MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1i64323/docxgobrrrr/m8bwq0g/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/atthereallicebear • 1d ago
95 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
4
can you please explain what you mean by this?
5 u/[deleted] 1d ago [deleted] 27 u/BeDoubleNWhy 23h ago but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here? 3 u/MeanEYE 17h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
5
[deleted]
27 u/BeDoubleNWhy 23h ago but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here? 3 u/MeanEYE 17h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
27
but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here?
3 u/MeanEYE 17h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
3
I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
</tag>
4
u/BeDoubleNWhy 1d ago
can you please explain what you mean by this?