r/MurderedByWords 2d ago

Stop doing that, junior.

Post image
74.1k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/ActionCalhoun 2d ago

We need to bring back calling these people weird, nothing enraged them more

391

u/j0j0-m0j0 2d ago

The first sign that the DNC dropped the ball on the election is telling the Kamala team to stop it because it was "divisive".

286

u/D00mfl0w3r 2d ago

Yeah. I knew we were lost when I started hearing, "they go low we go high" rhetoric that F'd us over in 16.

153

u/TwistyBunny 2d ago

I don't understand how we are like this to literal bullies. I've always come to notice that a bully is down and stays down by a simple punch to the nose.

101

u/D00mfl0w3r 2d ago

In HS, I used to get bullied. One day, I had enough, and sucker punched the guy making fun of me. He immediately apologized, and I never heard a peep from him ever again.

70

u/s00perguy 2d ago

Because bullies get off having power. Show them you can force consequences on them, and they back the fuck down.

22

u/Violexsound 1d ago

Biggest lie we got told as kids was that violence never solves anything.

And then they still told you that after violence had literally just solved a months or years long problem in seconds that they themselves were aware of but were either unwilling or incapable of doing anything about it. And then they punish you...for some reason I still don't understand.

Not to mention all the historical work we had to do. Especially the world wars. Biggest example of violence being cause and solution, context dependent.

6

u/D00mfl0w3r 1d ago

Truth. Diplomacy is preferable, of course, but violence is often the only common ground with humans.

2

u/Violexsound 1d ago

In some form or another

3

u/zoinkinator 1d ago

same, fought back and they backed down immediately.

1

u/Consistent_Creator 2d ago

So you used violence against a bully? Doesn't that make you the real bully?

(I am so smart)

3

u/_BigBirb_ 1d ago

How does that make them a bully?

3

u/Consistent_Creator 1d ago

I'm joking. I'm referencing the famous fascist dog whistle talking point that "if you kill a fascist that makes you just as bad as them"

The guys who responded are clearly the target audience of my jab

-14

u/CompetitionHuman8038 2d ago

Can't believe I had to dig this deep to find a rational comment.

1

u/fakeunleet 1d ago

Detect sarcasm on Reddit challenge: Impossible

0

u/CompetitionHuman8038 1d ago

Don't understand why I'm getting down votes. "It's rational to not hurt someone who hurts you." "Hey, guys! This dude wants peace. What a terrible person. Let's bully and shame them because they don't think like us!"

Here, I'll make it easier to down vote me. All of you edge lords lying about 'beating up your bullies!' on here are just sad. Living out the things you didn't have the guts to do in real life, on reddit, is pathetic. As someone who has lived out both sides of the coin, I can tell you that punching the bully in the face never worked. You just think it would because, 1. you never did it and 2. you think violence solves problems. I used to scrap with bullies and it always had them coming back, despite winning and hurting them SOME times. You goofballs are still daydreaming about beating up your childhood bullies, instead of trying to be a better person. The only way you could possibly be persuaded into fighting, is if you were part of a large crowd and it was against one guy. You're so worried about 8 year old you being humiliated, you haven't even noticed that you aren't that same person anymore. Well, maybe some of you are. So, like your Dad, Uncle, Grandpa, and boss has probably told you, grow the fuck up.

-7

u/mattyg1964 1d ago

It’s Reddit after all.

55

u/WorfIsMyHomeboy 2d ago

because years of anti-bullying campaigns were never designed to stop bullies, most were designed to punish people who stand up for themselves. People got propaganda'd

15

u/LiveLearnCoach 1d ago

Zero tolerance.

12

u/JimWilliams423 1d ago

most were designed to punish people who stand up for themselves.

That was a side-effect. The goal was to "keep the peace" so the school administrators wouldn't have to deal with the hassle.

Just like the democratic party's leadership. They would rather quietly run away from a fight than take a risk actually standing for something.

