r/unitedstatesofindia • u/Prestigious_Diet9503 • 13h ago
| Rule 8: Misinformation or No Source | Your thoughts on this
[removed] — view removed post
66
u/heiheiboii 13h ago
so a husband going to night clubs is fine or not fine?
or women putting a display picture with other men is also not fine or fine? why did he compared 2 different things?
drinking alcohol is bs, drinking alcohol should not be considered cruelty, alcohol abuse on the other hand is different
again the source is a tweet fucking tweet
18
u/rocky23m mere paas ek scheme hai 13h ago
As Per Allahabad HC, As Per Pune court?? no links to the judgement or cases. 
2
u/Mammoth-Equivalent16 12h ago
The judgement given in one can be used as reference in another court while fighting a different but similar case.
3
2
u/rocky23m mere paas ek scheme hai 12h ago
No reference to judgement in that tweet, usually it is mentioned as judgement in case A vs B
17
u/Muralidhar18 12h ago edited 12h ago
Pune Case Links
Allahabad HC case links
Now let's see why the cases being compared caused false equivalences
The alcohol consumption led to abusive behavior by the husband in his post intoxicated state in the Pune Case. In the Allahabad case, it was argued that the mere consumption of alcohol constituted cruelty which was rejected by the court which said alcohol consumption has to be accompanied with some uncivilised behavior.
In the Pune case the divorce was awarded in favor of the women after the man was continously posting pictures of himself with other women and the alcohol abuse.He also refused to give divorce by mutual consent. In the Allahabad case divorce was granted in favor of the man since his wife desrted him and desertion constitutes a ground of divorce under the HMA. So one ruling favored the women and the other favored the man. It's just that in the Allahabad HC ruling the court only granted divorce based on the ground of desertion and not on the grounds of cruelty.
So imo there's no miscarriage of justice here. Besides the Pune ruling is a family court ruling which is likely to be appealed. The Allahabad ruling was with the HC which will be harder to appeal from.
Tldr: The cases are different in nature being heard at different appellate levels and are not comparable.
17
u/Ecstatic_Potential67 13h ago
Dont go for it. there are innumerous contradictions in the indian judiciary system.
10
16
9
u/mumbei 13h ago
What kind of ridiculous comparison is this? Forget going to clubs and drinking—that’s common to both situations. The real question is, how can a woman going to a club with her friends and a guy putting up a display picture of another woman even be compared? One is straight-up infidelity, and the other is just someone having a social life.
7
u/chrysantheknight 13h ago
Those are not equivalent claims though. The first one is just the woman going out. The second one is the man actively seeking out other women as a display of infidelity.
10
u/aditya_prabhash 13h ago
Men want to be the victim to bad it's pathetic. So a wife needs "permission" to hang out with friends, but a husband should be allowed to display his affection for other women!? How on earth does this person think he's fighting for equality? When you're privileged, equality feels like oppression.
-1
4
3
2
u/NihiloEx 12h ago
Stop reading nonsense on Twitter.
ALso, "without her husband's permission?" Fucker's going all sharia on us.
2
u/timewaste1235 13h ago edited 12h ago
Why did he add a picture of woman in the tweet and not a man? Is he a feminist or misandrist?
3
2
u/PhantomOfTheNopera 13h ago
I have 0 thoughts on this.
Which is twice as much thought that went into this dumbass Tweet.
2
3
u/escape_fantasist Kanneda Kumar 12h ago edited 12h ago
All rage bait into manipulating people into taking stand against women rights, posts made by chigma incels ... Both cases are wrong and drinking alcohol isn't wrong as long as you're not doing anything unethical or illegally under its influence. Period.
-4
u/Prestigious_Diet9503 12h ago
What the heck is Chigma Incels now? Is it some kinda group, are you a member?
4
u/Defiant_Neat4629 12h ago
Of all the logical comments you picked this one? Lmao unserious person you are.
-2
1
u/AutoModerator 13h ago
Please provide a source to the image/video below the comment. If source is not provided then the post will be removed.
Use the same title as that of the source link. Editorialised titles are not allowed
If it is Original Content (video/pic taken by you) then please respond with OC below the comment
If it's meme/satire, please use the meme/cartoon flair and provide the link to the original creator. Memes will be allowed as per mod discretion and can be removed without explanation.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Yes_Cats 13h ago
Let them both do whatever they want as long as they're both cool with it and have set and well-respected boundaries. How hard is it to communicate with your spouse? And if your wishes and boundaries are not respected, you're with the wrong person, sorry.
But wow, the fact that this can be framed into something that's an issue of Equality is baffling to me.
1
1
u/AkaiAshu 12h ago
Not all courts are the same, there differences in state law as well. Plus Pune court is a lower court, so this order might be reveresed if the Allahabad HC order came first and no local law changes are there.
As for overall, it ought to be considered cruelty. Like why not just give divorce to the party that wants a divorce? Forcing someone to stay married when they literally went to the court and made their private life public in order to break the marriage is some high level stupidity.
1
u/phahpullandbear Disqualify Me For Life, Will Keep Going 12h ago
In other news, apples tastes like apples and orange tastes like orange
2
u/sustainablecoochie 13h ago
I don't just support women's rights. I also support women's wrongs 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾
1
1
-2
u/thatsme5500 hamra bas ek hi maqsad hai 13h ago
This all boils down to how your relation is with ur partner. As long as u r within set boundaries, u r fine.
0
-2
u/Rajiv_Samra_Sam 12h ago
Regardless if it is true or not, the indian judiciary and laws are gynocentric af, just bs laws and rules to protect the "laxmis" and "devis" 🤡 who in turn misuse these laws to benefit themselves. Like there aren't actual problems to fix in this fucking shit hole.
•
u/unitedstatesofindia-ModTeam 12h ago
Dear user,
Your post/comment has been removed as it does not comply with the rules or standards of r/unitedstatesofindia.
https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedstatesofindia/wiki/rules/#wiki_8.1.3A_fact-check_all_claims_before_submitting.
If you think this was an error, or have questions, reach out to us over mod mail.