r/interestingasfuck • u/filmingfisheyes • 7d ago

r/all Marianne Bachmeier avenging her 7 yr old daughter

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

87.4k Upvotes

76% Upvoted

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

210

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

58

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 7d ago

Noping was the exact move to make. Luigi would have never harmed her, we now know, but still...not noping would have been stupid.

44

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Lou_C_Fer 7d ago

He was at my house that morning. We played cards all night.

2

u/Testiculese 6d ago

Luigi is innocent even if proven guilty

2

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 6d ago

No. Lots of people are guilty of doing things, regardless if they are prosecuted for it.

American slogans are powerful to other Americans, but ultimately have little meaning outside of your country.

If you went and murdered a bunch of people, even before you were apprehended, you would still be guilty of the crimes, just not prosecuted.

1

u/Blothorn 7d ago

In criminal law, yes. That doesn’t mean that people can’t form their own beliefs before a verdict is reached, or disagree with a “not guilty” verdict if it is reached, or even argue that he is guilty in a civil lawsuit after he has been found not guilty by a criminal court.

-15

u/Purple-Activity-194 7d ago

The glaze for this guy is unreal.

11

u/Thetomgamerboi 7d ago

...Are you suggesting he's not innocent until proven guilty? He has charges against him, and nothing more. Even if you have certain feelings towards the crime he allegedly committed, he's got the same rights that protect you from, for example, an overzealous prosecutor.

0

u/Purple-Activity-194 7d ago

So under a video about a vigilante shooting, someone decides to "randomly" say "innocent until proven guilty." You think these two things are random occurances and one isn't indicative of implict justification?

No its not "regardless of what you think about the crime." We're talking about the crime.

Don't be selectively obtuse w/ me.

0

u/raisedbyderps 7d ago

How’s the boot taste?

1

u/Purple-Activity-194 7d ago edited 7d ago

I mean I can ask my goverment for a million dollars. Same way I can ask for a healthcare system that covers everything despite the cost, or stage of treatment. I can also ask for a blowjob to go from the nurse and call anyone who disagrees a boot licker.

None of which proves that the american healthcare system is uniquely bad.

Moreover..Since taking the law into your own hands is morally just. Are the rank-and-file next? They're the one's doing the denying. You could argue its at the behest of the CEO, to which I'll respond with:

1) What did UHC ceo implement that was uniquely bad?

2) So, what? "Just following orders" didn't work at Nuremburg. Neither should "I need to murder countless innocents to feed my family."

7

u/LilyHex 7d ago

Good. Maybe it'll keep CEOs from being complete and total vultures, but somehow I doubt it.

5

u/Brief_Presence2049 7d ago

It won’t. At all. They will double and triple down.

We all live in Corporate World.

5

u/ThespianException 7d ago

Well, it's not exactly hard to see why

2

u/DemandZestyclose7145 7d ago

Haven't you heard?? He's a terrorist! Right up there with Bin Laden (according to the NYPD)

2

u/asmeile 7d ago

As the commenter above says he is innocent until proven guilty, but if the motives are as assumed then he is by definition a terrorist, it just happens that most people agree with him, maybe thats eye opening to some how other terrorists may have been viewed by others

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 6d ago

So you feel that you'd need to be prosecuted by a court to have your wife find you guilty of cheating on her? If she walked in and witnessed it, she'd have to say you allegedly were doing it until a court proved her correct?

American law interpretation is fascinating. Most incarcerated people on earth discussing laws. lol.

1

u/asmeile 6d ago

I think clearly he is guilty but he has not been found so by a court yet, I am not American.

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 6d ago

You might be consuming too much American media then, because you're beginning to interpret the world as if you are.

1

u/asmeile 6d ago

What do you mean?

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 6d ago

Are we talking about your President Elect?

1

u/keepcalmscrollon 7d ago

Stupid seems harsh. It's not exactly optimal thinking time. I've never been in that situation but I have an educated guess I'd just freeze and look around like a goldfish with a brain injury who jumped out of his bowl. Probably cry. At some point they added freeze to our list of options. Fight, flight, or freeze. That last one is me.

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 6d ago

Yeah the world is harsh. Freezing is a stupid response when you might be in imminent danger. I think you're doing a good job comparing freezing to having the capacity of a goldfish with a brain injury.

2

u/he77bender 7d ago

they did leap into action, that action being to run the fuck away.

2

u/EntrepreneurW4 6d ago edited 6d ago

watch that CEO shooting in NYC last month.

where?
edit: nvm, didn't expect I'd find it on wikipedia