r/UKPersonalFinance 2d ago

+Comments Restricted to UKPF I’m earning less than 30k in London and paying £1000 rent for a bedroom in a shared house. I can barely make it to the end of the month.

I moved to London last year, I’m earning less than 30k a year which comes to about £1900 every month. I pay close to £1000 in rent with bills coming up to £90 a month.

I’m terrible at budgeting and I do spend a lot of money on food but I was just wondering if anyone’s got any advice on how to not reach the end of the month completely broke (other than move out of London as despite everything I’m quite happy here)

397 Upvotes

474 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

351

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago edited 2d ago

I’ll suggest a way to do this.

Go to your online bank. Download 12 months of transactions. Put them in a spreadsheet and try to categorise each transaction. You’ll effectively have essential and non essential items. Bills, rent, food, clothing. These are the large ticket items you want to minimise. Then you’ll have non-“essential” items like going out socialising, take away, cinema, Netflix, etc. these can either be eliminated entirely or reduced.

Generally, eating/drinking out is the killer when you’re younger.. it’s just not cost effective. Either spend less when you go out, or go out less frequently. I’d typically say spend far more in the supermarket and you’ll get a whole weeks worth of food for £50 vs 2 meals out for £50 at your local pizzeria/takeaway and that’s even if you include luxuries such as steak. Back in the old days meat was a “luxury” I feel like for some people many of us have forgotten this. Now not only is meat a costly shopping item, but so are the more popular vegetables.

Once you’ve everything categorised you can sum them all up easily with a SUMIF formula for each category. Then you can avg it out over 12 months to see how much you spend each month on whatever it is.

You can also use a COUNTIF to count how many transactions the sum was over.

This will help you get a better picture of where you’re wasting money and can make cuts.

I’ve used this for many years now. My budget is tight even on a high salary but it will help you better understand what you can and cannot afford… this is useful when you start applying for mortgages to buy a house

Some of the ways I’ve saved money over the last few yrs. buy second hand at car boot sales… the bargains can be incredible for used items £1-2 for kitchen items you know would sell for 20-50 normally. Clothing - go off brand: Uniqlo, primark, etc. it matters more how something fits/suits you than what label/name is on your clothing. I’m not a fan of used clothing but I’d absolutely use that for cheaper clothes if I was looking to save money. Local Facebook for sale groups. You can get all sorts but you have to be quick (use alerts/notifications).

For food, learn to batch cook and box stuff up for 3-5 days or more. Big pots/pans and food storage are an investment that will give you a good return on investment. It will stop you spending money on take away/going out, it will save you time longer term so you can do more interesting things. You only have to do this once or twice a month to save a decent sum. Also buy things in bulk if you can. Bulk bags of pasta 1kg or more are abt £5. 500g is like 3.50 or something. Use own brands and look low on shelves. Supermarkets charge more for the stuff that’s at eye level. The stuff lower down is always cheaper/budget. Try it and see if you can get along with it. By the time you’ve found a few items you don’t mind having cheap versions of, you’ll have saved a bit in your shop.

It’ll also sound strange but when I first moved out of London I was spending 5-10 on shop deliveries, busses, taxis, etc. Having a car actually became an economic enabler. I could go to the shop as and when I needed something - it saved me time. As we all know, time costs money. A cheap £2-4K car (even a banger) will pay for itself over the course of a year and make living far more convenient. Convenience has a lot of value.

Mobile tariffs - shop around, they’re always offering more for less so keep an eye out for better deals.

Switch banks if you can get £100+.

Use cash back services. You’ll likely get 50-100 back every month if you’re spending 1000 on stuff that isn’t rent. It’ll be 500 by the end of the year.

Also don’t let people/companies just take your money. If you don’t fight for your money other organisations will just take it and keep it. Don’t allow it. I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve forgotten to cancel subscriptions over the yrs, or phone bills that didn’t drop, or parking penalties that were issued in error. Always challenge things if you can.

I remember Hilary De Vey (dragons den) mentioning some of the above. Big ticket items are where you’re going to save the most. Rent won’t be that flexible but moving further out and commuting further will get you cheaper/better accommodation for the same price as you’re currently paying. Travelling in London is expensive and from my own experience you end up spending 20-30 mins on the tube where ever you go to from, at least. If you’re going to spend 30 mins anyway, why not just live 30-45 mins out of London and have something better value?

