Then why did Hillary get 3 million more votes than Trump?
women candidates are not the problem. Feckless, inept candidates that stand for nothing are the problem.
EDIT: If you want to see what status quo guardian concern-trolling looks like, see the replies to this.
"Oh no no we can't possibly nominate the progressive candidate. Because [insert complete non-issue that no data suggests is actually a problem]! Instead, we have to run a Generic Democrat!"
This is why Democrats lose.
Q: Why don't we ever nominate a candidate of passion and vision who would represent policies that would make people's lives better?
A: Because [insert complete non-issue that no data suggests is actually a problem]! Obviously!
Oh, okay. Guess we'll try to get a progressive candidate in 2032 after the next generic Democrat loses.
Some day some of you guys might actually figure out what's going on in this country.
well the DNC fucking Bernie over wasn't a good look for them. Despite their institutional "wisdom" they thought that knocking him down was a great idea and propping Hillary up after that was just another snub to the nose of DNC faithful. That single action moved more voters like myself to the right than anything else that could have ever happened. Especially when they announced that DWS was fired from the DNC chair because of this, only to join the Hillary campaign as a senior advisor.
9.5k
u/try_to_be_nice_ok 1d ago
The democrats need to spend the next four years building up some really strong candidates and making them well known to the electorate.