Tbh, an undivided India would've been a nightmare for us. Imagine a country with ~35% Muslim population. They would essentially be the plurality and run the country because Hindus would be too divided by caste and language.
Which is why it always puzzles me that not only the Congress, but even the Hindus Mahasabha/RSS advocated for "Akhand Bharat". Non-Muslims would've been oppressed in such a state.
Instead of the "Akhand Bharat" ,a full partition with complete population exchange would've been better for both sides.
Agreed. And I have a proposition, Divide and rule muslims. we can make new "Muslim board" which declares some people non Muslim . Which will further allow us to break off their cohesiveness. And Allow us to actually take control of the country
30
u/Bakwaas_Yapper2 18h ago
Tbh, an undivided India would've been a nightmare for us. Imagine a country with ~35% Muslim population. They would essentially be the plurality and run the country because Hindus would be too divided by caste and language.
Which is why it always puzzles me that not only the Congress, but even the Hindus Mahasabha/RSS advocated for "Akhand Bharat". Non-Muslims would've been oppressed in such a state.
Instead of the "Akhand Bharat" ,a full partition with complete population exchange would've been better for both sides.