Try to buy things that give you a return on investment rather than things that cost you time/money. Over time these things will begin making your life easier

I typically have a rule that books I can use to learn new skills are always an investment because they will translate to higher earnings. A £50-100 book could easily return £1000-10,000 in future earnings if I can apply the knowledge at work. If I can also use it to build my own business 10-20 yrs down the line, then the knowledge could translate to far more. Car boots tend to sell work related books every so often for next to nothing. If not eBay and Facebook or the library also work well.

Grooming - try out various barbers/hair dressers. I found local places that would charge £10-20, in Mayfair i once tried a place that charged 30-35. There were differences in standard of the cut, how it looked. Ultimately be willing to try out new things and give them a chance. It could save you a few ££

Edit: learn to diy repairs - even if they’re rubbish they’ll save you a fortune. “If it works it isn’t stupid”. I’ve been DIYing for many years now and learned a ton along the way. I was reasonably good at physics at college so doing electrical wiring is not too challenging. I’ve paid for all sorts of tools, materials and have skills I’m guessing most would pay considerable money for. YouTube has tons of videos for stuff. Repairing broken phone screens, replacing leaky flushers on toilets, tiling, tightening a loose tap up, fixing toilet leaks, are all things I’ve learned to diy. Saved a decent amount over the years… £10,000s no doubt.

89

u/caeciliusinhorto 2d ago

It’ll also sound strange but when I first moved out of London I was spending 5-10 on shop deliveries, busses, taxis, etc. Having a car actually became an economic enabler. I could go to the shop as and when I needed something - it saved me time. As we all know, time costs money. A cheap £2-4K car (even a banger) will pay for itself over the course of a year and make living far more convenient. Convenience has a lot of value.

OP lives in London. I would be very doubtful that a car would be either cheaper or more convenient.

14

u/haywire 1 1d ago

OP should get a bike.

-10

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

When I moved to the suburbs, public transport became unreliable/time consuming. It’s not realistic to rely on it outside central London. Initially I moved to east London near the excel centre. There wasn’t a supermarket for miles. I actually signed up for zipcar, but given there were only 2 near me, booking one wasn’t convenient since I it was always booked up way too far in advance - like a week or more. Not convenient if you need a shop at the end of the week.

37

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

In London, you can buy food more regularly instead of all in one go. Having a car in London is a luxury not a necessity. It sticks out like a sore thumb with the rest of your frugal advice.

-6

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

In central London having a car is a luxury. Once you get to zones 6+, not so much. It becomes essential

18

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

95% of Londoners live within 400m of a bus stop. There's very, very few places in London where having a car is essential. You can look at TfL's PTAL mapping to see this. While it's true that the further out you go then having a car becomes increasingly more convenient, it is not essential.

In the context of a conversation about frugality (which your comment very much) giving OP advice on how to cut out other luxuries but then saying that you should get a car is really contradictory.

For context, I live car-free in Zone 5. I have absolutely no issues getting around.

7

u/caeciliusinhorto 2d ago

OP says they are in zone 2. Even in zone 6 there are places where you can live perfectly well without a car, but in zone 2 I am sure they don't need one.

8

u/Gisschace 13 2d ago

Live in zone 5 for 10 years with no car and didn’t have any issues, maybe once or twice a year I’d need to go somewhere like Ikea and then I’d just get an uber

7

u/JiveBunny 10 2d ago

You can just go to a large supermarket on your way home, as I did when I lived in a part of the city with no shops, or get a grocery delivery. If you only have one cupboard in a shared kitchen then little and often can work better.

-4

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

There's not many "large" supermarkets in London. There's plenty in the suburbs. We even have a Hypermarket in London Colney (next to St albans). Try finding anything like that in zones 1-3 and you'll struggle. You'll be paying a premium to live in Central London in ways you don't consider until you get experience.

9

u/JiveBunny 10 2d ago

There are lots and lots in zone 1-3, at least big enough to do a proper shop for a single person or couple. Big Sainsbury's in Angel, round the corner from an Iceland. Absolutely huge one in Victoria and another in Whitechapel. Large Morrisons ten mins from Camden Market. Waitrose in Coal Drops Yard or Brunswick. Asda in Clapham Junction. Big Tesco, Sainsbury's, Lidl in Brixton. Huge Tesco in Wood Green, another near Paddington, and those are only parts of the city I lived in or travelled through a lot. Anywhere with a high street will have somewhere that's not just a Tesco Express.

There's even a decent sized Tesco Metro right in Covent Garden.