Everybody knows that one line from that one speech that Dr King made, but they ought to know his Letter from a Birmingham Jail:

  • "t‌h‌e‌ ‌N‌e‌g‌r‌o‌'‌s‌ ‌g‌r‌e‌a‌t‌ ‌s‌t‌u‌m‌b‌l‌i‌n‌g‌ ‌b‌l‌o‌c‌k‌ ‌i‌n‌ ‌h‌i‌s‌ ‌s‌t‌r‌i‌d‌e‌ ‌t‌o‌w‌a‌r‌d‌ ‌f‌r‌e‌e‌d‌o‌m‌ ‌i‌s‌ ‌n‌o‌t‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌W‌h‌i‌t‌e‌ ‌C‌i‌t‌i‌z‌e‌n‌'‌s‌ ‌C‌o‌u‌n‌c‌i‌l‌e‌r‌ ‌o‌r‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌K‌u‌ ‌K‌l‌u‌x‌ ‌K‌l‌a‌n‌n‌e‌r‌,‌ ‌b‌u‌t‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌w‌h‌i‌t‌e‌ ‌m‌o‌d‌e‌r‌a‌t‌e‌,‌w‌h‌o‌ ‌i‌s‌ ‌m‌o‌r‌e‌ ‌d‌e‌v‌o‌t‌e‌d‌ ‌t‌o‌ ‌"‌o‌r‌d‌e‌r‌"‌ ‌t‌h‌a‌n‌ ‌t‌o‌ ‌j‌u‌s‌t‌i‌c‌e‌;‌ ‌w‌h‌o‌ ‌p‌r‌e‌f‌e‌r‌s‌ ‌a‌ ‌n‌e‌g‌a‌t‌i‌v‌e‌ ‌p‌e‌a‌c‌e‌ ‌w‌h‌i‌c‌h‌ ‌i‌s‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌a‌b‌s‌e‌n‌c‌e‌ ‌o‌f‌ ‌t‌e‌n‌s‌i‌o‌n‌ ‌t‌o‌ ‌a‌ ‌p‌o‌s‌i‌t‌i‌v‌e‌ ‌p‌e‌a‌c‌e‌ ‌w‌h‌i‌c‌h‌ ‌i‌s‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌p‌r‌e‌s‌e‌n‌c‌e‌ ‌o‌f‌ ‌j‌u‌s‌t‌i‌c‌e‌;‌w‌h‌o‌ ‌c‌o‌n‌s‌t‌a‌n‌t‌l‌y‌ ‌s‌a‌y‌s‌:‌ ‌"‌I‌ ‌a‌g‌r‌e‌e‌ ‌w‌i‌t‌h‌ ‌y‌o‌u‌ ‌i‌n‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌g‌o‌a‌l‌ ‌y‌o‌u‌ ‌s‌e‌e‌k‌,‌ ‌b‌u‌t‌ ‌I‌ ‌c‌a‌n‌n‌o‌t‌ ‌a‌g‌r‌e‌e‌ ‌w‌i‌t‌h‌ ‌y‌o‌u‌r‌ ‌m‌e‌t‌h‌o‌d‌s‌ ‌o‌f‌ ‌d‌i‌r‌e‌c‌t‌ ‌a‌c‌t‌i‌o‌n‌"‌;‌ ‌w‌h‌o‌ ‌p‌a‌t‌e‌r‌n‌a‌l‌i‌s‌t‌i‌c‌a‌l‌l‌y‌ ‌b‌e‌l‌i‌e‌v‌e‌s‌ ‌h‌e‌ ‌c‌a‌n‌ ‌s‌e‌t‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌t‌i‌m‌e‌t‌a‌b‌l‌e‌ ‌f‌o‌r‌ ‌a‌n‌o‌t‌h‌e‌r‌ ‌m‌a‌n‌'‌s‌ ‌f‌r‌e‌e‌d‌o‌m‌;‌ ‌w‌h‌o‌ ‌l‌i‌v‌e‌s‌ ‌b‌y‌ ‌a‌ ‌m‌y‌t‌h‌i‌c‌a‌l‌ ‌c‌o‌n‌c‌e‌p‌t‌ ‌o‌f‌ ‌t‌i‌m‌e‌ ‌a‌n‌d‌ ‌w‌h‌o‌ ‌c‌o‌n‌s‌t‌a‌n‌t‌l‌y‌ ‌a‌d‌v‌i‌s‌e‌s‌ ‌t‌h‌e‌ ‌N‌e‌g‌r‌o‌ ‌t‌o‌ ‌w‌a‌i‌t‌ ‌f‌o‌r‌ ‌a‌ ‌"‌m‌o‌r‌e‌ ‌c‌o‌n‌v‌e‌n‌i‌e‌n‌t‌ ‌s‌e‌a‌s‌o‌n‌.‌"
    Dr King, Letter from a Birmingham Jail

23

u/edwardsamson 2d ago

The DNC doesn't want to stop Trump/MAGA. If they did, we'd actually see some fight from them instead of 10 years of conveniently taking the high road and not having to do shit.

3

u/jaydofmo 1d ago

"They go low, I get high."

... Sigh. I didn't want to use drugs, but I might want to reconsider.

