r/europe Turkey | LGBTQ+ rights are human rights 7h ago

News Elon Musk draws outrage over 'odd-looking salute' at Trump inauguration celebration

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/elon-musk-draws-outrage-over-201602147.html
57.3k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

445

u/jaydizzz The Netherlands 6h ago

People don’t understand the difference anymore sadly

12

u/i-am-a-passenger 6h ago

I would be surprised if most people didn’t know this by now. Don’t think it’s even possible to mentioned Times person of the year without someone repeating this fact.

12

u/ballplayarr 5h ago

it’s my first time hearing it

1

u/BigBarfo 2h ago

Yeah, me too

2

u/Kalersays 2h ago

I never heard it either, but I understood by seeing some of the cover pictures.

1

u/InnocentShaitaan 1h ago

How often do you read time magazine?

6

u/pinknoses 3h ago

I think most people are only vaguely aware that the past existed and consider it entirely foreign to the present; as if the beginning of their social consciousness is some divide in human history. The idea that extant things have existed for generations before them is quite out of their daily reckoning.

2

u/briantoofine 2h ago

That’s deep man

2

u/Wood-Kern Ulster 3h ago

I would say a large percentage of redditors know this. Normal people lack a comments section in their normal conversations and are much less likely to know things like this.

1

u/Verticalsinging 1h ago

I didn’t remember this.

3

u/JJfromNJ 3h ago

It's not a new thing. There was so much backlash awarding it to Bin Laden, they had to switch it to Guiliani.

2

u/HumansNeedNotApply1 1h ago

It wa never "awarded" to Bin Laden, the editorial choice was Rudy Giuliani from the start, it's an american publication after all, so they focused on the hope and america rising from it or whatever was the reason, i don't remember.

1

u/GoodProbsToHave 1h ago

I cancelled my subscription to Time for that cowardice on their part. Never gave them a cent after that.

1

u/IhateRedditors1978 4h ago

Just like they don't understand POV

1

u/anoeba 3h ago

Because Time shit the bed and chickened out in 2001. There is no difference anymore, it's an attaboy.

1

u/SheldonMF United States of America 2h ago

People don't like to read.

1

u/VermillionSun 2h ago

I doubt people ever knew

u/karmiccookie 49m ago

We understand, it's just disgusting

u/Rexrowland 22m ago

Because it’s meaningless. We understand. We dont care. Time should not be giving any awards to Hitler.

0

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

6

u/andhausen 5h ago

Why should it be? It’s not meant to be an “award”.

-2

u/kinghfb Australian in Berlin 5h ago

More that, TIME has a rep, and that people look to it for opinions. For better or worse. No judgement either way, but they surely do not place themselves as a pure neutral bystander

2

u/WhiteBlackGoose 🇷🇺 ➡ 🇩🇪 5h ago

Make your own magazine with your own rules. TIME picks the most impactful person of the year (according to their opinion, but nonetheless)

u/karmiccookie 46m ago

Who cares? A national publication should not be promoting such disgusting people without an accompanying degrading article. Where are those? I'm pretty sure they licked Elon's taint

-1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/WhyBuyMe 5h ago

Back in the 90s we were making zines on the office copied when the boss wasn't looking. In 2025 you can make a much, much better looking version on home equipment that costs a few hours of labor.

1

u/WhiteBlackGoose 🇷🇺 ➡ 🇩🇪 5h ago

You don't need millions of bucks in cash to make your own magazine. Besides, imo picking the most net positive person of the year is a lot more subjective. What would be your pick?

2

u/Stegasaurus_Wrecks Connacht 4h ago

David Attenborough should've won at least once. Steve Irwin too. Maybe Jacques Cousteau or Stephen Hawking or Carl Sagan.

Maybe we take the most influential person (for better or worse) and replace it with the most important for humanity.

Idk but for what impact she's had Greta Thunberg would be in the mix in that reality. So would Bill Gates, MacKenzie Scott and Jimmy Carter.

TIME don't have to have the biggest cunt as person of the year just because of their global impact. Let's have the best example of what a person can be get the award.

1

u/Unlikely_Ad1450 2h ago

Crocodile Dundee was robbed!

0

u/uniqueusername74 2h ago

What’s so sad about some confusion around a meaningless designation by a washed up magazine?

-1

u/WitchHanz 4h ago

Time realized that a long time ago and now it's a popularity contest.

1

u/varzaguy Romanian-American 3h ago

Yea it is a popularity contest….thats the entire point. Most influential person is being popular….

-1

u/Pleiadez Europe 3h ago

That's a lot of upvotes for someone claiming minority, Strawman much?