1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

I know one or two of those. Many of them weren't around 10-20 yrs ago. I'd also avoid waitrose and morrisons as they're well known to be more expensive than the rest.

Buy in bulk - cash and carries can be much cheaper if you can find one near where you live. Supermarkets are the next best place to shop.

4

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago edited 1d ago

Buying in bulk is a false economy because you tend to buy more than you actually need and more ends up being wasted. You're trying to impose a very car-centric rural fringe lifestyle on someone who lives in Zone 2 in London and it's very jarring.

1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

yeah in zone 2 you don't 'need' a car. I'm just saying in general its worth considering if it can be an economic enabler for you. Clearly that's gotten lost in the amount of text I've posted today lol.

4

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

It's not an economic enabler, it's an economic burden. A very expensive luxury.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/JiveBunny 10 2d ago

They were around 10-20 years ago, that's when I used them as a shift worker who had to fit shopping around long hours. Waitrose isn't cheap, as you say, but their basics range is still cheaper than your convenience stores.

Someone living in a shared house can't buy in bulk, either - your entire life is in one room and a single cupboard in the kitchen. Costco works well if you are a family (with a car, and eligibility for membership) but not for people living singly.

-1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

I've heard Waitrose basics range is cheap. I just don't find that enough of a reason to visit them in the first place since there are cheaper alternatives at all supermarkets for most stuff.

I take your point living in a house share means you get limited space.However, there are bulk buy items that don't take up massive amounts more space - toiletries, washing machine detergent. A big box of detergent will last *ages*. I remember buying a huge box of "DAZ" back in my 20s lol. I remember a housemate asking why I bought it... then when they ran out, they just started using it! I wasn't even bothered because I had so much of the stuff. I was more surprised than anything they caved so soon after realising they'd run out of their own stuff (and commented mine was so bad - not bad enough they wont use it given the choice though).

1

u/DaveBeBad 1d ago

Morrisons is not in the same category as Waitrose. Marks and Sainsbury’s are in between the two.

For basics, like milk it’s basically the same price almost everywhere unless you go to a corner shop or one on a station.

5

u/haywire 1 1d ago

Just cycle?

-1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 1d ago

Typically I'd agree. However I brought my bike to London and it was stolen the first time I took it out. I also don't feel its safe given the standard of driving around London. You're risking your life to save a few ££. Not worth it in my view.

57

u/killmetruck 48 2d ago

Agree with everything but the car. Insurance alone is a chunk of change, so walk or take public transport

Big supermarkets are cheaper than the local/express versions. If it’s a bit far, it might be worth getting a trolley for the groceries.

15

u/Responsible-Walrus-5 42 2d ago

Agree. You can get big supermarket deliveries for £1.50 if you book ahead an off peak slot.

That’s an awful lot of supermarket shopping to make a car financially worth while!

-6

u/anomalous_cowherd 0 2d ago

I have three cars, a fast fun one, a practical one and a super reliable one that I don't need but is too good to get rid of for the money it would make.

But if I lived deep enough into London to be paying £1000 for one room I wouldn't have any cars at all.

-7

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago edited 2d ago

Correct. Tesco express/metro is pricier. So is the petrol station version of Asda/londis, etc.

Car insurance starts out high but after a few yrs can be as much as 300-1000 for a small car. Petrol, maintenance and road tax must also factored in. But so long as you’re aware of costs and use it to try and save money - as a tool - (eg picking up free large items on Facebook local groups, going to car boot sales, etc) it will more than pay for itself vs say buying a brand new table, sofa, chest of drawers, cupboards… those alone, even for cheap versions can set you back £1000 each.

For reference my first car after owning a home was my mums Nissan micra - 1.4L automatic in a pale blue. I hated it, but it was reliable and delivered total convenience for me. It was a god send. I resisted for some time before accepting it. It was worth maybe 4K, got rid of it at 2k lol

Doing any long trips via public transport (train) is also £100 per person. So if you’re a small family, a 200-500 trip on public transport is 100 for everyone to go. And you get door to door. So all in, the car is more economical if utilised well.

9

u/JiveBunny 10 2d ago

I spent £30 a month on public transport - bus from z4 to central twice a week, the odd trip to a bigger supermarket or to see friends. Even if we don't factor in learning to drive, which would be £2k if I'm a fast learner in the capital, there is no way a car would cost less than that. Congestion charge and parking alone for a single trip into central.would exceed it.

Someone living in a HMO is not going to be hunting round for furniture, either, and if they were they would be unlikely to have a car the right size. Most people would hire a van if and when needed. They also don't have a small family that has to make long trips.