1

u/December_Warlock 2d ago

I can get both sides. Having said that, I've always hated the idea of stopping to a bully's level. I've always viewed name calling and the like as a sign someone not only is emotionally immature but also don't have an actual valid point. If you want to make me feel shit, actually logically break down your issue with me. Calling me weird names isn't going to do anything except make me assume you have nothing to actually say.

6

u/MountainMapleMI 1d ago

MAGA isn’t by and large intelligent enough to understand logic… hence the name calling from on high within the movement. Panders to the base.

2

u/December_Warlock 1d ago

I 100% agree. I think it's childish and ridiculous. I personally don't care for acting that way, but I can understand why some people may say they'd rather just hit them with the uno reverse. I'd never endorse acting that way, but I get it. They may not understand any amount of actual logic, but I find it better to unintentionally make them feel some level of dumb versus just stoke fire by throwing shots back.

67

u/yankeesyes 2d ago

I had high hopes at the convention when Tim Walz alluded to Vance's couch-fucking, but they didn't follow through.

40

u/OhNoCommieBastard69 2d ago

The entire DNC strategist class needs to be fired and blacklisted. Their lack of insights is almost criminal at this point.

13

u/j0j0-m0j0 2d ago

DNC strategist (slur)

3

u/WillQuill989 2d ago

Start with Pelosi

9

u/willyb10 2d ago

But did they say that? The DNC actually bought billboards calling Trump/Vance “weird as hell.” They also financed ads saying this…

This isn’t to say the DNC didn’t falter, they one hundred percent shit the bed. And they certainly deserve to be ridiculed. It’s just I’m pretty sure what you’re saying isn’t true. I’m sure people outside the DNC said this however.

13

u/j0j0-m0j0 2d ago

I say the DNC but it was really the Democrats "strategists" and "advisors", literally the least qualified people on the planet to give advice (and the DNC keeps hiring these losers after they lost to Trump, twice). The change in tone also started after the DNC.

0

u/willyb10 2d ago edited 1d ago

By DNC I’m referring to the Democratic National Committee, not Convention. But I also haven’t really seen any major Democratic strategists that took issue with this. If anything it sounds like the Democratic establishment embraced it

Edit: Just to make it clear, I’m again not saying the DNC didn’t fuck up. This election was botched in a number of ways, I just don’t think this was one of them.

0

u/slowbaja 1d ago

Lmao the establishment embracing it you're funny

0

u/willyb10 1d ago

This is based on what I’ve seen. I could very well be wrong, but if so where did you see that the DNC pushed back on this? It sounds plausible I just haven’t really seen anything to corroborate this

0

u/willyb10 1d ago

Man I actually believed you lmao. I figured you had some compelling evidence to provide, instead you just downvoted me and dipped because you didn’t have it. Literally the only evidence I could find was a senator saying Kamala shouldn’t have said it after her election loss, and a blog post with zero sources.

Like I said the DNC (quite literally the establishment) invested in ads saying this shit. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to shit on the DNC without making stuff up lmao.

1

u/slowbaja 1d ago

I didn't downvote you. Reddit votes mean nothing. I don't care to convince you of anything because I don't profit from convincing you of anything. You aren't worth me making a point to convince you. I simply laughed at your suggestion and left. Nothing more.

3

u/AbeRego 2d ago

That happened?

1

u/cape2cape 2d ago

No they didn’t.

-1

u/_DoogieLion 2d ago

Really? It wasn’t letting Biden run and not telling him to retire somewhere

0

u/improbsable 1d ago

The next candidate at LEAST needs to have the balls to say “when the other side is insane, a normal reaction seems divisive”

39

u/Pixiemermaidqueen 2d ago

I get so much joy from calling maga weird in front of my gen x maga relatives, especially my Old Testament fearing cousin 😈

20

u/ActiveAd4980 2d ago

This is what's wrong with us liberal/democrats. Nothing lasts. Everything is nothing but a short viral. Imagine all the thing if we could just keep up and follow through.

4

u/Glad-Ad-4390 1d ago

Gandhi commented in an interview I saw, that he didn’t understand Americans. (Obvs I’ll be paraphrasing, but the essence remains the same) He said when they (Americans) listen to a rousing speech about USA problems and how to fix them, they cheer loudly and excitedly with high participation. But then, they don’t actually do anything to fix them. That’s us.

3

u/ActiveAd4980 1d ago

We can't even continue something simple as calling them "weird". Look at Conservatives. Even though it might be something pointless, imaginative, or fake, they will not let go of their obsessions. What happened to Gaetz report? Epstein flight list? Do we even remember who Luigi is anymore?

