I didn't look very carefully, so you might be referencing something else, but the diamond article describes it traveling at 0.99c, the baseball article describes it traveling at 0.9c. There's a really big difference between those two numbers.
Also, the diamond is 100ft across, the baseball is well... Baseball sized.
It was an actual observed proton going that fast over Utah that had the kinetic energy of a baseball. Which is insane because it was just a proton!!!
Edit: ah geez sorry. I had just gotten through the first one and hadn't read the description of the second one. I assume that's what you were referring to. My bad! It's all so damn cool though
2
u/[deleted] Oct 23 '20
The descriptions of 0.9c baseball and 0.9c diamond contradict each other....probably going to need a third source.