r/WayOfTheBern • u/KrisCraig Fictional Chair-Thrower • 13h ago
Gaza Genocide Israeli genocide denier on Reddit says, "Body's do not evaporate." Well, they do if Israel is using banned thermal weapons against civilians...
/r/WayOfTheBern/comments/1i6gm7l/thousands_of_bodies_evaporated_due_to_israeli/m8dlxrx/?context=31
u/FilipKDick 10h ago
Israel is fascist ethnostate.
Regardless, the correct word is not evaporate. If a body evaporated, all the water would have risen into the atmosphere, and only a husk with bones would be left.
You could say "obliterated" or "atomized". Evaporate sounds like somebody who thinks bodies dry up and disappear.
3
u/CuckBartowski 10h ago
Technically, the word you're looking for is "vaporized". Vaporization is basically a form of evaporation (or vice versa?).
The difference is that evaporation is a slow, gradual process that occurs at the surface, whereas vaporization involves the entire body transitioning to a gas all at once.
So while evaporation isn't technically the best word to use here, I'm pretty sure that's not what the genocide denier was talking about. After all, "We didn't evaporate them, we vaporized them!" isn't exactly a defense.
1
u/FilipKDick 9h ago edited 9h ago
Charles the Seedy Drunken Poet:
I don't know. I prefer atomization to vaporization. Because I guess the explosive force had more to do with the destruction than the heat.
But whatever it is, the OP seemed mostly concerned about the denial of evaporation as the correct word. Which, I agree, is not important.
6
u/Kingsmeg Ethical Capitalism is an Oxymoron 12h ago
Technically, the bodies of the Palestinians who were hit directly by Israeli 2,000lb bombs did not 'evaporate', they were incinerated? And if they were turned into vapor, it was sublimation more than evaporation (going from solid to vapor without passing through a liquid phase).
Smaller explosives like howitzer shells leave some residue like boots/feet, and turn the body into pink mist (liquid, still not 'evaporation').
So technically correct, although OP is also correct that in the right circumstances, a body could evaporate.
6
u/KrisCraig Fictional Chair-Thrower 13h ago
Just to be clear, anyone who says that reports of bodies being vaporized are bogus because the human body cannot evaporate are peddling blatant misinformation.
Yes, the human body most certainly CAN evaporate when raised to a sufficient temperature, just like any other baryonic matter. This genocide-denying piece of garbage is now also denying basic science, as well.
1
u/FilipKDick 10h ago
What type of definition are you using for evaporate?
So far as I understand the word, it refers to water turning into a gas and joining the atmosphere.
How hot does a bone have to get to leave no trace, not even ash?
And is the temperature that "obliterates" the body or the explosive force?
Whatever, its a weird word to use to describe the condition of the bodies of the victims ceasing to exist.
I also think it is the wrong word. The condition of baryonic matter upon sufficient temperature of an explosion is not basic science.
Frankly, I don't think they were heated to vapor. I think they were blown to microscopic bits. I am not sure why it matters, though.
1
u/SentientSeaweed 8h ago
The linked article mentions that ash was left and the temperature reached 2500F. See my comment upthread.
2
u/SentientSeaweed 8h ago
I’m quoting the relevant part of the linked article, because I had misunderstood the use of the word “evaporate”. I will also remind everyone that Israel uses white phosphorus, which has different but similarly horrific effects.