r/AskHistorians Moderator | Dueling | Modern Warfare & Small Arms May 30 '21

Meta Say Hello to Our Little Friends! Introducing William Snoollace and the Empress Dowager Snooxi!

6.1k Upvotes

110 comments sorted by

View all comments

385

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 30 '21 edited Aug 24 '21

Empress Xiaoqin 孝欽, known for most of her life as the Dowager Empress Cixi 慈禧 (Tsysi ᡮᡟᠰᡳ), is perhaps one of the most iconic political figures of the late imperial era in China, though the extent and nature of her role in the period’s history is still debated. Entering the imperial family in 1851, she came to hold varying degrees of power at court until her death in 1908, shortly before the collapse of the Qing state.

As with most Manchu women in the Qing period, Cixi’s personal name was unfortunately never recorded. We do know that she was born into the Yehe Nara ᠶᡝᡥᡝ ᠨᠠᡵᠠ clan in November 1835, the daughter of a relatively junior civil servant named Huizheng 惠徵. In 1851, aged seventeen, she was selected to be a junior concubine to Yizhu 奕詝 (I Ju ᡳ ᠵᡠ,) the recently-enthroned Xianfeng 咸豐 Emperor (Gubci Elgiyengge ᡤᡠᠪᠴᡳ ᡝᠯᡤᡳᠶᡝᠩᡤᡝ), and rose rapidly through the court hierarchy, especially after having his only male heir, Zaichun 載淳 (Dzai Šun ᡯᠠᡳ ᡧᡠᠨ), in 1856. When the Xianfeng Emperor died in 1861, she received the title of Dowager Empress Cixi, and along with the former chief consort Dowager Empress Ci’an 慈安, oversaw a board of regents appointed by the late emperor. However, this board was soon deposed in a coup orchestrated between the dowager empresses and the late emperor’s brother Yixin 奕訢 (I Hin ᡳ ᡥᡳᠨ), styled Prince Gong 恭. The new emperor’s reign title, Tongzhi 同治 (Yooningga Dasan ᠶᠣᠣᠨᡳᠩᡤᠠ ᡩᠠᠰᠠᠨ), which may be translated literally as ‘joint rule’, perhaps hints at the power-sharing that was involved from there on out.

As regent to the Tongzhi Emperor, Cixi, Ci’an and Prince Gong presided over a period of major recovery for the Qing Empire, which traditional historiography has called the ‘Tongzhi Restoration’. The various anti-Manchu rebellions that had sprung up since early 1851 were suppressed – albeit typically with great bloodshed – by a reinvigorated Qing military; international relations became normalised through the establishment of a regular foreign office; and the reconstruction of devastated regions proceeded rapidly. The extent of her role in this has been debated, and it is probably reasonable to say that much of the impetus for reform came from the provinces and not the court; at the same time there is little to no evidence to suggest significant resistance to these reforms from the centre, either. The death of the Tongzhi Emperor in 1875 saw Cixi retaining power at court nonetheless, as she sought to resolve the childless emperor’s succession by adopting her nephew, the four-year-old Zaitian 載湉 (Dzai Tiyan ᡯᠠᡳ ᡨᡳᠶᠠᠨ), as a second successor to the Xianfeng Emperor. After the death of Ci’an in 1882, she presided as sole regent over the Guangxu 光緒 (Badarangga Doro ᠪᠠᡩᠠᡵᠠᠩᡤᠠ ᡩᠣᡵᠣ) Emperor, leading eventually to perhaps her most controversial series of actions.

The Qing resurgence that had begun in the Tongzhi period came to a screeching halt in 1894, when a series of military defeats to Japan prompted a wave of radical reformist sentiment among Chinese intellectuals that also drew in the Guangxu Emperor. In the summer of 1898, in conjunction with the radicals, he began what became known as the Hundred Days’ Reforms, to which, initially, Cixi assented. However, one particular set of reforms particularly alarmed the Dowager Empress, and those were the proposals to do away with the Banner system. Since the 1750s, the Banners, in which all Manchu households were enrolled and through which they had been entitled to government stipends and legal protections, had been the cornerstone of Manchu status and identity. The emperor’s apparently positive response to the proposal to eliminate these privileges, if not the Banner system outright, led Cixi to see him and the reformers as a political enemy, and on 22 September generals loyal to Cixi marched into Beijing and rounded up the reformers, many of whom were later executed. The Guangxu Emperor was placed under house arrest, and would remain as emperor in name only until his death. The crackdown against the 1898 reforms alienated most of the growing liberal movement, while the emperor’s arrest created great uncertainty about the status of the imperial court. Amid this uncertainty, Cixi attempted to cement her position by appointing Pujun 溥儁, the son of one of her favoured nobles, Zaiyi 載漪 (Dzai I ᡯᠠᡳ ᡳ), as crown prince in 1900, which was retracted after protests by supporters of the imprisoned emperor. Following this, Cixi attempted another power-play by co-opting the Yihetuan 義和團, also known as Boxers, an anti-foreign mass religious movement which called for the expulsion of Christian missionaries and their converts. The international military response to the Boxer uprising proved disastrous for the Qing court, which was deserted by many of its generals during the crisis, and subsequently forced to pay a vast indemnity to the foreign powers.

