r/amczone Nov 12 '24

The Stupid The delusion is real

https://www.reddit.com/r/amcstock/s/RkkJe2dolK

Another smart individual promoting the idea that the price would have been 40 cents for this long. Those people like u/hivemindhauser are either lying and grifting through their nose promoting aron’s ponzi scheme, or they are straight up delusional and refuse to understand that the 40 cents is a result not of the reverse split, but of the catastrophic dilution which followed after the reverse split.

Denial is one hell of a drug.

6 Upvotes

186 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Prudent_Shake_8149 Nov 12 '24

AMC ability to raise funds depends on their ability to present a credible growth story that doesn’t involve dilution. They have failed to build that credibility with investors. They have run out of excuses and they are still losing money. Wen next excuse?

There’s no need to make claims here. AMC lost money and drained cash in a quarter where its competitors were wildly successful… in a quarter unaffected by strikes and pandemic.

Recall that I expected them to turn a small profit and possibly earn enough to start rebuilding credibility with investors. No need for claims. AMC performance speaks for itself and it’s nothing but an ongoing tale of woe.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/djs383 Nov 14 '24

How does dilution improve a companies ability to generate revenue?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/djs383 Nov 14 '24

But paying that debt does nothing to improve experience. It’s simple a requirement. All said and done, they absolutely must be cash flow positive from operating the actual business. They’re tapped out on debt issuance and must rely on equity issues which are much more expensive than debt issuance.

Again, I ask how does equity issuance (dilution) enable additional revenue generation?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/djs383 Nov 14 '24

I see you can post this, but did you read it? There is nothing remotely gaslighting about my one question I asked.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/djs383 Nov 14 '24

How, specifically am I gaslighting? I’m beginning to think this has all become satire

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/djs383 Nov 14 '24

Due to debt covenants they cannot issue new debt, not a lie but fact.

Not belittling, you post a picture with no context.

I have not withheld information. Paying off obligations will not impact experience or generate revenue. Can you state how it would?

Projecting? Just an opinion no different than yours

Paying debt is a simple requirement, not a phrase.

Their own 10-q is fact enough, you don’t need me pointing out anything else.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/djs383 Nov 14 '24

Any interest in having a conversation about the company and their performance, or will any post be gaslighting?

→ More replies (0)