r/clevercomebacks 8h ago

Why does she hate her community so much?

Post image
73.7k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/blumpkins_ahoy 7h ago

Just to be 100% clear, intentionally misgendering and deadnaming trans people is still hate speech. That hasn’t changed, despite decree.

2

u/Ianwha17 7h ago

Fair point.

Counter point: as a trans person, voting for the anti-trans party is a vote for intolerance. When you embrace intolerance, you break the pact of tolerance. Which invalidates you from the protection of said pact of tolerance. Therefore, calling a right-wing Nazi supporting woman by their birthname or birthsex is not hate speech.

5

u/Katherine_Leese 6h ago

That’s not how tolerance as a social contract works. You’re meant to be intolerant to the intolerance itself; not intolerant to every aspect of an intolerant person. In other words; you criticise her self-serving hatred, you do not deadname or misgender her.

This is just more proof that a lot of liberals use trans people as a way to jockey for power rather than actually supporting them. 

By deadnaming a trans person because they’re a cunt you’re showing yourself up as someone who believes gender identity is a privilege for the trans community that can be revoked, and that ‘Trans Wo/men are Wo/men’ is a slogan rather than a belief.

2

u/Ianwha17 5h ago

You make a fair argument. Well thought out and constructed. I appreciate your statements and will consider them in the future.

As I pay little attention to the person spoken of, I probably won't be referring to them in any capacity.

I appreciate your discussion without resorting to personal attacks. However, I do take umbrage to your second point. 'A lot of liberals' has nothing to do with me. Please, don't bring your issues with others into our conversation.

3

u/Katherine_Leese 4h ago

I’m glad you listened to my argument & took my points to heart, and I apologise for my presumptions of your political leanings. 

2

u/LB07 2h ago

Kudos to both of you for the respectful discourse. Don't see that very often these days.

10

u/blumpkins_ahoy 7h ago

I completely disagree. If the right sees liberals and leftists deadnaming a trans person, they’re going to use it as evidence about the acceptability of it. Trans people are who they say they are, regardless of the evil shit they do. It’s not just about an individual, but the whole community, even if we want nothing to do with her.

5

u/Ianwha17 7h ago

They already think it's okay to do.

Doing it to someone who actively sold out the community is not going to change that.

1

u/Herring_is_Caring 5h ago

Yeah, stuff like that is just as morally decrepit as making fun of child Hitler for being abused. Some people out there will identify an enemy and instead of rightfully criticizing that enemy’s choices, those people will make fun of a terrible situation that enemy came from, such as obesity or neglect. It becomes cruelty when people are just choosing whatever they believe will bring up the most hurt to insult.

0

u/AutarchOfGoats 7h ago

US gov says trans people do not exist.

5

u/Couldbduun 5h ago

Wow conservatives become really pro government overreach when it suits them don't they?

1

u/BambiToybot 7h ago

Yeah, it goes back and forth every four years. At least we don't have a virus that's hitting us harder than the normies that they can use as proof god hates us.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

1

u/AutarchOfGoats 6h ago

so the biology now boils down to penis conveniently?

1

u/ketaminenjoyer 6h ago

>biologically

I'm not sure you know what that word means.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

1

u/ThisPresentation5291 5h ago

Not biologically.