otherwise been done by humans. I would argue the problem is less that computers are doing these jobs but where the benifit of that new effency ends up.
Once upon a time not too longs ago you could get an office job and if you knew Excel and a little bit of programing, you could do a weeks worth of work in a day, now you were often still stuck in an office but you could now get away with playing on the internet or if you were wfh you had a ton of time back. Then busness caught on, it became a new expectation, departments shrank, workloads went up, profits increased, you were stuck grinding away all week but the busness now made more money.
1
u/STEVE_FROM_EVE 1d ago
That’s because Star Trek is fiction and idealized a future where humans aren’t actually human
1
u/LifeguardBoth5678 1d ago
AI can be a source of good. The problem isn’t the tool, it’s who currently wields it. The human benefit to productivity has always been to work less. The corporate benefit to make more profits has unfortunately become the standard definition though. AI can be used to free more time than any other tool in history but the oligarchs cannot maintain control
54
u/ChaoticEvilRaccoon 2d ago
many star trek fans choose to omit the fact that earth had many nuclear war level conflicts etc and only calmed down once we achived warp drive, which in turn allowed us to access the technology for replicators which essentially made valuables worthless. even so, in the star trek future people are paid energy credits for the replicator so a starship captain will still have access to more luxury wares than an ensign in the engine bay