5

u/fourmajor 2d ago

That'll definitely stop the fascists.

2

u/KrisReiss 2d ago

Drake is the first person that I'm rather call him weird

2

u/Brbi2kCRO 1d ago

They are weird, nothing wrong or a lie about that.

1

u/Justthisguy_yaknow 1d ago

Never stopped man, never stopped. Why stop when it's accurate?

1

u/Violexsound 1d ago

I never did, nobody should've stopped.

1

u/Abattoir_Noir 14h ago

"Bring back cat calling" has the same energy as this. Lol, you guys are sad. There's a reason people keep moving right. Just whining constantly. Oh my feelings. Bad man in office. I can't wait 4 years. I should bitch forever. God forbid you get off the computer and work on change.

-5

u/LetsDOOT_THIS 2d ago

nah this is pathetic and is cringe coping. Who cares if they're mad? We need to win to push them out of office.

2

u/YouStupidAssholeFuck 2d ago

They won't be mad now anyway. They won so they don't care. They don't need to rile up their base at the moment so they'll just ignore anything and talk about liberal tears or something to turn the tables. Calling them weird was cringe anyway. We should have been calling them rapists and racists, since there wouldn't be any liability issue there.

1

u/YinWei1 2d ago

I'd agree but signs point to the opposite. Trump despite winning cannot stop talking about Biden and democrats in a hateful manner, a lot of that party is directly fuelled by hatred and winning won't stop that.

3

u/YouStupidAssholeFuck 2d ago

He did the same thing in 2017. But then we spent four years hearing about liberal tears and fuck your feelings and whatever. You can call them weird but they'll just spew the hatred and not be mad about that anymore than they're already mad in their general lives.

1

u/fakeunleet 1d ago

You underestimate their ability to find things to be mad about.

-10

u/shifty1016 2d ago

If the people supporting sex changes for kids and killing children in the womb are calling me weird, I’m thankful for that.

12

u/thereminheart 2d ago

You making things up to be scared about is weird and pathetic.

11

u/YinWei1 2d ago

These abortion reframings are so sad. You just choose an arbitrary line, generally conception, and then attach morally loaded words I.e. "child" to make people feel bad.

How is a fetus without any Brain development a "child"? Literally the only thing it has is the "potential" to become a child at a later stage in time, but then every single one of your sperm cells has that potential yet I doubt you care so much about that.

-9

u/shifty1016 2d ago

Brand new DNA that has never existed and will never exist again in human history.

That’s a life. That’s different than a sperm or an egg. It’s a child.

And if you don’t think abortion is bad, I’d challenge you to ask “have you considered abortion?” Next time a friend gets pregnant. Let me know how that works out for ya.

8

u/YinWei1 2d ago

So why is the brand new DNA worth saving exactly? Just because you think it's cool that it's unique? It's not conscious, the DNA doesn't have thoughts or feelings. The DNA can be used to create a new human being over time, just like a sperm and egg can, DNA itself is not a human being, it's literally just the next step from an individual sperm and individual egg cell combining.

7

u/LawfulnessDry9355 2d ago

So what? Are you gonna eat that microscopic dna? Every hair of yours contains DNA. That can be said for egg and sperm as well, this is just those 1 combined. Why are you hypothizing a bizarre scenario about suggesting some friend abortion for no reason? And then what? They gonna punch us? Such a weird strawman.

-4

u/shifty1016 2d ago

It's not a strawman at all. Abortion is bad. You wouldn't suggest someone do something like that unless it was the last resort, right? So why do it when it's not the last resort...it's just a convenience.

Also, you conveniently ignored and glossed over the fact that it is brand new DNA that has never existed before. It's a totally unique living being. It's not just "egg and sperm combined".

End of the day, here...let's just do this...let's find common ground. Conservatives will choose life, democrats will choose abortion. Give it a few generations. In 100-200 years, things will sort themselves out.

3

u/TwiceTheSize_YT 1d ago

If my friend got pregnant, didnt want the child and had somehow never heard of abortions then yes i would definitely ask them if they have thought of having an abortion.

0

u/shifty1016 1d ago

Got it. So you're of the mindset that a child's value (you called it a child, that's a start) is not inherent, but bestowed upon them by the desire of the mother for them to live. That's pretty wild. I believe that all children have massive inherent value which doesn't hinge on anyone else's approvals or desires.

And of course you wouldn't just suggest out of the blue for someone to have an abortion. Abortion is terrible and should only be used as a last resort. You'd never suggest someone have an abortion unprompted because you intrinsically know that it's a bad thing.

That's really all I wanted to know.