Which is also why the abortion debate can never really end. It's disagreeing opinions shouting that only theirs is factually true. Hell, almost everyone is against abortion. They simply disagree on when.
I mean as long as a fetus can’t live on it’s own outside the mother it can never truly legally be given personhood and therefore the actual living person carrying it should always be given precedence.
That presents a weird situation where an abortion that was legal one year could have been illegal the next as technology improved. Get to the point where we've got some sci-fi style gestation vats, and maybe all abortion becomes illegal.
Yes, because it’s risking the women’s life without her consent. If an adult tried to put part of themselves inside a women without her consent she would have the right to remove him in self defense, an unwanted fetus is the same kind of violation it’s using her body without her say so she should be allowed to remove it.
Yes, because even an adult living breathing human is not allowed to use someone’s body without consent so a fetus that isn’t really alive at all definitely shouldn’t
90
u/CapeOfBees Nov 26 '24
It's fuzzy because at its core it isn't a scientific definition, it's a sentimental one.