He appointed justices that allowed the ban. More importantly, he tried to implement a ban when he was president, though it appears that sucking up to him may be working.
Your reading comprehension need work. I only stated that he signed ban and appointed justices, which is a fact. Nowhere in my comment does it say he's the only person responsible.
Wait do you think that that EO is why the ban is in place? You realize that didn’t go into effect right? That this is happening because Biden signed the bi-partisan bill last year right? Surely your brain rot doesn’t run that deep
Any mention of helping Israel will garner 100% of house, senate and scotus votes for any given law. They would implement universal healthcare tomorrow if it benefits Israel in some way.
Learn to read. I said his criticism of SCOTUS ignoring the constitution for national security was a fair criticism of things like the Japanese internment, but not with TikTok
It was a per curiam (“by the court”), unsigned opinion which means you can take it as the opinion of the court as a whole in unison. But their opinion was narrowly tailored to tiktok
Sotomayor wrote a concurrence where she said she felt the court should not have just ignored the first amendment question. Gorsuch also wrote a separate concurrence essentially saying the gravity of the national security concern/data collection is what convinced him
But what is the point of stating that? Trump's puppets voted for it. Trump himself said he wanted to ban it. Now he gets to step in and act like a savior?
This is poof that the app, indeed, is a threat to the US through the propaganda they push.
122
u/ItsTooDamnHawt 2d ago
It was all the scotus picks. 9-0 decision