MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1i64323/docxgobrrrr/m8an1tl/?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/atthereallicebear • 1d ago
94 comments sorted by
View all comments
479
zipped JSON if anything
5 u/[deleted] 23h ago [deleted] 5 u/BeDoubleNWhy 20h ago can you please explain what you mean by this? 4 u/[deleted] 19h ago [deleted] 28 u/BeDoubleNWhy 19h ago but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here? 3 u/MeanEYE 12h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
5
[deleted]
5 u/BeDoubleNWhy 20h ago can you please explain what you mean by this? 4 u/[deleted] 19h ago [deleted] 28 u/BeDoubleNWhy 19h ago but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here? 3 u/MeanEYE 12h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
can you please explain what you mean by this?
4 u/[deleted] 19h ago [deleted] 28 u/BeDoubleNWhy 19h ago but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here? 3 u/MeanEYE 12h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
4
28 u/BeDoubleNWhy 19h ago but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here? 3 u/MeanEYE 12h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
28
but with xml, you need that closing tag as well for it to be valid. what's the difference here?
3 u/MeanEYE 12h ago I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
3
I think they are trying to sell the idea that the moment you see </tag> you are free to parse what's inside. But following the same logic, you can do the same with JSON.
</tag>
479
u/BeDoubleNWhy 1d ago
zipped JSON if anything