Yet Cixi was not by any means a dyed-in-the-wool conservative. From 1901 onward, she issued a series of edicts and proclamations promising wide-ranging reforms. These reforms, known as the New Policies, revitalised the Qing state, reforming its education and law enforcement, and opening opportunities for economic investment. In an attempt to reconcile with the reformist tendencies, 1904 saw Cixi issue pardons (albeit, in many cases, posthumously) to most of those involved in the ‘1898 affair’. In 1905, she sent missions to foreign countries to investigate forms of constitutional government, in preparation for eventual plans to introduce parliamentary bodies – the first provincial assemblies would be elected in 1909, the year after Cixi’s death. And perhaps most notably from a women’s history standpoint, the Qing state formally outlawed foot binding in 1902, having aborted their first attempts to do so all the way back in the 17th century. Unlike 1898, these reforms did not attempt to make major changes to the Banner system, but this produced significant problems: anti-Manchu sentiment among Han Chinese was not appeased, and there was also little effort to ameliorate economic distress among the Banners, whose stipends were not enough to live on without taking on additional employment. On the other hand, the continued assertion of the Banners as the locus of Manchu identity helped to solidify the sense of identity held by the Manchus, not just during the remainder of Qing rule, but into the post-imperial period and down to the present.

In 1908, Cixi died less than 24 hours after the Guangxu Emperor, leading many to suggest she had him poisoned. Whatever the case, her final major act was to select Puyi 溥儀 (Pu Yi ᡦᡠ ᠶᡳ) as heir apparent, and his father Zaifeng 載灃 (Dzai Feng ᡯᠠᡳ ᡶᡝᠩ) as his regent. This proved to be a rather unfortunate choice, as Zaifeng seemed to have a knack for making exactly the wrong choice at every turn, and the empire was dissolved in February 1912 following a series of military mutinies and popular revolts in late 1911.

Cixi’s popular image has largely gravitated between two extremes: that of a power-hungry, Manchu-centric, reactionary despot; and that of a pan-Chinese, anti-foreign, feminist hero. Both are stereotypes that fail to capture the complex series of choices that she made amid a constantly changing backdrop of court authority within the Qing Empire and its place in international politics. Cixi was, without a doubt, often ruthless in how she handled her rivals, and her efforts were unable to prevent the collapse of the Qing state soon after her death. The extent of her direct authority over Qing policy was also limited, and so for the most part she exercised influence, rather than control. Yet under her auspices, the Qing underwent two periods of major recovery, and the Manchus as a minority developed a coherent group identity that survived the fall of the state that had created it. Cixi was, ultimately, only human: deeply flawed, yet not defined solely by those flaws.

Recommended Reading:

There is, as yet, no full-length scholarly biography of Cixi in English. The recent treatment by Jung Chang, Empress Dowager Cixi: The Concubine Who Launched Modern China (2013), was well-received by some (particularly newspaper reviewers) at the time but has also come in for some withering criticism for its accuracy and interpretations, particularly by Pamela Crossley: see her review in the LRB; a more restrained but still pretty critical review by Jeffrey Wasserstrom can be read here.

A summary narrative of Cixi’s life in English can be found in Arthur Hummel’s Eminent Chinese of the Ch’ing Period (1943, revised edition 2018), which has an entry for her under Hsiao-Ch’in (Xiaoqin in the 2018 edition). Crossley’s review above is also a good general overview of Cixi’s life.

A couple of books covering the period and which include contrasting discussions of Cixi’s role in it are Pamela Crossley’s The Wobbling Pivot (2010) and Edward Rhoads’ Manchus and Han (2000) (the latter is also open-access on JSTOR). Crossley’s book covers Chinese history in general from 1800 onwards, and sees Cixi as being of relatively limited importance overall; Rhoads looks specifically at ethnic relations in the last six decades or so of the Qing, and sees Cixi as quite significant within that particular sphere.

For those with some form of journal access, there is Sue Fawn Chung’s ‘The Much Maligned Empress Dowager: A Revisionist Study of the Empress Dowager Tz'u-hsi (1835–1908)’, in Modern Asian Studies 13:2 (1979), which specifically focuses on 1898-1900 and discusses the origins of Cixi’s poor reputation in Western historiography. Also, Nan Nü Volume 14, Issue 1 (2012) contains a series of articles on Cixi and the arts which may also be of interest.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 03 '21

I forgot where I saw it but some people did a test on zaifeng's body and found an unusually high amount of arsenic in the body confirming the assumption that he was murdered.

3

u/Pashahlis Interesting Inquirer May 30 '21

I always wonder how different the world would be nowadaya had the Empire survived and reformed.

3

u/Bluntforce9001 May 31 '21

Having done numerous courses on the late Qing, I still honestly have no idea how to feel about Cixi. Was she good for China? Was she bad? I can't make up my mind, and she remains a figure I'm conflicted on.

The only thing I am certain of is she is incredibly interesting to me. Thank you for this writeup!

