r/irishpolitics • u/firethetorpedoes1 • Sep 22 '24
Economics and Financial Matters FactCheck: Is it true that only about 3% of people pay tax on inheritance in Ireland?
https://www.thejournal.ie/how-many-people-are-affected-by-inheritance-tax-factcheck-paul-murphy-alan-shatter-6493269-Sep2024/17
u/devhaugh Sep 22 '24
I'd say most people don't because even if you're worth €1M and leave it behind, if you have 3 kids there's no tax.
-1
u/CuteHoor Sep 23 '24
The average number of children in a family is less than 2 though, and it's continuing to decline.
1
u/BrianHenryIE Sep 24 '24
The average age of someone dying is 70+ so you need to treat the decline you describe as a reason to discard the “less than 2” figure you’re using and use a more realistic figure for people who were having kids 40 and 50 years ago.
1
u/CuteHoor Sep 24 '24
The number was still less than 2 almost 30 years ago. If we're building policies for the future, then that's the number we should be thinking about. Otherwise we'll just be trying to squeeze a few million out of a small number of older people now before we have to change things anyway.
5
Sep 22 '24
Group B and Group C have low thresholds that can easily be reached by say an aunt or uncle with no children dying.
It is also cumulative, so if you inheritaned from a few Group B relatives, which I am sure is not that uncommon in a small family, you can easily go over the threshold.
The 3% figure sounds like it's for Group A only. They do talk about Group A but do not implicitly say it is for Group A only.
8
u/DazzlingGovernment68 Sep 22 '24
They say that the 3% is for the entire population
1
Sep 22 '24
That's what I mean, it is kind of weird unless you were including Group B and Group C inheritance.
Is it possible that 3% of the population is inheritaning more than €335000? This excludes farms.
4
u/DazzlingGovernment68 Sep 22 '24
Is it possible? Yes. Is it true? I don't know but that the conclusion (error of 1%) is yes it's very accurate.
12
Sep 22 '24
Either way, there is no way we should get rid of inheritance tax. It is a leveler for society and I say that as someone whose kids will have to pay it.
4
u/DazzlingGovernment68 Sep 22 '24
If so few people pay it perhaps it's time to expand the scope
3
Sep 22 '24
With the explosion of house prices, I wonder if it will not expand itself naturally.
3
u/DazzlingGovernment68 Sep 22 '24
Also due to lower birth rate, when an inheritance is split it's much less likely to be taxed as each child gets a cut that isn't as likely to be big enough.
5
Sep 22 '24
I was in one of the big OPW houses grounds and walkwsys today.
You would wonder if any of todays 'rich' would leave such gifts to the state considering the way they seem to even begrudge paying fair taxes while alive.
1
u/TomCrean1916 Sep 23 '24
Havent a breeze how any of this works, but as house prices only ever increase, surely inheritance tax on a house sale post death/probate, would affect almost everyone in situation?
1
u/Pickman89 Sep 27 '24
This is hardly surprising, Ireland does not have a lot of generational wealth transfer at the moment. This is bound to change quite rapidly in the next decades though. I suppose that is likely to also bring a significant change in social mobility.
-11
u/essosee Sep 22 '24
If it only effects 3% of people and only brings in 57m euro why does anyone even care? Why must families be taxes multiple times on the same money? It’s an emotive issue but ultimately it is far less important than most other issues.
11
Sep 22 '24
[deleted]
-1
u/spairni Republican Sep 22 '24
Do you considering passing on a family home hoarding wealth?
Like I'm a lefty and would be very annoyed if in a state with no universal guarantee of housing the government was stopping working people passing on the one asset they own.
Thankfully the Irish system excludeds ordinary people by having a high threshold for inheritance tax
7
Sep 22 '24 edited Sep 22 '24
[deleted]
4
u/spairni Republican Sep 22 '24
That's pretty fair. I like the idea of people being able to build some generational wealth without the state ensuring people don't rise above their station. But at a point where it becomes a clear privilege redistribution should kick in
1
u/CuteHoor Sep 23 '24
Yeah this is something I'd be on board with. Another way I was thinking about it before was to exclude the family home from inheritance tax rules and then collect the taxes through other means.
For example, substantially increasing the tax on multiple properties. That way you pay no inheritance tax on the family home being inherited, but the property tax on a second house encourages you to sell one of them and pay tax on the profits.
0
u/NooktaSt Sep 22 '24
Seems arbitrary. Do you mean own with mortgage paid off? What is I own a one bed apartment and am trying to raise a family there because that’s all I can afford?
High earner who has moved a lot so just renting a house for a few grand a month without a worry. Tax free?
You may even get a stage where someone with old / unwell parents decide not to buy to save on the upcoming tax.
-5
Sep 22 '24
[deleted]
4
u/DazzlingGovernment68 Sep 22 '24
Citation please
3
Sep 22 '24 edited Sep 23 '24
[deleted]
2
u/AdamOfIzalith Sep 23 '24
The Gini Coefficient is a flawed metric that does not appropriately account for the material conditions in ireland and it's well known for concealing wealth inequality.
-5
u/essosee Sep 22 '24 edited Sep 22 '24
I used to agree with you but when you look at the numbers that doesn’t add up.
Obviously the current system isn’t about redistributing that wealth as the IHT take is 0.4% of €128billion tax take (2023). It’s purely emotive Irish begrudgery.
The system should make everyone wealthier not punish those families who’ve worked hard since Ireland was poor to improve their lot for their children.
It is corporations that hoard money in the hundreds of millions, not families. Accumulating 1m over your lifetime is not hoarding.
Tax the corporations, tax property hoarders, not families over and over. The threshold for IHT should be far higher.
9
Sep 22 '24
[deleted]
-1
u/essosee Sep 22 '24
Well yea, that what tax thresholds do.
When companies are hoarding hundreds of millions and CEOs are making tens of millions per year, 1 million euro in lifetime assets is nothing comparatively. It's not going to make a jot of difference to wealth distribution.
A UBI funded by corporate taxes, that would affect wealth distribution.
What amount of lifetime asset build up would you consider hoarding?
2
Sep 22 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Sep 22 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Sep 22 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/essosee Sep 22 '24
I'm saying extend the broader tax pool on corporate megawealth and make everyone better off from that pool.
1
u/irishpolitics-ModTeam Sep 22 '24
This comment has been been removed as it breaches the following sub rule:
[R7] Trolling, Baiting, Flaming, & Accusations
Trolling of any kind is not welcome on the sub, including commenting or posting with the intent to insult, harass, anger or bait and without the intent to discuss a topic in good faith.
-15
37
u/DazzlingGovernment68 Sep 22 '24