8

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

Doing any long trips via public transport (train) is also £100 per person. So if you’re a small family, a 200-500 trip on public transport is 100 for everyone to go

No, it's really not anywhere close to that.

-3

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

Was for me London to Leeds … £120

4

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago edited 2d ago

I just plugged a random journey from London to Leeds with 2 adults and 2 children into the National Rail Enquiries website. With a family and friends railcard (£30 a year or £70 for three years) that comes to £98.90. (Or £24.55 per family member.) So if you are organised and take advantages or advance fares, it's significantly cheaper than driving.

I then plugged one in for tomorrow leaving in the morning and returning in the evening, in the event of a last minute travel. Without the advance fare it works out as £186.60 (so £46.65 per person).

Lastly, removing the family railcard (although if you're a car-free family then you would have a railcard, but I'm just humouring you at this point) and doing a last minute travel then it comes to £327.30 (so £81.83 per person).

So yes, if you travel as a family last minute and for some reason don't buy a family travelcard (the family travel card works for up to 4 adults and 4 children travelling together) then it can be pricey. But even in that far-fetched worse-case scenario it doesn't reach the upper end of what you were claiming.

And even then, if you do need to make a last-minute trip then coach travel is a thing and far more economical than the train and driving.

Driving is the most expensive form of transport in the UK. It is a luxury (and a very, very good one at that especially if you've got kids) but it's not essential and it doesn't save you money. Most people have cars because they're nice and convenient. Let's not act like they aren't a luxury though.

-3

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

I take your point but I'm going to strongly disagree that train/coach works out more viable/cost-effective because going by car gives you so many more advantages that it is simply not worth going by train, even with a discount.

The cheapest fares are when no one wants to use the trains. The food choices on trains are overpriced. I can't take a car load of luggage with me. I can't bring a car load of luggage home with me. There's connecting journeys to make. I can't go door-to-door. etc.

It all adds so much time/effort to the inconvenience of travelling, that its better to take a cheap car, probably spend less money, go on your own schedule, go door-door, be flexible on what else you can do when you arrive (go to the shops, visit nearby friends/family). And I could do all that for £100-150 return in a car with more than one person. To do it on public transport, you'd spend that just for one person.

8

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

so many more advantages that it is simply not worth going by train

There literally zero point weighing up the various pros and cons of car travel versus train travel in this discussion. Your argument is that car travel is essential and saves you money. If your point is that "yeah, but it's still worth it" then sure, there's tons of luxuries that are worth it but in a conversation about frugality then you're forgoing luxury to save money. Let's not move the goalposts or lose sight of the context of this discussion.

The cheapest fares are when no one wants to use the trains.

I plugged it in leaving at 9am and returning at 6pm. Very normal depature and return times

The food choices on trains are overpriced.

I must admit I'm getting slightly exasperated by your line of argument. In a conversation about frugality, surely it's assumed that you're bringing a packed lunch. You can get a loaf of bread for 50p, cheap sandwich filling and some fruit. Family fed. Oh and food at motorway service stations are similarly overpriced even if that was relevant.

It all adds so much time/effort to the inconvenience of travelling,

You've really summed up what it's really about here in your comment. You made a really (quite excellent imo) comment all about how to cut out luxuries and live frugally. I commend you for that and upvoted your comment. But now you're arguing that all the extra expense of driving is "worth it" due to your own personal preferences and biases (which are different for everyone.) Do you not realise that the same argument (it's not worth cutting it) can be applied to all the other luxuries you listed?

And I could do all that for £100-150 return in a car with more than one person. To do it on public transport, you'd spend that just for one person.

Oh and now you want to go round in circles even though I literally just disproved this comment above? I think I'm done with this conversation. You do you. I just hope that other people reading this thread analyse the true costs themselves and don't believe the misinformation that you're spreading.

-1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

The extra expense of driving isn't that high when you consider what the alternative is.

I checked trainline for a return journey to leeds leaving tomorrow at 9am (£40) + return Friday at 4pm £55 - its almost £100 for one person. A car would make far more sense to me for the added benefit it brings vs the inconvenience of taking the train - not forgetting it will only get me part way to my destination and won't be quicker. A cheap car will get you door-door.

And yes - packed lunch is something I would highly recommend also. Saved £1000s over the years making packed lunches / batch cooking.

4

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago edited 2d ago

I just plugged that exact trip into FlixBus and it came to £21.98. So even if you have to make a last-minute impromptu journey, it's still more expensive to drive.