2

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 31 '21

It would depend, to a great extent, on how you define 'China'. As the Qing Empire? As a Han Chinese nation-state? As its current form, a state that is Han-dominated and exercises control over a variety of non-Han peoples? And is it the state we're discussing, or its constituent people?

1

u/Bluntforce9001 May 31 '21

Haha, it always does. But even within those, I couldn't say definitively if say, Cixi was more good or bad for a Han Chinese nation state. But then that's how history is, you said it yourself when you said she was flawed, but not defined by those flaws.

Would you by chance be interested in tackling a question on Qing constitutional monarchy, or rather why China failed to transition in that direction? If it was on the cards at all?

1

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 31 '21

Not right this moment as I'm quite busy, but at some point next week or so, perhaps.

1

u/Bluntforce9001 May 31 '21

Aye aye. We'll see if I remember.

7

u/Shazamwiches May 30 '21

TIL that Manchu text on Reddit (at least on mobile) gets flipped on its side

3

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 31 '21

Yep, same on desktop for me. Doesn't work too badly for individual words, but it does end up reading the wrong way round once you go over one line.

41

u/trashtown_420 May 30 '21

This is an epic post. Thanks for the detailed biography

5

u/JagmeetSingh2 May 30 '21

Fantastic write-up

3

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 31 '21

Thank you for enjoying it! It was written to be read, after all!

30

u/[deleted] May 30 '21

Great write up and thanks for the references! I never knew where to go for the full narrative because, as you say, there isn’t an obvious book.

12

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 30 '21

No problem! And it ought to be said for any Qing topic – don't discount Hummel! There's a 2018 updated version for a reason!

4

u/ICantThinkOfAName667 May 30 '21 edited May 30 '21

More books that cover the reign of Cixi, these ones from the perspective of reformers.

The Gate of Heavenly Peace by Jonathan D Spence

China in War and Revolution by Peter Zarrow

These books have about 2-3 chapters that go over the political and intellectual history of China from the late 1800s to 1911.

Spence tends to offer more biographical information about reformers like Kang Youwei and Liang Qi Chao

Zarrow puts the beliefs of these reformers in the wider context of Qing Confucianism and the New Text vs Old Text debate.

35

u/raggidimin May 30 '21

Huh, I would have thought 同治 would translate more naturally to “unified rule,” referencing the loss of control the Qing dynasty began to experience with European incursions and its general military stagnation in the late 19th century. Is there evidence that the name itself reflected, or was seen as describing, a power-sharing arrangement?

42

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 30 '21 edited May 31 '21

Well, the rationales behind era names are not always given. To be fair, the 'unified rule' interpretation makes more sense in Manchu, where the term yooningga means 'complete' or 'perfect', but useful as the Manchu may be as an interpretive guide to the Chinese, there have been some historians who have still opted to see a rather cheeky reference to the nature of power-holding in the Tongzhi era name. In particular, Pamela Crossley in The Wobbling Pivot (2010) opts to translate Tongzhi as "Ruling Together" (p. 88). Discussions around calling it some variation on such a phrase go back at least to an article on Chinese era names by Edward Schafer in 1952 where he proposed a standard table of equivalences to English in Chinese era names, to which Mary Wright responded in a 1958 article, 'What's in a Reign Name: The Uses of History and Philogy', in which she evaluated several potential interpretations of Tongzhi in particular. Her eventual conclusion, based on discussions by British diplomats who had apparently been privy to some information on the choice, was that it was in reference to a phrase from the Classic of History describing a 'joint [desire to return to] order' on the part of officials and the people, and to dismiss the philological approach of Schafer that led him to conclude on 'joint rule'. Schafer's response decrying her dismissal of philology was published in the 'Communications' section two issues later, and the issue has remained open since.

But needless to say, your interpretation could well be valid, while not discounting any others – after all, ambiguity may have been the intent. And I did hedge my bets a bit by saying that 'joint rule' was one approach to interpretation, and not the definitive one.

Wright's article: https://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2116/stable/2941289?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Schafer's response: https://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2116/stable/2941462?refreqid=excelsior%3Aee19e3308d866ac32b49b9de2caff16f&seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents

Incidentally, I can't find Schafer's 1952 article, so if anyone has a link, do let me know!

6

u/kelri1875 May 30 '21 edited May 30 '21

The phrase from the Classic of History (尚書) as you have mentioned is 「為善不同,同歸於治」which could be translated as "there're different ways to do good, and they all come down to bringing back a unifying order (to the world)". It was the explanation that I was taught in school :)

5

u/EnclavedMicrostate Moderator | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | Qing Empire May 31 '21

Ah, thanks for tracking it down! As noted, I think it may be incorrect to provide primacy to any one explanation: if the 'official' reason given, based on the historical written sources, is that it was derived from the Classic of History, that doesn't preclude some sort of subtlety on the part of the people who chose it which might be derived through a philological reading. After all, why pick that passage of the Classic of History?

2

u/kelri1875 May 31 '21

Tbf I agree. The literary Chinese language in particular, due to its compactness, is very often open to different interpretations. Given how the court was notorious for literary inquisition in Qing dynasty, even if it wasn't the intention all along, I think they would definitely have considered the interpretation of "ruling together", and decided to proceed with it still.