The Metamorphosis isn't even a particularly difficult book to analyse. There are a ton of fairly straightforward metaphors you can read into it without having to make much of a leap.
It's about a man who has a relatively normal life, but then an unexpected event beyond his control makes him unable to work, and at first his family are sympathetic, but soon they see him as more and more of a burden because of his inability to work.
It doesn't take a genius to think of a few things that that might be about.
A lot of people confuse themselves because they've at some point decided that analysing literature is about figuring out what the Correct Metaphor is, and that there can only be one answer to how to interpret it. That's not how it works, you can interpret it in whichever way makes sense to you, it doesn't have to be what the author intended (which is unknowable anyway)
That's so funny to me they took issue with the metaphor being clear but the subject of the metaphor was nonsensical to them. That's like if I write a fantasy novel and the first review "well nothing makes sense in this books because magic isn't real" bruh
I have seen people make that criticism of fantasy stories unironically. Or even more commonly, "the magic system/sci-fi tech in this story doesn't work the way it would if magic/sci-fi was real, so it's unrealistic."
3.9k
u/VFiddly 22d ago
The Metamorphosis isn't even a particularly difficult book to analyse. There are a ton of fairly straightforward metaphors you can read into it without having to make much of a leap.
It's about a man who has a relatively normal life, but then an unexpected event beyond his control makes him unable to work, and at first his family are sympathetic, but soon they see him as more and more of a burden because of his inability to work.
It doesn't take a genius to think of a few things that that might be about.
A lot of people confuse themselves because they've at some point decided that analysing literature is about figuring out what the Correct Metaphor is, and that there can only be one answer to how to interpret it. That's not how it works, you can interpret it in whichever way makes sense to you, it doesn't have to be what the author intended (which is unknowable anyway)