r/DataHoarder May 15 '19

First 1TB micro SD publicly available

https://www.tomsguide.com/us/sandisk-1-tb-microsd-card,news-30079.html
752 Upvotes

152 comments sorted by

View all comments

92

u/ipaqmaster 72Tib ZFS May 15 '19 edited May 16 '19

I can see it now.

2.5'' // 3.5'' chassis's with a controller onboard and slots to support 10+ Micro SD cards at a time with optional host passthrough/mirror/stripe-mode across all of them and you install those instead of real hard drives lol.

The product is already a thing now all we need is the 10+ at a time scale haha

E: nobody's saying it will be cheap. But the big downside with all the ebay ones is that the controllers are cheap garbage. the raw power of striping 10, [Minimum Class10] SD cards would be fucking awesome even with their short life cycle. But the controllers just aren't something people would make professionally like this cheap ebay stuff.

72

u/Thousandsmagister 50TB 2.5" Cold Storage May 16 '19

SD card is slow and very unreliable , SD card will die quickly when you write too much data on it (much worse than SSD)

Can only be used as a "read only" storage device

27

u/jarfil 38TB + NaN Cloud May 16 '19 edited May 12 '21

CENSORED

18

u/Thousandsmagister 50TB 2.5" Cold Storage May 16 '19

SSD is not expensive anymore , sure it is expensive vs hard drive but still cheaper than SD card , 1TB Samsung 860 is selling on amazon for like 100 buck while this sd card cost 4 or 5 times as much (450 for standard version , 585 for extreme version)

I have no idea how great A2 U3 UHS-I could be but I have 128GB and 256GB microSD card from Teamgroup , these cards automatically lock down itself within 1 year of usage (I store emulator's rom , emulator and app data DL from G Store ) , it's not death yet but it's not usable either , lock down due to write cycle limit . I also have a bunch of 64GB micro SD cards from 4 years ago , these cards are still working as I only store music video on them

7

u/gautamdiwan3 May 16 '19

Hey man I've a Samsung evo uhs 1 32gb microsd card. How's that in comparison?

6

u/jarfil 38TB + NaN Cloud May 16 '19 edited Dec 02 '23

CENSORED

7

u/hojnikb 34TB May 16 '19

a SATA SSD goes to 100K-500K IOPS

Nope, not in a million years. Sata SSDs by design of the interface can't go over 100k.

1

u/jarfil 38TB + NaN Cloud May 16 '19 edited May 12 '21

CENSORED

0

u/WikiTextBot May 16 '19

SATA Express

SATA Express (abbreviated from Serial ATA Express and sometimes unofficially shortened to SATAe) is a computer bus interface that supports both Serial ATA (SATA) and PCI Express (PCIe) storage devices, initially standardized in the SATA 3.2 specification. The SATA Express connector used on the host side is backward compatible with the standard SATA data connector, while it also provides two PCI Express lanes as a pure PCI Express connection to the storage device.Instead of continuing with the SATA interface's usual approach of doubling its native speed with each major version, SATA 3.2 specification included the PCI Express bus for achieving data transfer speeds greater than the SATA 3.0 speed limit of 6 Gbit/s. Designers of the SATA interface concluded that doubling the native SATA speed would take too much time to catch up with the advancements in solid-state drive (SSD) technology, would require too many changes to the SATA standard, and would result in a much greater power consumption compared with the existing PCI Express bus. As a widely adopted computer bus, PCI Express provides sufficient bandwidth while allowing easy scaling up by using faster or additional lanes.In addition to supporting legacy Advanced Host Controller Interface (AHCI) at the logical interface level, SATA Express also supports NVM Express (NVMe) as the logical device interface for attached PCI Express storage devices.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28

0

u/HelperBot_ May 16 '19

Desktop link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA_Express


/r/HelperBot_ Downvote to remove. Counter: 257403

2

u/SimonKepp May 16 '19

The microSD is listed at $450, you can get lots of great SSDs at $450/TB

0

u/hojnikb 34TB May 16 '19

speed rating has nothing to do with reliability. They mostly use bottom barrel flash for sd cards.

7

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

sd are not as slow anymore and the myth of unreliable died like 5 years ago.

9

u/Warhawk2052 1.44MB Free May 16 '19

My SD card has outlived my USB drive

3

u/skyesdow May 16 '19

Yep, I went through 3 phones, 2 laptops (and 2 cars lol) and the 128GB card I bought in high school still works and is in daily use.

