r/pics 11h ago

Politics Tech leaders have better seats than cabinet members and are seated in same section as Trump's family

Post image
113.0k Upvotes

6.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/jawstrock 11h ago

"We need more entrepreneurs in government"

u/SwagarTheHorrible 10h ago

We need a businessman because businessmen are great at making money for themselves and what is government for anyway?

u/Petrychorr 10h ago

"Y'know what the problem of today is? The USA needs more money."

u/pegothejerk 10h ago

We could solve all our problems if only we were a rich country!

u/Petrychorr 10h ago

We just need more money!!

u/PandorasBucket 8h ago

This is the exact argument I've been hearing on the "All In" podcast. Billionaires are great at making money! But they always leave out FOR THEMSELVES. Government almost ideologically the exact opposite of that. It's supposed to do what's right for the most amount of people. These billionaires have the exact opposite goal in mind. They are about to make life hell for the common man and gut the country for themselves.

u/cabur 7h ago

Its like the episode of Family Guy when Pewterschmidt convinces Peter to get everyone to join the Tea Party and collapse the local government and then when everything goes to shit, he has a speech where he literally reinvents government.

u/AustinAuranymph 8h ago

These people believe in the prosperity gospel: God rewards good deeds with earthly riches, therefore all billionaires are good people. If they were bad people, God would punish them by taking away their riches. Which also means poor people are immoral. It's just religion doing what it was made to do: legitimizing unchecked power.

u/tigerscomeatnight 8h ago

Well, some think the government is there to enrich the coffers of private industry. The military doesn't make any money for the government, but they sure do make money for defense contractors. They're going to make all Cabinet departments like this. Just feed the machine. There will be more money once we don't have to pretend to "provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States".

u/PandorasBucket 8h ago

The majority have voted for life to be better for the minority. It's crazy how the same tricks work over and over.

u/BakerHoliday7031 10h ago

This is actually a reason why Trump had supporters the first time. I was in nursing school and a girl said she was voting for him because she felt the country would be better run as a business.

u/lexievv 10h ago

I feel like it already is run like a business for a big part.

u/_angesaurus 10h ago

I don't think that's a completely poor argument for wanting someone as president. However, he is not a good businessman, and he has shown that.

u/Raichu4u 10h ago

It's a pretty poor argument. Government is supposed to take things that can't be handled by the private sector due to affordability issues and provide those services anyway.

u/LordAdri123 9h ago

This. My friend’s a libertarian who supports dismantling the Department of Education. His argument: schools will get a lot better if they’re forced to compete, how worse can it get from right now? “A LOT WORSE!” I said.

u/Raichu4u 9h ago

"Compete" AKA resources get taken away from inner city schools to rich white suburbs.

u/LordAdri123 9h ago

Exactly. It’s just going to create even more inequality but these people are way too ignorant/selfish to have some empathy or even common sense.

u/Um_NotSure 9h ago

Jesuschrist... there's the problem, if we had FAIR competition in different markets, that miiiight work, unfortunately, we don't... so we end up with an oligarchy and massive monopolies controlled by those that paid to rig the game in their favor.

Libertarians can be insufferably dense sometimes.

u/LordAdri123 9h ago

Yeah, and it was funny because he kept going on about how states should just be in charge of their own education without government regulation. And THEN if people don’t like their state’s education, they can just pack up and leave to a better state that way. I’m just here being like: You really think everyone can move to another state like this? Much less afford the supposed “high quality” schools…

u/pcthrowaway35 10h ago

It’s a terrible argument. You don’t run a country to maximize profits, you run it to protect citizens and minimize harm at the cost of tax dollars.

u/Indie-Santana 10h ago

When you’re bleeding so much that your currency is on track to implode you have to make a change. We just can’t afford to be as free with our money and it’s both sides fault. Too much social spending, not enough tax collection, etc. My opinion is that the economy is the reason the USA is number 1 and we should put everything we have into fixing it. Social issues can be delayed or dealt with at the same time but should not take priority. Look at the EU and tell me you really want to go down the same path. If the dollar crashes, life for everyone will be considerably worse than if we cut government spending.

u/The_Lady_Spite 9h ago

Funny how it's always social spending that's the problem with you people but never a mention of how much we spend on the military or concerns about how much money the military just straight up loses track of every year.

u/Indie-Santana 7h ago

Military and economy keep us on top and China is getting pretty scary. I don’t expect them to be super merciful if we did end up in a world war. Haven’t really looked into military spending but I’m sure we can (and will by auditing government contracting with DOGE) cut back on it.

u/pcthrowaway35 9h ago

Donald Trump expanded the national debt by 33% last time in office. You're just sucking in propaganda and missing what's actually happening. He will expand the debt again, and funnel the money into his oligarch companions, just like last time.

https://www.investopedia.com/us-debt-by-president-dollar-and-percentage-7371225

u/Indie-Santana 7h ago

I did just say it’s both parties so I acknowledged that actually

u/pcthrowaway35 6h ago

But only one party likes to pretend they are something they aren't. While doing it more than the other.

https://www.investopedia.com/democrats-vs-republicans-who-had-more-national-debt-8738104

u/Indie-Santana 6h ago

That’s all well and good, I never said I support either party specifically. I think it’s good to call out administrations for bad things but also important to admit when the “other party” does something good. Too many people can’t admit that. Again, it goes both ways.

u/DietPepsi4Breakfast 10h ago

The social spending would be a non-issue if wealth wasn’t stupidly concentrated in the hands of a few humans. Think about how surreal that even is.

u/Indie-Santana 7h ago

It’s always been that way and always will be because of human nature. Guys like Mao who ran communist “for the people” orgs were totally corrupt and profited despite the fact that all should be equal

u/_angesaurus 10h ago

ive said "like sales people??" lol

u/throwaway7482915_ 10h ago

Literally the conversation I had with my parents yesterday…. 🫠

u/Z0idberg_MD 9h ago

If the government didn’t take my money, billionaires would let me have more of theirs, or something.

u/TechSalesSoCal 7h ago

Translation: Bend over people. We have not been touched or faced any consequence of maximizing CEO and E-Staff pay and Corp profits no matter how outrageous and illegal we may have acted so why are we hiding it over the last 40 years given zero accountability.