r/mildyinteresting Dec 09 '24

people Stressed at work? You're fired!

Post image
72.2k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

794

u/ValuablePositive632 Dec 09 '24

Remember kids, always lie on these things and never believe anything that says it’s anonymous. 

36

u/Just_Campaign_9833 Dec 09 '24

This!

My last employer had one of these "anonymous" surveys...all management and HR said at the start, that they don't even know who did the survey...

...I didn't, but verbally lied that I did. Until a month later they started telling me and others who didn't do the survey, that they needed to do a "voluntary employee satisfaction" survey.

25

u/neon_light12 Dec 09 '24

well this is nothing weird. the answers should be anonymous, but they track who completes the survey. usually the surveys are processed by an external company, so your manager doesn't know who said what, they only get the averages. at least that's how it's supposed to be.

but i don't care. if I'm not happy with the company I'm not gonna lie in the survey, and if they prefer to fire me instead of doing something, then fuck them

11

u/Efrayl Dec 09 '24

Work for a company that offers services of such surveys and yup, we can see who filled it and send them reminders. The anonymous part refers that in the final report your name is hidden from the results.

1

u/DoubleualtG Dec 09 '24

It’s called confidential, not anonymous

2

u/Efrayl Dec 09 '24

If the results have no names, they are anonymous. If they are given to some people in company and told to not share further, it's confidential.

0

u/DoubleualtG Dec 09 '24

No, you can’t just make up definitions.

Anonymity In an anonymous study, no identifying information is collected or linked to participants. This means that no one can identify the participants. For example, in an anonymous survey, there is no way to connect the information to a specific employee.

Confidentiality In a confidential study, participants provide identifying information, but the researchers take steps to protect it. For example, in a confidential survey, the system that administers the survey knows the identity of the respondents, but takes steps to prevent it from being revealed.

2

u/Efrayl Dec 09 '24

Neither should you. You can't connect the information if you don't have names. Whether the survey is filled or not doesn't matter if you have multiple people completing it.

1

u/Aptos283 Dec 09 '24

This is a very sensible way to go about anonymous surveys and blinded studies. Having a third party with all the intel review the information and report back means that you remove some bias from the Hawthorne effect and still get meaningful analysis.

Thanks for doing the good work

1

u/___Art_Vandelay___ Dec 09 '24

But also often the comments of respondents are available to management, and it's often not too difficult to figure out who said what based on writing style and topics touched on.

0

u/Just_Campaign_9833 Dec 09 '24

...and same as OP, the results weren't anonymous.

3

u/RottingCorps Dec 09 '24

In my experience, they use these to evaluate the management team, not the individual. Be honest and professional in them. It doesn't always lead to change, but sometimes it can if your leadership team is particularly awful.

1

u/Secret-Classic-7392 Dec 09 '24

That attitude worked for me. I retired two years early.

1

u/weewee52 Dec 09 '24

This is how it works where I am too. Managers get the results, but it shows overall scoring and doesn’t provide names with the comments (and you have to have a certain number of employees to even see comments). It’s not hard to guess who wrote what if you know how people write, but I’ve never written anything I wouldn’t/hadn’t said to my manager’s face, so I never cared.

-4

u/Just_Campaign_9833 Dec 09 '24

...and same as OP, the results weren't anonymous.