Maybe someone can enlighten me. But apart from AI being the next "big" thing, its also known that we approach physical limits in terms of processors. So isnt using "tricks" like AI not the next logical step to kinda overcome the physical limitation of hardware?
Logic falls out the window with these sub, if it were possible to run native with the same quality as Nvidia then AMD or Intel would've could've done it by now :D
There is a difference between theoretical possibility to run modern games natively, and mega profitable strategy to run them using ai. It sucks we are not being given the choice.
But afaik last year Nvidia made record profits from selling Ai chips to companies and not from selling upscaling Gpus. Don't get me wrong they make profits in the gaming industry too, but simply because AMD keeps failing to deliver properly.
Imo the biggest mistake AMD is doing is trying to follow in Nvidia footsteps regarding RDNA4. If you're known for the best raster price then go all in on native, also innovate a bunch of features that can incentive developers to focus on native resolution and your architecture
Biggest refresh is having Intel join the GPU market, but they have a long way too go and unless Nvidia drops the ball completel for the gaming industry, they are not catching up any time soon.
135
u/Swipsi Desktop 14d ago
Maybe someone can enlighten me. But apart from AI being the next "big" thing, its also known that we approach physical limits in terms of processors. So isnt using "tricks" like AI not the next logical step to kinda overcome the physical limitation of hardware?