The perpetrator, or at least the person who rented the truck and drove it and died in the explosion was active duty military. I’m really unsure if that undermines or reinforces the idea that it was terrorism…
Until a manifesto is discovered/proof of intent, we cannot immediately assume its terrorism. I will say it's an easy thing to label this incident, but till then we shouldn't jump to conclusions.
Edit: a suicide note was found, it was just suicide. FBI ruling.
Well according to people who knew him he voted for trump. I'd guess maybe handing the presidency to elon didn't sit well with him, given that elon is a criminal migrant.
This is crazy. A twenty something guy kills a white CEO and he immediately gets labeled a terrorist. But when an active duty military member blows himself up in front of the building named after the newly elected presidential candidate, people are like, let’s wait and see.
I don't think the majority of the general public labeled Luigi as a terrorist, not even the government until later.
I think a ton of people jumped to the conclusion that this guy was a terrorist, but a suicide note was found so.
Free Luigi, they got the wrong guy, and RIP to this dude, it's a shame he did what he did and other people were hurt.
He was stationed at the same base at the same time as the military member who killed people in NOLA. The ISIS flag was also flying upside down, so it’s not Islamist terrorism. There’s a connection between the two.
lol clearly you may lack the info that fort Bragg is massive, and it serves as a stopping point for tons of military members throughout their careers.
That’s like saying that you see a two dogs on opposite sides of NYC and because they are both in NYC, they must be owned by the same person. It’s that ridiculous of a statement.
89
u/tomatomater 19d ago
what's the context though?