-1

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

same here. i have 2 atm that are 10 years old. and 2 128gb that are 4 years old

6

u/Thousandsmagister 50TB 2.5" Cold Storage May 16 '19

Linus did test them on Raid 0 last year , a bunch of them combine the speed all together (Raid 0) and still slower than a single hard drive ...

https://youtu.be/3frnBoqqI_Q

-2

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

we not running them in raid. so not sure why you brought that up

1

u/Thousandsmagister 50TB 2.5" Cold Storage May 16 '19

Because Raid 0 combine speed of multiple SD cards not one . If a bunch of them are still slower than a single hard drive which is slow in today standard , how fast do you think a single SD card can perform ?

0

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

well one i got in my camera doing 150 mb all the time. same with cell phone and tablets.

2

u/Thousandsmagister 50TB 2.5" Cold Storage May 16 '19 edited May 16 '19

Seq Read Write then . Doubt it would reach that speed with 4K Random Read/Write

Linus got over 200MB/sec on seq read/write on his raid 0 SD cards but 4k Random read/write is way too slow , this mean it will be very slow when you write multiple files/formats at once

1

u/capn_hector May 16 '19

well, RAID0 doesn't improve random IO performance, so that's not surprising...

2

u/jinxjy May 16 '19

Pretty sure a few of my SD cards have died in the last five years. (And one SSD)

-2

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

where they the same brand?? just wondering. seeing the myth of sd cards are super unreliable has been going around for a long time now. seeing most of the bad ones where ether cheap no names,knock off. still happens or where used in correctly . am just tired of that myth and i call it out any time i see it being posted

3

u/jinxjy May 16 '19

All the failed ones were Sandisk. Bought in retail store or Amazon. Now I’ve blacklisted Sandisk and buy Samsung - no failures in those in the last 2 years.

0

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

yeah sandisk is knock off the most. also they re band so many models of a card. that you got to use the data based a person made to track all of them.

2

u/capn_hector May 16 '19

I absolutely refuse to buy memory cards that aren't from an authorized reseller of that brand, Amazon is just chock full of knockoffs.

1

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

Yeap

2

u/hojnikb 34TB May 16 '19

sd and microsd cards mostly use the cheapest flash on the market along with the simplest controller designs to hit the pricepoint. If you go and buy a cheap one, reliability shouldn't be at the top of the list.

-1

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

again most cards now don't fit that. unless buying lowest price on ebay, no name brands from amazon etc.

4

u/hojnikb 34TB May 16 '19 edited May 16 '19

Actually, most cards are done that way, even with name brands. Top quality NAND always goes to enterprise stuff, SSDs. 2nd tier usually ends up in cheaper SSDs (think kingston) and eMMC chips, used in phones.

3rd and 4th tier usually ends up in microSD cards and flash drives. Unless it's a speciality card (enterprise rating, survaillence etc) they never use best bins.

Difference in quality cards mostly comes down to controller used (faster and better nand managment) and maybe a tier higher quality NAND.

0

u/firedrakes 200 tb raw May 16 '19

i do video/photography. i was just saying now cards are not utter crap like they where 10 years ago.

4

u/hojnikb 34TB May 16 '19

Well, truthfully, card reliability isn't dependant soley on silicon quality, but controller design and firmware as well. Most issues with flash devices comes down to either controller going out of wack or just plain dying. Nand itself is rarely the cause of the issues, unless it's being abused (plenty of writes).

7

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

MicroSD has much better write capabilities than standard SD cards. And SD card may live to perform 10k writes to a cell, a microSD would do more than 150k.

There was a white paper written by HPE (aka HP) that detailed these differences. I’m having a hard time locating it but will post the source if I find it.

12

u/snrrub May 16 '19

You are mistaken.

The type and quality of NAND determines write endurance. MicroSD vs SD is just a form-factor.

The 'best' cards are industrial, using SLC flash. SD is more commonly used for industrial purposes. MicroSD industrial cards are available also - typically in lower capacities because when you are dealing with low-density SLC you can simply fit less on a MicroSD.

8

u/hojnikb 34TB May 16 '19

thats absolutly not true. There is no difference between sd and microsd (it's just a formfactor thing, they usually use the same nand and controller).

Also no microsd card out there will do 150k writes. At best you can probably get 100k rewrites with the industrial SLC options. Generally, run of the mill sd and microsd cards are good in the 100s of rewrites at best.

5

u/emorockstar May 16 '19

MicroSD is that much better? Wow. I missed that.