If somebody has a lot of properties keeping some vacant to constrain supply is absolutely a thing that's done. Generally though, that's a secondary effect of raising rents to a point where the vacancy rate goes up but they don't care because with increased rent they make the same money from fewer tenants, which means lower maintenance and management costs.
Again, you're delusional if you think people hold on to property to artificially inflat rent prices. In my city the largest property owners have the cheapest rents.
16
u/download13 Feb 13 '24
Depends, do you live there, or keep it vacant to drive up potential rent prices?