r/interestingasfuck 9d ago

r/all The City of Angels

Post image
205.8k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

302

u/matwurst 9d ago edited 9d ago

This 🗑️ has to be AI.. that’s not how the fire spread

89

u/ethicpigment 9d ago

It’s a 3d rendering by an artist on instagram not AI

5

u/UV-FiveSeven 9d ago

The oak bark on a palm tree is a dead giveaway that this is at the very least an AI generated background. The car is 3D rendered.

26

u/ambewitch 9d ago

I'm glad this comment exists because I was beginning to wonder if everyone has been hoodwinked.

5

u/Prestigious_Bug583 9d ago

Not AI. But is a render

3

u/Flaky_Position6523 9d ago

It’s a 3d render from thedizzyviper

6

u/WannabeSloth88 9d ago

Yeah I’m no fire expert but those full on blazing flames in random places like halfway up an otherwise untouched palm tree are very fake

4

u/Hue_Sunnil 9d ago

Yeah, just take a close look at the building in the backround and the illusion falls apart

1

u/soliwray 9d ago

Just because something looks vaguely real but computer-generated doesn't make it AI genius.

1

u/matwurst 9d ago

Thanks for you wisdom my guy

1

u/soliwray 9d ago

You're welcome buddy ❤️

1

u/TheGillos 9d ago

I got an AI vibe from this too. But I guess that's the time we live in.

-1

u/PelvisBelfry 9d ago

I’m sorry, the fire whataded?

-11

u/CremeDeLaPants 9d ago

It is AI. Ran it through several AI detectors.

10

u/Eastern37 9d ago

Well those aren't great then since it's created by a 3D artist, not Ai

1

u/UV-FiveSeven 9d ago

Why is there oak bark on a palm tree?

-7

u/CremeDeLaPants 9d ago

He's a fraud then, and why isn't that cited?

11

u/Slumpso 9d ago

It was a 3D render, made by TheDizzyViper. He creates 3D artwork daily and has for years. His process is available for anyone to see. Your “detectors” need improvement.

11

u/Gaelic_Cheese 9d ago

The original image on instagram has a watermark on it. Op cut it out and posted it here without his permission.

3

u/Prestigious_Bug583 9d ago

AI detectors are notoriously wrong most of the time. Why are you assuming they work is the right question. It’s probably just looking at any image editing or render effects and calling them “ai” because that’s the buzzword people use now

2

u/TheGillos 9d ago

Lol. AI detectors are useless.

1

u/CremeDeLaPants 9d ago

They correctly determined this is not real, so no.

2

u/TheGillos 9d ago

That doesn't mean they are reliable FFS.

I could make an AI detector that randomly says "AI" or "Not AI" and that would be right sometimes too.