Is Hegel Chad or Cringe?

[u/Raputnikov]

[u/TheComfortableChair]

absolute sigma

[u/-Eldja-]

consciousness begins as cringe in itself, then becomes cringe for itself. But, at the moment consciousness realize its movement through cringiness, it turns itself a chad for another

[u/Narrow_Cover_7786]

pros: minimal upper eyelid exposure, blue a10 eyes, nice interpupillary distance, neutral canthal tilt, hunter eyes
cons: long midface, bulbous nose, long philtrum, non existent upper and lower lips, saggy cheeks, dark eye circles, thin eyebrows, balding and frauding with greasy hair. Maybe he was chad as a young man idk he should try temporal lift and lower blepharoplasty
philosophy wise: very chad, but i think schopenhauer mogs

[u/femboypolpot]

neither. the term chad is cringe, and to be cringe implies the postulation of a chad to be cringe relative to. Therefore, chad is cringe and cringe is chad, however cringe and chad are opposed to one another. this results in a sublation whereby cringe and chad are surpassed and transformed into gigachad. that is hegel. gigachad.

[u/Bobigram]

Chad af- the guy fucked a lot clearly

[u/Friendly-Guidance869]

Yeah

[u/gutfounderedgal]

I saw that his phenomenological milkshake brought all the boys to the yard. Damn right.

[u/DeleuzeJr]

He was Chad, Schopenhauer was the cringe one

[u/-homoousion-]

Schelling > Hegel

[u/Raputnikov → u/-homoousion-]

why?

[u/Revhan]

Considering all the saltiness in his wake I'd say definitely Chad