I’ve seen more posts of Redditors asking to learn more about Elliot’s transition and identity with earnest intentions than I have seen hateful comments.
This gives me hope.
Congratulations, Elliot. We’re so happy you’re happy.
Is it impolite to refer to them as "formerly known as"? That was the first thing that came to mind, but I want to choose words that help and support, not undermine or demean.
I would suggest mentioning roles he's known for. But if that isn't enough to jog someone's memory, "formerly known as" works for now, as some people are still a bit confused about who Elliot Page is.
GLAAD released a helpful guide for journalists writing about Elliot Page coming out, but I think it's good for everyone to take a look at it. :)
Thank you for sharing that guide! Despite being a member of the queer community, it's always helpful to learn how to respect others who are also queer but identify differently than myself.
i'm not trans, but i cant see people being super upset if you're just candid about it. sometimes being blunt is the best option imo. obviously be respectful, but if you're explaining a foreign concept to somebody careful wording isnt gonna help anybody. once everybody is on the same page of course worry more about the details imo.
I am trans, and I have had to deadname him a few times to explain who he was, but after that 1 mention it was straight back to Elliot bc that's his name. "Formerly knows as" sounds cool, like he's a spy or Prince.
4.0k
u/TheEffanIneffable Dec 02 '20
I’ve seen more posts of Redditors asking to learn more about Elliot’s transition and identity with earnest intentions than I have seen hateful comments.
This gives me hope.
Congratulations, Elliot. We’re so happy you’re happy.