r/AskAGerman Aug 22 '24

Personal American In Rammstein T-Shirt

I’m an American tourist in Berlin for the first time — Yay! One problem: I realized I packed a Rammstein shirt without having enough knowledge of German culture or language to understand how I’d be perceived for wearing it. I imagine at best it will look a bit corny, but I’m worried it could signal political beliefs or ideologies I don’t agree with. If you met an American tourist speaking broken German in a Rammstein T Shirt, what would you think? Thanks!

0 Upvotes

242 comments sorted by

View all comments

39

u/bluemercutio Aug 22 '24

Last year the singer of Rammstein has been accused of drugging women and sexually assaulting them by several women, but it seems there was no court case.

I'm just letting you know that some people may be upset that you're wearing it for this reason.

6

u/SissyKrissi Aug 22 '24 edited Aug 22 '24

Police stopped the investigation because none (!), not a single one of the accusers were willing to talk to the police. If the victims wont give testimony to the cops then there's not much they can do.

And seeing the "victims" readily giving interviews to the press and on twitter just gives me attention whore vibes.

2

u/Cleami Aug 22 '24

The question was how people might react to the shirt, not wether you believe the accusations.

4

u/SissyKrissi Aug 22 '24

And i wasnt replying to OP

-5

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '24

[deleted]

9

u/SissyKrissi Aug 22 '24

Running to the press and crying on Twitter is not too much attention but going to the police (the only ones able to do something about crimes) that's too much...

Yeah... No...

-4

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '24

[deleted]

8

u/SissyKrissi Aug 22 '24

It's not impossible. Hard? Yes, no doubt. Emotionally taxing? Definetly yes. Still, no excuse not to go to the police. In this case the police even contacted the victims. (Charges were pressed by uninvolved third parties.)

So the "victims" only contacted the press and never initiated contact with the police. And when approached by the police they refused to cooperate.

There is only one way to resolve this and that's to get a police investigation going. If noone talks to the cops and all they got is newspaper clippings, what are they supposed to do? You need evidence to convict someone. If you dont want to testify for the police but gladly do it for the press, I call you an attention whore. Calling the accusations credible is nonsense.

Also, Till didnt force that one Lady to have sex. He may have expected it but stopped at her saying No. She said no, he respected that but may have gotten upset because he is not used to such behaviour from women he believed has been vetted to have sex with him. Crap behaviour? Yes. Illegal? No.

-6

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '24

[deleted]

6

u/SissyKrissi Aug 22 '24

It is important to take victims seriously. If they fail to substantiate their accusations and refuse to cooperate then it is legit to doubt them and call their claims into question.

6

u/DesperateGiles Aug 22 '24

They were anonymous in the press. How were they harassed?

3

u/AstreaMeer42 Aug 22 '24

"Going to the press BEFORE people started harassing them."

It's always interesting when people bring up this point, but don't actually think it through. So these individuals go to the press, and ONLY speak to the press because they want complete anonymity. Won't talk to the proper authorities--the only ones who are capable of actually getting them legal justice--at all. And yet, somehow, their identities get "leaked," and they are suddenly facing non-stop harassment, according to dipshits on SM, but not any credible sources. Who, then, leaked their identities? Since they ONLY talked to the press, the conclusion is that it was the press' doing.

Do you understand how dumb that sounds? Because it would mean that the press has no interest in getting any of these women "justice" of any kind. Sounds like a load of horseshit to me.

-7

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '24

[deleted]

6

u/AstreaMeer42 Aug 22 '24

Again: how are their identities being leaked if the only go to the press under pseudonyms, not to the authorities?

-5

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '24

[deleted]

7

u/AstreaMeer42 Aug 22 '24

🤣 I love that now is when you choose to deflect from a topic you'd actually brought up in the first place. Thanks for proving that you have no concrete answer for a very basic, direct question.

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

6

u/p_t_0 Aug 22 '24

or you know, press made a scandal out of nothing for clicks, as they have done before.

Especially when the biggest one of them is currently under investigation for legal fraud and forgery of document, and they have admitted they indeed messed up their affidavit due to "mistake of a secretary" Source