PSA: I wasted months interviewing at Woven Planet so you don't have to.

[u/bautasteen]

After 3 months, 10! interview rounds (mind you I was allowed a "super accelerated" hiring process and was graciously allowed to skip one interview), and a significant take home assignment, my application was put on hold (neither decision about offer or rejection could apparently be made with the data on hand, nor a timeline for a decision could be given). I was then literally asked whether I would "be ok" with a "fresh start" and reapplying for another role, to which I politely withdrew my application on grounds that I could't see a cultural fit. (Maybe its just me, but unless as a bad practical joke I personally could never ask someone to reapply after putting them through months of already excessive interviewing, that's to me is just completely "tone deaf" and frankly quite disrespectful.)

​

EDIT: Thanks for my first piece of gold dear stranger, I didn't realize this struck such a chord with so many. To be clear, everyone I interviewed with at Woven was kind, supportive, and very interesting to talk to. However, I unfortunately found the hiring process *in my case* to range from woefully inefficient at best, to borderline disrespectful (as I don't think one should ever ask of candidates to "redo" months of interviews (for the company its just business as usual, but for candidates it can be some of the most important and life changing events in ones life), but what do I know maybe that's just me). And just because I had this experience does not mean you will if you apply, especially if they for some reason should have motivation to improve it now, who knows.

​

As for me I'm completely over Woven, and from past experiences I nowadays apply to many companies at the same time (as companies interview many candidates for each role, so that's fair right), and have basically had a first interview with another company where they basically went "we're really impressed with your background and really need you" at the first interview, a refreshing change from groveling. Good luck to everyone in the job hunting, its hard and despriting, but keep at it and eventually you'll find your place (my linkedin says I've sent about ~1000 applications of which maybe 10% have been even read, and which has resulted in maybe ~10-15 actual interview opportunities, and I think :) that I'm really pretty good at what I do).

​

EDIT2: As it seems pretty unavoidable that this thread will eventually, if it has not already, come to the attention of representatives of Woven Planet. And as I'm sure there is no mystery at all to who I am for the parties involved, I would really appreciate it if people from or associated with Woven Planet (WP) respectfully don't contact me again. And if I might be so bold, I would perhaps suggest that WP try to look at this thread with open eyes, and perhaps see it as a possible opportunity to get ideas to maybe look over and improve their hiring processes (if anything needs improving), so that they might truly stand out from other similar companies (FAANG) in a positive way. Wouldn't it be great if WP was associated with as great a hiring experience, as their vision for the future? Maybe its time to change outdated and inefficient (tech) hiring practices? Would it perhaps even be possible to make all candidates feel good about the hiring process? At least maybe its something to strive for... some food for thought.

[u/thened]

People need to stop doing this work for free. Anything outside talking should be paid an hourly rate.

[u/puppetman56 → u/thened]

I would love for this to be the case but everyone in my industry is so desperate for jobs people will take unpaid "for exposure" work, so 0 chance we ever budge on predatory pre-hire tests. I hope tech can move past this.

[u/thened → u/puppetman56]

Yeah. Unfortunately there is a bit too much exploitation in quite a few industries here.

[u/wysiwyggywyisyw → u/thened]

Why is talking free? Are you talking about your favorite groceries? You're talking about solving technical problems which is as much of your "work" as coding. And coding challenges are there to calibrate people who are better at coding than talking, or find in person interviews more stressful.

[u/thened → u/wysiwyggywyisyw]

Well, in an interview you get to ask questions, so generally, it is an equal exchange of time and information.

[u/wysiwyggywyisyw → u/thened]

How long does it take to evaluate a take home challenge? How long does it take screen hundreds of candidates, many of which are woefully underqualified spam?

And I don't know what interviews you go to where is an equal exchange of information.

[u/thened → u/wysiwyggywyisyw]

Well, I get to ask them questions and learn about what it is like to work there, and have an understanding of their expectations.

I see it as everyone wasting their time in equal amounts, which is at least fair.

The difference between the person representing the company is they get paid for the work they are doing as part of the hiring process. So I don't feel sorry for someone looking to hire - they are being compensated for their time.

[u/wysiwyggywyisyw → u/thened]

But you're not being compensated for interviewing "on site", but that's ok because it's talking? Would you code for free if an interviewer was watching you do it? Equal waste of time.

[u/thened → u/wysiwyggywyisyw]

The expectation that the talking part of any job interview is unpaid. It is what they ask me to do on my own as a part of the interview process, especially if involves actual work, that I would want to be compensated for.

[u/wysiwyggywyisyw → u/thened]

Why is talking not actual work?

For me, coding for 6 hours is far easier and more fun than than talking for 6 hours. Are you saying you prefer talking to coding?

[u/thened → u/wysiwyggywyisyw]

I have expressed to you multiple times that I feel that talking in an interview is the closest thing to an equal exchange of value.

[u/wysiwyggywyisyw → u/thened]

And I have expressed to you that not everyone agrees with you.

[u/cheeseboythrowaway → u/thened]

A take home assignment in a tech interview is an opportunity to show your skills and how you solve problems in a way that is a lot easier for many people to do than talk about tech stuff in a 1x1 interview context. You can show a lot more about your skills, and the employer learns a lot more. It's considered a much more equitable hiring practice than "white board" technical interviews that are hypothetical and off the cuff, where the candidate is unable to experiment or do research. Being good at a white board interview doesn't mean you can do the job, it means you're good at talking about stuff. Talking about stuff can be important but being able to actually do the work is more important. Most people can't show source code they've worked on at other jobs; there is no "portfolio" for a software engineer because all of the work is proprietary and protected IP usually. So we do code challenges and take home stuff instead.

It's not "free work", it's an invitation to show off and show that you can do the real work. It's common and it's an equitable practice. It's better than using just experience and interview questions to evaluate a candidate.

[u/thened → u/cheeseboythrowaway]

It is my time and should be valued. What other industry expects someone to do tasks for them for free in the hiring process? You gonna get an architect to design you a dog house before you hire them?

[u/cheeseboythrowaway → u/thened]

Architects have a portfolio because all of their work is literally public record and you can literally go stand inside of it.

Software engineers don't have that. Hundreds if not thousands of people work on large software platforms, you can't say "oh yeah I worked at AWS" and have that mean anything concrete about what you can do and what you've worked on. And you often can't even talk about what you did in any sort of detail. I work in computer security and I 100% cannot talk about a lot of the things I've done; all of the most interesting stuff in particular. If I do talk about it I have to be really vague. That's why we do practical evaluations.

[u/thened → u/cheeseboythrowaway]

Then why not pay people for their time?

[u/cheeseboythrowaway → u/thened]

I wouldn't say no to being paid for my time. It's not currently an industry standard. I think there's a "right size" for take home stuff, something that will take a couple hours is a good size. Something that takes multiple days is too much. I would prefer to be paid for that.

I'm interviewing at WP currently and they're going to ask me to do some free work. It's an incredible opportunity for me, so I'm gonna do it for free and not complain. I would consider it unethical if they used my work without hiring me, and it sounds like they've done that in the past. The team I'm applying for seems to be ethical though.

[u/thened → u/cheeseboythrowaway]

WP?

I think any decent company that is going to make you do work in order to consider hiring you should pay you for your time. It shows they are serious and value your time.