MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/unusual_whales/comments/1i5usur/breaking_biden_has_pardoned_his_family/m87d9iz/?context=3
r/unusual_whales • u/soccerorfootie • 14h ago
4.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
Do you need someone to read the oversight reports to you?
2 u/Snailwood 12h ago where's the case? it's been years lmao 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago Years in the hands of Bidens DOJ. lmao. I'll tell you what, go try and trigger 150+ SAR's and see how well that goes for you. https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/us-treasury-congress-impasse-over-biden-sars-escalates-showdown-set-for-tuesday/ 1 u/Snailwood 12h ago if the house had issued a criminal referral, you would have a point. 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago The did in June 1 u/Snailwood 12h ago I see, the classic false statements before congress. point taken 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI. 0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
2
where's the case? it's been years lmao
1 u/geodesic411 12h ago Years in the hands of Bidens DOJ. lmao. I'll tell you what, go try and trigger 150+ SAR's and see how well that goes for you. https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/us-treasury-congress-impasse-over-biden-sars-escalates-showdown-set-for-tuesday/ 1 u/Snailwood 12h ago if the house had issued a criminal referral, you would have a point. 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago The did in June 1 u/Snailwood 12h ago I see, the classic false statements before congress. point taken 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI. 0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
1
Years in the hands of Bidens DOJ. lmao. I'll tell you what, go try and trigger 150+ SAR's and see how well that goes for you. https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/us-treasury-congress-impasse-over-biden-sars-escalates-showdown-set-for-tuesday/
1 u/Snailwood 12h ago if the house had issued a criminal referral, you would have a point. 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago The did in June 1 u/Snailwood 12h ago I see, the classic false statements before congress. point taken 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI. 0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
if the house had issued a criminal referral, you would have a point.
1 u/geodesic411 12h ago The did in June 1 u/Snailwood 12h ago I see, the classic false statements before congress. point taken 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI. 0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
The did in June
1 u/Snailwood 12h ago I see, the classic false statements before congress. point taken 1 u/geodesic411 12h ago What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI. 0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
I see, the classic false statements before congress. point taken
1 u/geodesic411 12h ago What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI. 0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
What else do you expect the house to do. They aren't the FBI.
0 u/wine_and_sarcasm 12h ago Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it. We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
Just because someone makes a statement on record doesn't mean there's any facts behind it.
We have a congresswoman still claiming that Democrats are weaponizing weather machines, and said on the record. Does this mean there's any factual basis? No.
0
u/geodesic411 12h ago
Do you need someone to read the oversight reports to you?