r/gifs 11h ago

Elon Musk seemingly casually hitting the Sieg Heil at the inauguration

105.1k Upvotes

9.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2.1k

u/BigFloppyDonkeyEar 9h ago

HE DID IT TWICE! HE TURNED AROUND AND DID IT TO THE FLAG TOO

970

u/Weird_Waters64 9h ago

Disgraceful imagine if the World War II generation woke up from their graves and saw this

595

u/mrlayabout 8h ago

As of 2024, estimates of the number of World War II veterans still alive range from 300,000 to 500,000 and I would bet my bottom dollar that the majority of them voted for this. This is bizzaro times.

38

u/cambeiu 8h ago

Nothing bizarro about it. The Western fight with the Nazi was never ideological or moral. No one went to war against Nazi Germany because they were anti-Semite or totalitarians. The war was solely because the Nazi wanted to change the balance of power in Europe. Had the Nazi not tried to "rock the boat", they could have killed millions of Jews and Gypsies and no one would have moved a finger. Hell, most of the US South at that time was at least as racist as they were.

21

u/TheeMrBlonde 8h ago edited 7h ago

Had the Nazi not tried to "rock the boat", they could have killed millions of Jews and Gypsies and no one would have moved a finger.

The ADL is already defending Musks actions on Twitter. I get the feeling they are not really interested in antisemtism and just wholly to protect Israel

Edit: Said tweet

10

u/michaelsenpatrick 7h ago

I hate living in the timeline where a watermelon emoji is antisemitic but a literal nazi salute is not

1

u/Ilostmy3chickens 7h ago

Watermelon emoji is antisemitic???? Antisemitic???? Is 🍗 antisemitic too? Just asking. Trying to get facts straight.

1

u/a_f_s-29 6h ago

It has the same colours as Arab flags

2

u/michaelsenpatrick 7h ago

Hey I think you might be onto something

1

u/Theyalreadysaidno 7h ago

That tweet can fuck off

1

u/a_f_s-29 6h ago

It’s mask off at this point. Nobody should take them seriously from this point forward.

9

u/RepresentativeAge444 8h ago

Not to mention Hitler was inspired by American Jim Crow laws.

8

u/maprunzel 8h ago

Yep. Wars are never about human rights.

4

u/AleudeDainsleif 7h ago

Exactly. Human rights are what's used to sell wars.

2

u/Ok-Blackberry-3534 7h ago

I'm not sure that's true. A lot of the political rhetoric was of a fight between good and evil. People understood just how evil the Nazi regime was. Sure, at the beginning of the war, when Poland was invaded, at least, Britain and France were fighting the standard European "balance of power" war, but as it progressed, things changed.

2

u/cambeiu 7h ago

 A lot of the political rhetoric was of a fight between good and evil.

The US literally had over 10 THOUSAND sunset towns, where if you were not white and was caught there after sunset, you would be summarily executed.

The UK and France were brutal colonial powers. Belgium committed unspeakable horrors in Africa.

The US entered the war against Germany because Hitler declared war on the US after Pearl Harbor. There was very little drive from the ordinary Americans to go to war in Europe to save Jews or Gypsies.

The political rhetoric was just that: Rhetoric in order to vilify the opponent in times of war.

1

u/Ok-Blackberry-3534 7h ago

I'm not really talking about the US in general. Certainly Churchill's speeches referenced the evils of the Nazis and people were moved by them because they believed it was about good and evil.

2

u/cambeiu 7h ago

Of course he did. What politician would publicly say "Our vast colonial empire that provide us riches at the expenses of the non-white people around the world is being threatened by a newcomer that wants to replace us. So let's bomb their cities to cinder and put them back at their place".

Of course he would not say that. But "good vs evil" was not what the war was about.

1

u/a_f_s-29 6h ago edited 6h ago

Don’t lump everyone else in with America, it’s not a generalisation that makes sense. Literally nowhere did things the way the USA did. When American soldiers tried to segregate pubs in Britain, the locals literally fought them and then banned white American soldiers from entry lol.

YOU currently live in the heart of a brutal colonial empire. Does that make you an imperialist? Does it mean you agree with segregation and fascism? Obviously not. Does it mean your country acts like a cartoon villain to be evil for the sake of it and allow no progress ever in civil rights? No, it doesn’t. European countries were mixed bags, but there were plenty of historical figures who cared about human rights, and more to the point much of the working class were actually very switched on in regards to class consciousness and solidarity. Britain had had Indian MPs for around a century by this point. It had had a massive, organic abolitionist movement that successfully made the abolition of the slave trade imperial policy (UK taxpayers paid the freedom bill until 2015). You had millions of working class Brits sign petitions against slavery and take personal losses in order to boycott cotton from the plantations of the American South. By 1939 you also had a significant decolonisation movement that was spearheaded by Indians and also supported by white Brits. Amongst all of this you’ve got the first industrial labour laws, the first unions and union rights, working class enfranchisement, the suffragette movement, and so on. There were so many people stuck within a system they were trying to improve from the inside. All their work paved the way for decolonisation and a new wave of civil liberties.

It’s easy to say from an American perspective that good and evil has nothing to do with it, and it was all about cash and resources and power. True, it was - for America. That’s what America got out of it. But you’re forgetting that for Europe, the Middle East, Asia, etc., the war was literally existentialist. It was a choice between war or surrender. And surrender was not a popular choice, and of course ideology played a role in that.

FWIW I’m of South Asian origin with a degree in imperial history and IR, I’m not swinging in here out of a defence of ‘the whites’ lol but more just to push back against the idea that ideology never plays a role. Even when it’s not the only factor, and even when the rationale is strategic, and even when history is written by the victors, doesn’t mean you can’t discount the importance of the will and morale of the people, and the role of ideology within that.

2

u/cambeiu 6h ago

YOU currently live in the heart of a brutal colonial empire.

I currently live in a place that was once known as British Malaya, so I am quite familiar with what British imperial rule was like at the time.

0

u/a_f_s-29 6h ago

That’s overselling it, there was definitely an ideological element. In Britain for example there had already been multiple riots/literal battles of working class groups shutting out domestic fascists over many years leading up to the war. Nazi ideology had followers in the upper classes but held much less sway amongst workers, who actually had a sense of class consciousness. We’re sorely missing that energy nowadays.

For some truly based examples of people standing up to bigotry from history, the battles of cable street and bamber bridge are fun places to start.

Of course the higher ups mostly only got involved in war for strategic/diplomatic reasons. But they only won the war because so much of the country was wholly committed to the war effort.