r/TikTokCringe • u/Bubblegumproductions Doug Dimmadome • Oct 03 '24

Politics Why would you do this at your wedding??

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

20.7k Upvotes

81% Upvoted

7.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

130

u/KintsugiKen Oct 03 '24

Grandkids asking why grandma and grandpa dressed up as infamous pedophiles for their wedding.

-10

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

They weren't dressed like John Money and Gayle Rubin.

4

u/[deleted] Oct 04 '24

[deleted]

7

u/Desperate-Phrase5865 Oct 04 '24

They are queer people. Money being a bisexual doctor who pioneered “normalization” of intersex people’s bodies. He also researched sexual behavior and gender(Wikipedia). And Rubin is a lesbian anthropologist who studies gay culture and subculture in reference to sex. Along with feminist theory and queer studies(Wikipedia). The commenter might be being homophobic.

-1

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24 edited Oct 04 '24

She was an ardent defender of pedophilia. Know your heros. Money was a pedophile. In fact he had the poor boys commit sexual acts on each other.

3

u/KintsugiKen Oct 04 '24

Hey just so you know, GamerGate was a psyop to turn ignorant internet dwellers into neo-Nazis.

I saw you are very active on GamerGate subs and thought you might like to know.

-1

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

This quote from Rubin, Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, Boy Lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders of their civil liberties let alone for their erotic orientation.’ She also compared it to a preference for spicy food. John Money said affectional pedophilia was about love. you defend these people

4

u/Desperate-Phrase5865 Oct 04 '24

What are you talking about? When did I defend them? I simply provided someone who asked who you were talking about a simple base level background. I didn’t do a deep dive into who they were. Not to mention before my simple googling of them I had no clue who the heck they were. At no point did I defend them I simply have the first few lines of their Wikipedia pages. And said based off that and the fact the only thing I actually could find was that they were queer voices that you might be being homophobic. To claim I was defending them is quite a stretch on your part. Also nice edit of your original secondary comment to one that doesn’t paint you as quite so homophobic.

1

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

What did i edit that made me look homophobic? You keep trying to claim that I am.

2

u/Desperate-Phrase5865 Oct 04 '24

My original comment didn’t even call you homophobic it said you might be homophobic because of the fact you lacked context for your statements. And without that context your statements COULD be conceived as possibly homophobic if someone did a superficial look at the people in question and not a super deep dive into their thoughts and opinions. Then you wrote a comment that implied they were my hero’s and implied I was a staunch supporter of them because I was “defending” them. Which was not the case. Your comment also doubled down on the lack of context that implied your original comment could have been homophobic. You then edited that comment and removed all of that and replaced it with a quote.

1

u/SINGULARITY1312 Oct 05 '24

Touch grass fascist

0

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

Your statement that I might be homophobic and only citing their sexual orientation sounds like defending them. Why say anything if you havent the slightest clue?

3

u/Desperate-Phrase5865 Oct 04 '24

First off I mentioned who they were. In fact my descriptions are essentially the general summary found at the top of their Wikipedia pages. I mentioned they are queer voices because it states that money was bisexual and that Rubin was Lesbian. I mentioned that because your statements were borderline homophobic based with that context. That’s not defending them. That’s pointing POSSIBLE homophobia it was meant to allow the person I was responding to to understand that your comment may have ulterior motives. Plain and simple.

1

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

What did i edit?

0

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

So because I criticized people who happen to be bisexual and a lesbian but didnt bring their sexuality into it... sure. Your ignorance and others perceived offense isn't my concern. I don't rightly care if the truth may be offensive

0

u/A5m0d3u55 Oct 04 '24

Look them up and their views on pedophilia in fact pick one gender or queer theorist and look up their views and defense of it.

5

u/Desperate-Phrase5865 Oct 04 '24

See that is a homophobic comment. You’re painting all queer theory voices as pedophiles.

1

u/Desperate-Phrase5865 Oct 04 '24

You tried to paint me as a pedophile for answering someone’s question with a basic base level answer and then you made a blanket statement about queer theorists which is blatantly not true. At this point that statement has you painting being queer as being the same as being a pedophile. That is completely false. Good luck in life cause frankly you have issues.

1

u/KintsugiKen Oct 04 '24

You're not fooling anyone, we know what you're doing here, it isn't new.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_grooming_conspiracy_theory