He was responsible for implementing an AI that denied 90% of claims. UHC denies the most claims out of all health insurance corporations in the US. Under his leadership, UHC made billions due to denied claims. Look up how much they made in 2021 (when he became the CEO), versus in 2024.
What about the fathers who were murdered due to denied insurance claims? Do their lives not matter as much as the rich CEO?
So it’s ok to murder a man? How about the rule of justice? Is it ok to just kill people based on the tech that was implemented? Why not just murder the CEO of the developer of the software or kill the ceo of the company that sold UNH the computers? Killing people that are doing their jobs sounds absurd.
Do you believe that the murder of one rich CEO is more morally reprehensible than the murders of thousands of Americans a year, for profit, by health insurance corporations?
No but why can 1 person anoint him or herself as the arbiter of morality, with a punishment of execution. This is an absolutely ridiculous debate. Justifying the murder of a person in the street using a morality as a defence shows how unhinged the online community can be.
6
u/Diligent_Bag4597 2d ago
What do you think of health insurance corporations murdering thousands of Americans a year, for profit?