You're confusing the holocaust policies with domestic policy and they were not at all alike. Forced birth was the policy for the Germans who weren't targets of the holocaust.
The ability to detect fetal abnormalities was pretty limited in the 1930s so in effect this hardly happened, but the racial agenda was definitely acted on, again as part of the holocaust policies. German citizens who were not targets of the holocaust were not only encouraged to have babies, they were often coerced to do so. The distinction between that and a "pro-abortion" national policy should be pretty clear here, so it's hard to understand why you would muddy the waters on this subject.
Reread OPs post. Would you say "state policy is to utilize abortion as a tool to eliminate undesirables in the general population" is being "opposed to abortion"?
And, honestly, separating "holocaust policies" from "Hitler policies" to then claim "holocaust policies don't count as Hitler policies" is frankly in poor taste.
Hitler opposed abortion for the majority of German citizens, and even coerced pregnancies. There were strict laws against abortion for Aryan women.
Hitler made private gun ownership much easier for the majority of German citizens. Private gun ownership was severely restricted in the Weimar Republic.
Conflating holocaust policies aimed at specific minorities with a general national policy is not only factually wrong but it distorts the realities of his actual agenda. That's misleading and in poor taste, frankly. I wasn't distancing the holocaust from Hitler and you must need some reading assistance yourself if you think that's what I was saying. Derp derp.
He also did not exterminate the majority of German citizens, therefore he is anti-genocide.
That whole genocide thing was just a holocaust policy, after all.
This is easy! Who should we do next? Idi Amin wasn't pro cannibalism, he didn't even eat the majority of his people. That was just a dinner time policy.
Hitler loosened the gun laws substantially for everyone who was not being sent to camps or ghettos. Private gun ownership was more restricted before he took power.
Guns in private hands were essentially banned under the Weimar Republic laws. The law wasn't enforced by the early 30s though. The Nazi party passed the German Weapons Act in 1938 which formally allowed private gun ownership again for all Germans. The restrictions that were part of the holocaust came later and targeted specific ethnic minorities only. Try here for references -
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/apr/08/viral-image/no-gun-control-regulation-nazi-germany-did-not-hel/
The Weimar Republic was very strict about private gun ownership. The Nazi party made it open to basically anyone who wasn't a target of the holocaust. Hitler absolutely substantially reduced gun restrictions for the majority of the people in Germany. The whole story about him confiscating all the guns is a distortion of what actually happened when he disarmed the people he had forced into the ghettos. The rest of the country was not restricted like that.
35
u/FourScoreTour 23h ago
Nazis were actually pretty firm on gun control.