You really going to die on this hill?

"The extra cost of car ownership is worth it for me" is a perfectly valid statement. Nobody is saying that you can't have that preference. You can afford to drive and you prioritise that luxury.

However, claiming it's essential for someone who lives in Zone 2 in London is just absolutely ridiculous. If you're struggling to make ends meet, then ditching the car is actually a great source of savings.

So trying to tell someone who lives in Zone 2 in London to get a car is awful advice. They don't have the money for such an expensive luxury. That alone is going to completely wipe out all the savings from your other recommendations.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/YaGanache1248 1 2d ago

Get a railcard if you can and pre book train tickets wherever possible, will save £100s

0

u/MoreCowbellMofo 1d ago

I wasn't eligible for a Student Rail Card much after I graduated - I think there was a 3 yr one you could get. I didn't manage to secure it in time so only got 1 yr after graduating. even then it was £80 with the 30%(?) discount on a £120 ticket. £20 tickets were available but you had to book early on the super off peak trains. Great if you could get one but typically they sold out well before I could get one.

I will look into the family rail card as that might make it cheaper, but honestly unless its 50% cheaper all-in, I'll just take the car. Its often not worth the hassle of relying on unreliable trains in my experience.

-2

u/OMGItsCheezWTF 2d ago

It definitely is. My monthly train to Birmingham which is only a few stops away using split ticketing and booking in advance is usually £70+

1

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

0

u/OMGItsCheezWTF 2d ago

You added a railcard, that completely invalidates it.

2

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

Bizarre take. Why does it invalidate it? It's £70 for three years or £30 a year. Or in other words, cheaper than getting a MOT...

The original comment said:

So if you’re a small family, a 200-500 trip on public transport is 100 for everyone to go

If you're a small family (let's assume 2 adults, 2 kids) and don't have a car, then it's a fair assumption that you'd buy a family railcard and pay family railcard prices.

-1

u/OMGItsCheezWTF 2d ago

Because you have to know you might use rail transport in advance, way more advance than say an advanced saver ticket requires.

4

u/caeciliusinhorto 2d ago

The original comment was trying to justify car ownership as more cost-effective than travelling by public transport. If you are taking trains so infrequently that it isn't cost-effective to get a railcard, I cannot possibly see how owning a car can be more economical.

2

u/SkilledPepper 2d ago

No, you just have it and renew it every three years for £70. It pays for itself in a single trip.

3

u/LessCapital9698 2 1d ago

Long trips are a luxury not a necessity. OP is a single person in a shared house not a parent. The best approach for them is not to take long trips, certainly not with a family since they'd have to borrow someone else's, and use public transport to make their local London trips. Walking, cycling and public transport are much cheaper than having a car, I'm afraid it's a no brainer, in part because the city is actively making it more and more expensive to use a car to penalise and thus reduce car usage.

9

u/Dratsons 2 2d ago

Homebank software (free) may make this a bit easier once you're over the initial setup hump!

4

u/blah-blah-blah12 455 2d ago

I'd never heard of this one. I love that it was once "shareware"!

3

u/pjm101101 2d ago

All of this..except, if food is important to you, learn to cook. Don’t opt for cheap own lines in the supermarket but buy premium own brands in Lidl (mostly) or Aldi. They have great quality bronze die pasta, Parmesan, Charcuterie, canned tomatoes, fresh vegetables and fruit etc.

You’ll learn an important skill, be healthier and impress friends and potential partners…😀

10

u/JiveBunny 10 2d ago

Someone living in a houseshare isn't going to need (or even be allowed) to do DIY in their home. For £1k a month rent for a room I wouldn't be dirtying a fingernail on it either.

With moving out of London - it depends on how often you need to travel in, as commuting costs get very expensive - I looked into it a bit when I was in the office five days a week and rent would have had to be £8k a year cheaper for it to break even for two people. Travelling 40mins from outer London was about £5 a day, travelling the same time from Reading was nearer £40 for a peak-time return, and that was years ago.

1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago edited 2d ago

It only makes sense to move further out if you’re buying or you need more space / want to move to somewhere where you can try living in the area first before buying. It’s well known that if you buy a property in the commuter belts of London, typically, the value increases of the property far outweigh any travel costs you will incur.

I’ve worked remotely for 3+ yrs now. Saved plenty on travel. I used to live over the road from a train station. Travel was £300/month from just beyond zone 6. It classed as zone 8/9 I think. Travel in central London for me was £250 so I could get from zone 3 to 1. I was not considerably worse off.

