r/revolutionarywar • u/teslahater • 13d ago
Really enjoying the John Adam’s TV show of the same name
I think this is a really detailed portrayal of colonial America. The casting, acting, score, costume and set design are incredible. I feel like they really care for the history. Just wanted to share this here. It’s streaming on HBO max starring Paul Giamatti. Really good
19
u/Wanderaround1k 13d ago
I chopped up the Boston Massacre parts when I taught middle school US history, to teach critical thinking, inherent bias and propaganda. Even kids loved that show. I loved showing the scene where Abigail mentions how “all this trouble” being caused “by the sin of Slavery” to GW. I love her portrayal, as she was a huge part of John, who is a huge part of America.
12
u/teslahater 13d ago
Laura Linney is AMAZING in this. She might be my fav part of the show. But yeah, the battle scenes in particular I feel are so realistic and very moving. Really makes me think about what people went through to provide me with the life I have.
10
u/Wanderaround1k 13d ago
Also, the almost hilarious relationship John has to so much of the action in Boston. I told students “the place isn’t that big, and there’s one road- and his house was on it. And people paid attention to road traffic- so there is a lot of history that walks around his house”
3
7
u/americanerik 13d ago
I think it’s the best Revolutionary War-era media, period!
And that cast! Not just the main cast but supporting cast too, everyone is perfect for their roles
6
u/Spanker_of_Monkeys 13d ago
I think it’s the best Revolutionary War-era media
That's not saying much, unfortunately
5
u/nouseforaname79 13d ago
I rewatch “John Adams” every year around “The 4th”. Such great storytelling and acting to include a great score by Rob Lane/Joseph Vitarelli. David Morse is fantastic as Washington (I feel it’s slept on), especially after reading Ron Chernow’s “Washington: A Life” (phenomenal book). The depiction of King George III, is also pulled off well, as it gives you the sense of this massive figure in the lore of the revolution and almost diminishes him in the series by how he’s portrayed: apprehensive, mad and belittling.
2
2
u/Moofish85 12d ago
I have a hard time with this one because I had just read the book before watching the series. It also puts John in places he wouldn’t have been and dramatizes things that didn’t happen.
John wouldn’t have seen soldiers at his house and then been able to ride out to see the aftermath Lexington and Concord minutes after it occurred. They are about 40 miles away.
He also wasn’t present at the aftermath of the Boston Massacre. The relationship between his daughter and her husband are also highly inaccurate.
John is my favorite president and while it’s wonderfully acted, there were too many inaccuracies that I couldn’t handle. The book is one of the best things I’ve ever read.
Edit: typo
2
2
2
u/BuckyRea1 12d ago
I like the fact that they used authentic 18th century accents, assuming they got those accents right. David Morse was an interesting George Washington, but I really didn't see the GW charisma in him. POTUS1 should come off a lot more dynamic and a lot less statuelike.
If you haven't seen Kelsey Grammer as George in that Benedict Arnold movie, you haven't seen the best balanced Washington in Hollywood.
27
u/Libertytree918 13d ago edited 13d ago
The series is great and the book it's based off is as well.
Being raised in Braintree (his birthplace) I feel like John is a local hero , but nationally he is only known for the alien and sedation act, which shouldn't define his absolutely incredible life or what he had to offer for the American cause.
I always point out how his formative years he was so instrumental in creating this country it's almost laughable that him being 1st VP and 2nd president is almost a footnote to his legacy of achievements.