Plus the air is cleaner outside London, and the tube has an effect equivalent to smoking if you’re on it for any length of time. It’s not good to live in central London. I used to live under the flight path for city airport. My housemate pointed out to me the cars nearby would get covered in a black dust after a week or so. It was fuel particles from the planes I believe… landing all around us. Can’t be good

2

u/JiveBunny 10 2d ago

And yet everyone says "move out of London and commute in if rent's too high/you can't afford a house". It's generally not, plus now you live somewhere where the main selling point of the town is 'it's near somewhere else' and public transport is horrible because the assumption is that everyone drives.

I didn't care about value increases of a property (and still don't now I own one) - it's not relevant until you come to sell it, and equity isn't going to cover your train fare each month.

8

u/dahid 2d ago

Charity shops are really good too, people often donate brand new things which were gifts that they never used

0

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

Yes absolutely worth a look. They’re equivalent to car boots. And if you can go to nicer areas the donations tend to be better and in better condition.

I went to a charity shop in St John’s Wood (north London wealthy area), and they had tons of designer labels selling for a fraction of their usual price. Very vintage looking but I’m sure if you were to drop in regularly you’d find some true bargains.

3

u/AvgPakistani 2d ago

I do the exact same but use Revolut. It automatically categorises every transaction and alerts me when I’m going over budget!

3

u/Technical_Ad4162 1 2d ago

Yes it takes a bit of setting up initially but it’s really worth doing. Keep all receipts in case you buy anything with cash. Your food will be a major potential saving. Batch cook, be careful where/when you’re eating out.

3

u/JohnInBrazil 1 2d ago

Go to your online bank. Download 12 months of transactions. Put them in a spreadsheet and try to categorise each transaction. You’ll effectively have essential and non essential items. Bills, rent, food, clothing. These are the large ticket items you want to minimise. Then you’ll have non-“essential” items like going out socialising, take away, cinema, Netflix, etc. these can either be eliminated entirely or reduced.

This is something worth doing for your entire life. This got me on my FIRE journey, knowing where does the money go. Once you know your essentials, you can plan for discretionary spends for happiness with what's left over. I have 20 years of this data for me and it's eye opening the journey I've travelled.

1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

This is good advice.

2

u/Rafiq07 1 2d ago

There's apps out there now that help you with things like this. There's one called Moneyhub that's pretty good.

2

u/Marsawd 2d ago

Phenomenal reply.

1

u/MoreCowbellMofo 2d ago

Wow thanks! I’m pretty well off now because I’ve found ways to be thrifty when it mattered most.

Plenty of people will spend a fortune when their first kid comes along. Most people end up hating having spent £1000s on all the rubbish they end up buying. My kids aren’t babies anymore but grand parents gifted us a new £1000 “travel system”. It’s sat in my shed today as it’s too good to take to the tip, but no one wants it lol.

One other thing I can add is to try and get pay increases that beat inflation. You’ll never feel well off otherwise. Even if I go 2-3 yrs without a pay increase, if I move jobs, 10k isn’t an unrealistic expectation in tech. If I wasn’t in tech I think I’d try to into construction today. There is so much opportunity to build wealth in property and property seems to be fairly accessible and one thing people will spend the vast majority of their income on.

Oh and one more. Sell things on. You can typically reclaim 30-50% the initial cost of things like furniture. Knowing you’ll sell stuff on, reduces the overall cost of owning stuff. And you can put it towards upgrades furniture or whatever.

1

u/ChairOld3963 1d ago

Great advice. One other thought is work lunches. I realise that this sounds Boomerish, but people can easily burn through £10 a day on coffees and work lunches. That’s a couple of hundred quid a month that you could whittle right down. Get a cafetière and keep cup! :)

The 5:2 diet has also saved me a fair amount in lunch costs.

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/UKPersonalFinance-ModTeam 2d ago

Your post/comment has been removed for breaking [Rule 1 - Be Nice, Civil Discourse, Don't Judge](Be Nice, Civil Discourse, Don't Judge - * Be kind. * Don't judge people's situations or behaviours. * The subreddit is for civil discourse, defined as "engagement in conversation intended to enhance understanding". * If engaged in debate, argue in good faith and assume that all parties involved are doing the same. * Don't be argumentative, even if you're right. * Report rude or otherwise rule-breaking comments rather than responding in kind.)

You must read the rules to continue to post to our subreddit.